- Messages
- 15,481
- Name
- Rolf
They pretty close, but the Rimac is so much quicker on the straights and maybe Porsche is better under breaking and cornering
They pretty close, but the Rimac is so much quicker on the straights and maybe Porsche is better under breaking and cornering
Which is the better Huracan, the STO or the Performante?Sport Auto France Supertest - Lamborghini Huracan STO
![]()
Circuit Val de Vienne Lap Time - 1:57,40
Vmax: 262 km/h
Max Lateral G-Force: - / -
Track Conditions: 17deg C - Wet & Windy 14 km/h
Driver: Christophe Tinseau
Acceleration (km/h):
0-100: 3,0
0-160: 5,9
0-200: 8,9
0-400m: 10,6s @ 214 km/h
0-1000m: 19,5s @ 267 km/h
Braking:
200-0: 129 m
Weight: 1528 kg
Weight Distribution: 41/59%
Tire Brand: Bridgestone Potenza Sport (not sure why they mentioned tires used at the track: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2)
Tire Size: 245/30/20 | 305/30/20
Rating: 5/5
Price as tested: 487,334 €
![]()
On track Performante is probably even faster than the STO.Which is the better Huracan, the STO or the Performante?
Lambo had to swap the Potenza Race semislicks for Potenza Sport due to very wet conditions.Tire Brand: Bridgestone Potenza Sport (not sure why they mentioned tires used at the track: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2)
That 750S is simply sensational and in another league above the Corvette.
That 750S is simply sensational and in another league above the Corvette.
Haven't watched the video yet but I expected a 7:25 or thereabouts.Hm. Isn't that a let down? Just 1 sec quicker than the M4 Comp. xDrive was in the supertest ...
That was even my "minimal" expectation! I haven't read the article/test yet ... but there must be an explanation for this mediocre result by Christian Gebhardt!Haven't watched the video yet but I expected a 7:25 or thereabouts.
Good point! But what does that mean then: The CS variant isn't much quicker than the "normal" Competition xDrive on which it is based on! BMW ///M isn't doing official laptimes with non CS/CSL variants ... so we have to conclude it via sport auto laptime results ...Actually Gebhardt did well. His laptime was just 3.3 seconds slower than the laptime done by BMW M test driver Jorg Weidinger.
You pay for 2 seconds faster laptime, a bit faster acceleration and 20kg less weight 46.000€ more than what normal M3 Competition xDrive costs.Good point! But what does that mean then: The CS variant isn't much quicker than the "normal" Competition xDrive on which it is based on! BMW ///M isn't doing official laptimes with non CS/CSL variants ... so we have to conclude it via sport auto laptime results ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.