Road tests The Official Car Lap Times Thread - Supertest Results / Acceleration / Track Battles etc...

[DeDe]

Just one thing I want to add : It's about how weak these specific 992.1 Turbo S figures are. 6.2s 100-200km/h has to be one of the slowest acceleration times I've seen for the 992.1, it's usually in the 5.8 and even 5.7s 100-200 range, which is exactly the time the 992.2 Turbo S achieved here. I totally remember a rolling race video where a stock Turbo S held a stock 570S on a roll, and the 570S is a 5.7s 100-200 car. So, all I'm really trying to say is that the difference in acceleration between the 992.1 Turbo S and 992.2 Turbo S is not as big as this Auto Motor und Sport data shows us. The cars are likely much closer in acceleration as the data suggests : The new Turbo S "loses" the power advantage it has by being heavier.

Auto Motor und Sport, Sport Auto and Autocar are the only magazines that tests with 2 people onboard. That is always a factor and the main reason why their times are usually the "slowest".

 

[Jo_Sta7]

Just one thing I want to add : It's about how weak these specific 992.1 Turbo S figures are. 6.2s 100-200km/h has to be one of the slowest acceleration times I've seen for the 992.1, it's usually in the 5.8 and even 5.7s 100-200 range, which is exactly the time the 992.2 Turbo S achieved here. I totally remember a rolling race video where a stock Turbo S held a stock 570S on a roll, and the 570S is a 5.7s 100-200 car. So, all I'm really trying to say is that the difference in acceleration between the 992.1 Turbo S and 992.2 Turbo S is not as big as this Auto Motor und Sport data shows us. The cars are likely much closer in acceleration as the data suggests : The new Turbo S "loses" the power advantage it has by being heavier.

If they're both AMUS, we'll have to wait for more tests to make such an assertion. Perhaps the delta remains the same.

 

[Rolf]

Auto Motor und Sport, Sport Auto and Autocar are the only magazines that tests with 2 people onboard. That is always a factor and the main reason why their times are usually the "slowest".

I would be interested to see the times from Autobild Sports Car I wonder if it will dip under 2.5sec to 100 and under 8sec to 200kmh.

 

[Rolf]

Autocar Road Test: Lamborghini Temerario

• Power, torque: 920 PS, 730 Nm
• Tyres: Bridgestone Potenza Race
• Weight (with fluids): 1905 kg
• 0 - 30mph: 1,3 s
• 0 - 60mph: 2,48 s
• 0-100 km/h: 2,6 s
• 0-100mph: 4,9 s
• 0-150mph: 10,2 s
• 0-180mph: 16,4 s
• Quarter mile: 10,0 s @147,2mph (236,9 km/h)
• Standing km: 18,0 s @184,5mph (296,9 km/h)

km/h-data estimates:
0-100 km/h: 2,6 s (measured)
0-200 km/h: 7,0 s
0-250 km/h: 11,0 s
0-300 km/h: 18,4 s

This must be the first road test of the Temerario. Pretty impressed by the performance figures they virtually the same as the Revualto

 

[DeDe]

I would be interested to see the times from Autobild Sports Car I wonder if it will dip under 2.5sec to 100 and under 8sec to 200kmh.

In January

 

[DeDe]

If they're both AMUS, we'll have to wait for more tests to make such an assertion. Perhaps the delta remains the same.

Both are AMuS data.