So, according to those data the Taycan is more likely a 9.5 sec 0-200 kph car (claimed is 9.8). That's 911 Turbo-territory right there...
The Taycan acceleration doesnt taper off at higher speeds like other electric cars.
second gear, which corresponds to the single gear of other EVs.
They have different motors with different characteristics. Porsche uses permanent Neodim magnet for the rotor, while Tesla is using an induction motor at the front, until recently also at the rear, but from several months they are mounting a reluctance motor (like the one in the Model 3). I have read somewhere that the Porsche engine has the widest rpm range or having higher maximum rpms. The fact that the two cars have similar max speed and the Porsche works at higher rpm means that even the second gear of Porsche is shorter than the first of the Tesla. Also the fact that the Taycan had a first gear which works up to 60 (don't remember km/h or mph) means that it is very short. But despite this the Tesla is still quicher from stillstand, which means that the Porsche motor has much lower torque at lower rpms.Are you sure about this? I know the gear ratios for Taycan are ~16 and ~8 and the 8 matches Model s only gear (8.28). But I don't know the final drive ratio for the Taycan (anyone?).
Model S on other hand has first gear ratio of 8.28 and a final drive ratio of 9.73. I suspect, between final drive and wheel size, the only gear in Model S is probably closer...
Shifting into second should make the Porsche slower not quicker. That means that the Tesla motor is having a decreasing torque with the increasing of the rpms, while the Porsche motor is weaker at lower rpms but much stronger at higher rpms.Are you sure about this? I know the gear ratios for Taycan are ~16 and ~8 and the 8 matches Model s only gear (8.28). But I don't know the final drive ratio for the Taycan (anyone?).
Model S on other hand has first gear ratio of 8.28 and a final drive ratio of 9.73. I suspect, between final drive and wheel size, the only gear in Model S is probably closer...
Shifting into second should make the Porsche slower not quicker.
That means that the Tesla motor is having a decreasing torque with the increasing of the rpms, while the Porsche motor is weaker at lower rpms but much stronger at higher rpms.
Thanks. I didn't know that ZF supply the gearbox.Available from ZF now.
![]()
ZF shifts up a gear: its new 2-speed electric drive for passenger cars integrates an advanced electric motor with a shift element and appropriate power electronics. The improvement in energy conversion efficiency compared to previous e-drives extends the driving range for each battery charge. An...
Sweeping victory for the Taycan. The Model S is way more practical though.
I wouldn’t be surprised TG is crap!
Interesting.
Interesting.
As I said many times before the Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor is by no way a match for the reluctance motor (used in Model 3 and from several months also in the model S). Porsche is one generation behind in the technology and I wonder way they made that strange choice.
There is no official information but it seems that BMW in its fifth gen motors is also shifting to the reluctance type motor, which is a step in the right direction.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.