15 cars - 1 engine (2.0 litre with 200 hp)

[ree]

All these cars have the same engine - the 2.0 litre engine with 200 hp!

Which car would you choose?!

So here we go again, after this poll was a victim of the germancarforum crash.

I updated the poll with some data of the Top Speed and acceleration. You can see, that there are no big differences between the competitors!


Audi A3 / Sportback




Top Speed: 236 km/h

acceleration: 7,1 sec


Audi A4 / Avant / Convertible




Top Speed: 241 km/h

acceleration: 7,3 s


Audi TT Coupé / Roadster




Top Speed: 240 km/h

acceleration: 6,6 s


Volkswagen Golf GTI




Top Speed: 235 km/h

acceleration: 7,2 s


Volkswagen Jetta




Top Speed: 235 km/h

acceleration: 7,5 s


Volkswagen Passat / Variant




Top Speed: 235 km/h

acceleration: 7,6 s


Volkswagen EOS




Top Speed: 232 km/h

acceleration: 7,8 s


Seat Leon




Top Speed: 229 km/h

acceleration: 7,3 s


Seat Altea




Top Speed: 220 km/h

acceleration: 7,7 s


Skoda Octavia RS




Top Speed: 240 km/h

acceleration: 7,3 s

 

[ree]

GTI

 

[MikeJ]

I vote for the A3, again.

 

[Deleted member 25]

Why all the cars are from Vag ?
I choose another option: Honda Civic Type R.

 

[wltsm]

Why all the cars are from Vag ?
I choose another option: Honda Civic Type R.

The reason is they all share the same engine!

Easy choice, definitely the GTI!

 

[Deleted member 25]

The reason is they all share the same engine!

Easy choice, definitely the GTI!

Sometimes i feel really like an idiot.

 

[Cashmere]

Sometimes i feel really like an idiot.

If money wasnt an issue, it would be thr TT or the EOS.... but if I had to make a sensbile/practical choice, the GTi fo sho!

 

[Mr Robert]

Has to be the TT, beautiful car.

 

[Kowalski]

Why all the cars are from Vag ?
I choose another option: Honda Civic Type R.

Why Japanese are so obsessed with Bhp per Litre?

Seriously, it's all very nice to get 100 Bhp/L from a normally aspirated 2.0 16V I-4-cylinder engine. But what about the torque? What about fuel consumption? What about smoothness?

You can call me a square if you like, but I much rather have a smooth 2.0 16V Turbo with "only" 170 Bhp (like the one in the Vauxhall Vectra SRi) that is plenty of torque, than a high-revving 2.0 16V normally aspirated engine which needs to be worked hard on the gears to finally develop the power.

I drove the old Honda Civic Type-R and I pretty much hated it.

Handling was (very) good, but everything else was rubbish.

Driving position was very Ford Transit-like, ride was painfully harsh, uncomfortable seats, engine was loud and noisy, but for me the worst thing about it, it was the lack of torque on low revs. Not a good car to drive around town or cruise along the motorway.

I dare to say, the old Civic Type-R it is one of the worst cars I have ever driven.

 

[Bruce]

Audi 2.0 TT TFSI Coupé for myself. Again

 

[audi_rudy]

tt coupe for me, its just a cool little car.

 

[Deleted member 25]

Why Japanese are so obsessed with Bhp per Litre?

Seriously, it's all very nice to get 100 Bhp/L from a normally aspirated 2.0 16V I-4-cylinder engine. But what about the torque? What about fuel consumption? What about smoothness?

You can call me a square if you like, but I much rather have a smooth 2.0 16V Turbo with "only" 170 Bhp (like the one in the Vauxhall Vectra SRi) that is plenty of torque, than a high-revving 2.0 16V normally aspirated engine which needs to be worked hard on the gears to finally develop the power.

I drove the old Honda Civic Type-R and I pretty much hated it.

Handling was (very) good, but everything else was rubbish.

Driving position was very Ford Transit-like, ride was painfully harsh, uncomfortable seats, engine was loud and noisy, but for me the worst thing about it, it was the lack of torque on low revs. Not a good car to drive around town or cruise along the motorway.

I dare to say, the old Civic Type-R it is one of the worst cars I have ever driven.

Man pushing hard is why we enjoy Rpms and so Atmo engines.

 

[Giannis]

I am the A4 car type guy, so a black A4 would be great for me!

 

[Mr. M]

GTI. It suits this car best with DSG, 4 seats and a history to be proud of. A perfect combination.

 

[Merc1]

This engine is pimped heavily by the VW group I see. It has no place in the A4 Cabriolet though, read SLOW. My choice for this engine is the U.S. Jetta GLI.

I want one of these, but will likely have to settle for the 2.5 I5 model.

M

 

[DaSilva]

Has to be the TT, beautiful car.

My vote goes to the TT as well.. "God" I love the TT

 

[cawimmer430]

Audi A3 Sportback

 

[martinbo]

Audi A3 Sportback

Same here. It's the most complete all-rounder in this group. GTI runs it close but loses out in the classy stakes.

 

[ree]

This engine is pimped heavily by the VW group I see. It has no place in the A4 Cabriolet though, read SLOW. My choice for this engine is the U.S. Jetta GLI.

M

Hi Merci! Here in germany the A4 Cabriolet is avaible with the 2.0T engine - but we don't get the Jetta GLI with 2.5 litre engine!!

 

[Tumbo]

Audi A3 thank you