BMW The new BMW 7 Series.

Rolf · Thursday at 5:05 AM

Special said:
I’m disappointed with the facelift.

If the early images of the front end looked promising… and let’s say that in M Sport trim it isn’t bad (although there’s too much black plastic at the front)...

the rear is grotesque: completely disproportionate taillights and, above all, an excessive amount of black plastic. And it doesn’t stop there — even the side sills are covered in black plastic.

At this rate, the next facelift will probably look like this: fully black bumpers, black door handles, black mirrors and hubcaps… and the bimmer fans will still applauding... :

The biggest disappointment is, of course, the cockpit:

1.) We’ve lost BMW’s most iconic “detail,” which is the driver-oriented cockpit — a shame of all shames.
The wrap-around feeling that used to be typical of BMWs has now completely disappeared — a real shame, truly a shame..

2.) The screens are laughable too… they stand there like some aftermarket TomTom navigation units from 2010. There is no elegant integration into the cockpit (like in the Mercedes W223 facelift), if screens are already necessary... Also, the asymmetrical trapezoid shapes of the displays are completely inappropriate.

3.) Certain parts already look cheap even in photos. Thomas from Autogefühl, for example, clearly showed how cheap the window switch plastics are.

On one hand, BMW wants the 7 Series to compete in the top luxury segment, but on the other hand, it fails in materials quality.

4.) “Pure Excellence” was nicer before the facelift because it had a beautiful chrome strip along the sills (painted in body color) and a very tasteful, subtle chrome front lip that gave it a sporty touch. That is gone in the facelifted Pure Excellence, so it doesn’t look better anymore.

Just for fun, I had a design rendered showing how it could look better:
– The center console with the central display would again be angled toward the driver (BMW’s traditional layout)
– The passenger display would be angled slightly toward the passenger and better integrated
– The classic BMW orange illumination would be back
– And since even VW has introduced screens in their new EV that resemble 1980s instrument clusters, I added legendary BMW on-board computer displays from the 90s into the central screen area

I don’t know…
The 7 Series now wants to be some kind of cheaper Phantom. With that large upright grille, etc.

But in reality, the car has lost everything that the BMW 7 used to stand for — take the E38 as an example: sleekness, elegance, sportiness.
This new one is awkward, bloated, boxy, and massive — it looks like it’s been overtaken by time.
There is no beauty, no elegance, and even less grace....

Your dash design is brilliant and I like your idea of giving it a nod to the past with the driver angled screen and red lighting for the instruments and ambient lighting. It looks light years ahead of what BMW has actually done with the dash.

Except for the terrible design of the twin screens on the dash which I think looks just as bad as Audi latest dash screens the rest of the 7 series interior looks really good and the backseat is definitely the best place to be.

There are 2 more things I think BMW could have done better is they made the mistake like Mercedes with the S class by still keeping the ugly shiny Piano black trim surrounding the window switches. It would have been nice they used the same silver colour trim as the seat switch surround.

The rear fixed digital screen controls on the door for each passenger is a stupid idea and not practical and should be removable controls like what the S class has. You will have difficulty looking at the door all the time to adjust the seat or blinds.

slicknick · Thursday at 5:20 AM

Pointlessly enormous grill, weird looking rear lights and a vomit-inducing interior full of nothing but screens. I’d say OK if this were BYD, but sadly, it’s a BMW

Special · Thursday at 5:26 AM

Der Hofmeister said:
It is more a reason of aligning the model with the eco-awareness policy adopted by BMW. The Chrome Line Exterior package offered for the pre-LCI model and a standard equipment on former Design Pure Excellence has been replaced by BMW Individual Aluminium Line satinated package, albeit in a reduced form for the standard model with no specific details on the front and rear ends.

The car has lost some of its presence due to the missing chrome—at least 1% of the elegance it once had…
of course, purely and solely for cost-cutting reasons.

SKY · Thursday at 5:31 AM

Glad to see at least BMW has removed all chrome from the bumpers.

klier · Thursday at 5:43 AM

Special said:
I’m disappointed with the facelift.

If the early images of the front end looked promising… and let’s say that in M Sport trim it isn’t bad (although there’s too much black plastic at the front)...

the rear is grotesque: completely disproportionate taillights and, above all, an excessive amount of black plastic. And it doesn’t stop there — even the side sills are covered in black plastic.

At this rate, the next facelift will probably look like this: fully black bumpers, black door handles, black mirrors and hubcaps… and the bimmer fans will still applauding... :

The biggest disappointment is, of course, the cockpit:

1.) We’ve lost BMW’s most iconic “detail,” which is the driver-oriented cockpit — a shame of all shames.
The wrap-around feeling that used to be typical of BMWs has now completely disappeared — a real shame, truly a shame..

2.) The screens are laughable too… they stand there like some aftermarket TomTom navigation units from 2010. There is no elegant integration into the cockpit (like in the Mercedes W223 facelift), if screens are already necessary... Also, the asymmetrical trapezoid shapes of the displays are completely inappropriate.

3.) Certain parts already look cheap even in photos. Thomas from Autogefühl, for example, clearly showed how cheap the window switch plastics are.

On one hand, BMW wants the 7 Series to compete in the top luxury segment, but on the other hand, it fails in materials quality.

4.) “Pure Excellence” was nicer before the facelift because it had a beautiful chrome strip along the sills (painted in body color) and a very tasteful, subtle chrome front lip that gave it a sporty touch. That is gone in the facelifted Pure Excellence, so it doesn’t look better anymore.

Just for fun, I had a design rendered showing how it could look better:
– The center console with the central display would again be angled toward the driver (BMW’s traditional layout)
– The passenger display would be angled slightly toward the passenger and better integrated
– The classic BMW orange illumination would be back
– And since even VW has introduced screens in their new EV that resemble 1980s instrument clusters, I added legendary BMW on-board computer displays from the 90s into the central screen area

Guys! We found that Youtuber who draws the random lines! He finally became a member here.

Welcome, line drawer.

Special · Thursday at 5:44 AM

Rolf said:
Your dash design is brilliant and I like your idea of giving it a nod to the past with the driver angled screen and red lighting for the instruments and ambient lighting. It looks light years ahead of what BMW has actually done with the dash.

tnx man

I also prefer the “aluminum” finish on the seat adjustment buttons in the LCI 7er over that ugly piano black plastic in the mopf W223, but the buttons themselves still don’t feel premium (both the fake crystal-like plastic ones and the window switches).

Someone recently said it well: “If you want interior quality and materials like the A8, 7 Series, or S-Class had in the ’90s, you basically have to buy a Rolls-Royce or a Bentley today” — and unfortunately, that’s true.

I’d also add the current Lotus Emeya and Eletre — I haven’t seen such a well-executed interior in a long time (not even in a Bentley): even the rear parcel shelf is wrapped in leather, as are the interior sills and seat surrounds, and even the seat controls are made of aluminum — honestly, hats off to Lotus for that. Just look at the finishing on the buttons for example...or the fact that even the frunk is covered in plush.
You wont find a single plastic piece there.

THAT'S HOW A PROPER INTERIOR SHOULD LOOK LIKE:

klier · Thursday at 5:55 AM

fortuner said:
You will love it tomorrow

You were right!

Uygar · Thursday at 5:56 AM

Esp5 said:
I'm surprised that with your design knowledge, you can even compare them.
The rear is very well designed; I like how the trunk lid is sculpted, and the whole ensemble, along with the lights, seems to me one of the best aspect of the car. It basically looks like "a new model," giving it a fresh, solid, and modern feel that will last for years to come, much better than the pre-LCI in that aspect.

I mean yes, it does look like a completely new vehicle, but that doesn’t mean it’s good looking. All I’m seeing is a Lincoln with a BMW logo. They’re just way too long and don’t have the robotic / squared look of the front fascia.
So I don’t know, maybe it will grow on me, but for now it’s just odd. And don’t even get me started on that damn interior…

Design FIRST · Thursday at 6:01 AM

Special said:
tnx man

I also prefer the “aluminum” finish on the seat adjustment buttons in the LCI 7er over that ugly piano black plastic in the mopf W223, but the buttons themselves still don’t feel premium (both the fake crystal-like plastic ones and the window switches).

Someone recently said it well: “If you want interior quality and materials like the A8, 7 Series, or S-Class had in the ’90s, you basically have to buy a Rolls-Royce or a Bentley today” — and unfortunately, that’s true.

I’d also add the current Lotus Emeya and Eletre — I haven’t seen such a well-executed interior in a long time (not even in a Bentley): even the rear parcel shelf is wrapped in leather, as are the interior sills and seat surrounds, and even the seat controls are made of aluminum — honestly, hats off to Lotus for that. Just look at the finishing on the buttons for example...or the fact that even the frunk is covered in plush.
You wont find a single plastic piece there.

THAT'S HOW A PROPER INTERIOR SHOULD LOOK LIKE:

Must say, Chinese and Chinese/European joint venture manufacturers have been getting an awful lot "right" when it comes to interiors.

Uygar · Thursday at 6:02 AM

Special said:
tnx man

I also prefer the “aluminum” finish on the seat adjustment buttons in the LCI 7er over that ugly piano black plastic in the mopf W223, but the buttons themselves still don’t feel premium (both the fake crystal-like plastic ones and the window switches).

Someone recently said it well: “If you want interior quality and materials like the A8, 7 Series, or S-Class had in the ’90s, you basically have to buy a Rolls-Royce or a Bentley today” — and unfortunately, that’s true.
I’d also add the current Lotus Emeya and Eletre — I haven’t seen such a well-executed interior in a long time (not even in a Bentley): even the rear parcel shelf is wrapped in leather, as are the interior sills and seat surrounds, and even the seat controls are made of aluminum — honestly, hats off to Lotus for that. Just look at the finishing on the buttons for example...or the fact that even the frunk is covered in plush.
You wont find a single plastic piece there.

THAT'S HOW A PROPER INTERIOR SHOULD LOOK LIKE:

They look so good. I also think Genesis is doing great job at their interiors. A perfect combination of luxury and just enough screens.

Uygar · Thursday at 6:10 AM

Special said:
I’m disappointed with the facelift.

If the early images of the front end looked promising… and let’s say that in M Sport trim it isn’t bad (although there’s too much black plastic at the front)...

the rear is grotesque: completely disproportionate taillights and, above all, an excessive amount of black plastic. And it doesn’t stop there — even the side sills are covered in black plastic.

At this rate, the next facelift will probably look like this: fully black bumpers, black door handles, black mirrors and hubcaps… and the bimmer fans will still applauding... :

The biggest disappointment is, of course, the cockpit:

1.) We’ve lost BMW’s most iconic “detail,” which is the driver-oriented cockpit — a shame of all shames.
The wrap-around feeling that used to be typical of BMWs has now completely disappeared — a real shame, truly a shame..

2.) The screens are laughable too… they stand there like some aftermarket TomTom navigation units from 2010. There is no elegant integration into the cockpit (like in the Mercedes W223 facelift), if screens are already necessary... Also, the asymmetrical trapezoid shapes of the displays are completely inappropriate.

3.) Certain parts already look cheap even in photos. Thomas from Autogefühl, for example, clearly showed how cheap the window switch plastics are.

On one hand, BMW wants the 7 Series to compete in the top luxury segment, but on the other hand, it fails in materials quality.

4.) “Pure Excellence” was nicer before the facelift because it had a beautiful chrome strip along the sills (painted in body color) and a very tasteful, subtle chrome front lip that gave it a sporty touch. That is gone in the facelifted Pure Excellence, so it doesn’t look better anymore.

Just for fun, I had a design rendered showing how it could look better:
– The center console with the central display would again be angled toward the driver (BMW’s traditional layout)
– The passenger display would be angled slightly toward the passenger and better integrated
– The classic BMW orange illumination would be back
– And since even VW has introduced screens in their new EV that resemble 1980s instrument clusters, I added legendary BMW on-board computer displays from the 90s into the central screen area

I don’t know…
The 7 Series now wants to be some kind of cheaper Phantom. With that large upright grille, etc.

But in reality, the car has lost everything that the BMW 7 used to stand for — take the E38 as an example: sleekness, elegance, sportiness.
This new one is awkward, bloated, boxy, and massive — it looks like it’s been overtaken by time.
There is no beauty, no elegance, and even less grace....

For some reason that interior reminded me very much of the Vision Luxury concept.
It had a gorgeous interior as well.

martinbo · Thursday at 6:26 AM

The implementation of the passenger screen is a peeve for me. I'm amazed it's standard and not optional (I wrongly assumed it was) which is admirable from a features perspective at least. I guess if I was an actual BMW 7er buyer (like, never) I'd overlook the awkward aesthetic and appreciate the dick-measuring aspect of having a passenger screen as standard equipment.

I'm bemused by the rhetoric from many here that this interior isn't "befitting of luxury" or premium enough for this segment when we're comparing it to what exactly? Screen-based interfaces and the extensive level of integration of the UI with the rest of the vehicle's systems is the new norm. The favoured term of "cost cutting" here is inevitable as the wiring of physical buttons into increasingly software-controlled networks becomes ever more cost-ineffective. The reality is that everyone prefers a physical button but despite this, the current trend catering to app-hungry buyers (not us old-school "driver" farts) is to digitise the human-machine interface as far as possible. Like it or not.

Of course the layout and ergonomics of BMW's new interior design isn't going to be to all tastes. What's new? This has been the case ever since LCD screens first started to appear in the early nineties in BMW's horizontally partitioned dashboards. The days of E46 and E39 are long gone. There was a bit of an aesthetic respite with the F-generation which, by and large, seemed to integrate screen display with dashboard design in a visually appealing manner - but this was short-lived and in came the (once-again) polarising curved screen format which once more garnered criticism from the familiar corner.

I for one am impressed with the new design idiom for BMW's driver interface - I can visualise how the panaromic display will be appealing and the centre display ergonomically better compared to the curved display. Each manufacturer has their approach. Owing to what amounts to little more than brand loyalty of actual buyers, each approach will appeal and repel in equal measure. I look forward to owning and using cars with this new tech.

Truthfully, I am biased towards BMW as a customer. I have had nothing but exceptional service and support from dealerships as well as BMW South Africa (that's a helluva story for another time, but imagine cataclysmic flooding in Kruger) and so, God-willingly, given the means I will continue to buy BMWs for as long as it may be.

Based on too many years' experience here, I feel there are very few here who are genuinely objective in their appraisal of this (to my mind, very successful) LCI. I think the front-end is a huge improvement; the protuberance of the "shnozz" grill has been addressed well enough and, in all but direct side-on view, the frontal design appears less nose-heavy. The rear lights are a non-event for me - they're simply in line with a new design direction for the brand, just like Merc's hideous light-bar-that's-not-a-light-bar on their recent models.

Sure, we're all here to discuss and debate (argue?) the merits and demerits of this fresh take on the G70 but let's be realistic: nothing in what we'll be saying will have any effect on the sales performance of this car or its direct rival. Luxury sedans losing ground to luxury SUVs is a far more prevalent factor than the "objective appraisal" going on here from all but a few reasonable contributors.

AbsoluteUnit · Thursday at 6:56 AM

martinbo said:
The implementation of the passenger screen is a peeve for me. I'm amazed it's standard and not optional (I wrongly assumed it was) which is admirable from a features perspective at least. I guess if I was an actual BMW 7er buyer (like, never) I'd overlook the awkward aesthetic and appreciate the dick-measuring aspect of having a passenger screen as standard equipment.

I'm bemused by the rhetoric from many here that this interior isn't "befitting of luxury" or premium enough for this segment when we're comparing it to what exactly? Screen-based interfaces and the extensive level of integration of the UI with the rest of the vehicle's systems is the new norm. The favoured term of "cost cutting" here is inevitable as the wiring of physical buttons into increasingly software-controlled networks becomes ever more cost-ineffective. The reality is that everyone prefers a physical button but despite this, the current trend catering to app-hungry buyers (not us old-school "driver" farts) is to digitise the human-machine interface as far as possible. Like it or not.

Of course the layout and ergonomics of BMW's new interior design isn't going to be to all tastes. What's new? This has been the case ever since LCD screens first started to appear in the early nineties in BMW's horizontally partitioned dashboards. The days of E46 and E39 are long gone. There was a bit of an aesthetic respite with the F-generation which, by and large, seemed to integrate screen display with dashboard design in a visually appealing manner - but this was short-lived and in came the (once-again) polarising curved screen format which once more garnered criticism from the familiar corner.

I for one am impressed with the new design idiom for BMW's driver interface - I can visualise how the panaromic display will be appealing and the centre display ergonomically better compared to the curved display. Each manufacturer has their approach. Owing to what amounts to little more than brand loyalty of actual buyers, each approach will appeal and repel in equal measure. I look forward to owning and using cars with this new tech.

Truthfully, I am biased towards BMW as a customer. I have had nothing but exceptional service and support from dealerships as well as BMW South Africa (that's a helluva story for another time, but imagine cataclysmic flooding in Kruger) and so, God-willingly, given the means I will continue to buy BMWs for as long as it may be.

Based on too many years' experience here, I feel there are very few here who are genuinely objective in their appraisal of this (to my mind, very successful) LCI. I think the front-end is a huge improvement; the protuberance of the "shnozz" grill has been addressed well enough and, in all but direct side-on view, the frontal design appears less nose-heavy. The rear lights are a non-event for me - they're simply in line with a new design direction for the brand, just like Merc's hideous light-bar-that's-not-a-light-bar on their recent models.

Sure, we're all here to discuss and debate (argue?) the merits and demerits of this fresh take on the G70 but let's be realistic: nothing in what we'll be saying will have any effect on the sales performance of this car or its direct rival. Luxury sedans losing ground to luxury SUVs is a far more prevalent factor than the "objective appraisal" going on here from all but a few reasonable contributors.

You could make that argument for any of the cars recently refreshed or released. But this is a forum after all. What's the point, if not to discuss the meaningless minutia.

As for the interior discourse. Its fine. But, is "fine" good enough for the $140,000 flagship? Is it okay, that it looks visually identical to the i3, but with an extra screen tacked on?
Its the same with the S-class. Its fine. But is that good enough? Is it good enough for it to just be a juiced up E-class interior?

To me, neither are. I don't care much, because I can't afford either. But, I expect more. Will both work, and be functional, and offer exactly what a buyer would expect? Yes. Could they both be a lot better? Also yes.

advantage20 · Thursday at 6:57 AM

Special said:
I’m disappointed with the facelift.

If the early images of the front end looked promising… and let’s say that in M Sport trim it isn’t bad (although there’s too much black plastic at the front)...

the rear is grotesque: completely disproportionate taillights and, above all, an excessive amount of black plastic. And it doesn’t stop there — even the side sills are covered in black plastic.

At this rate, the next facelift will probably look like this: fully black bumpers, black door handles, black mirrors and hubcaps… and the bimmer fans will still applauding... :

The biggest disappointment is, of course, the cockpit:

1.) We’ve lost BMW’s most iconic “detail,” which is the driver-oriented cockpit — a shame of all shames.
The wrap-around feeling that used to be typical of BMWs has now completely disappeared — a real shame, truly a shame..

2.) The screens are laughable too… they stand there like some aftermarket TomTom navigation units from 2010. There is no elegant integration into the cockpit (like in the Mercedes W223 facelift), if screens are already necessary... Also, the asymmetrical trapezoid shapes of the displays are completely inappropriate.

3.) Certain parts already look cheap even in photos. Thomas from Autogefühl, for example, clearly showed how cheap the window switch plastics are.

On one hand, BMW wants the 7 Series to compete in the top luxury segment, but on the other hand, it fails in materials quality.

4.) “Pure Excellence” was nicer before the facelift because it had a beautiful chrome strip along the sills (painted in body color) and a very tasteful, subtle chrome front lip that gave it a sporty touch. That is gone in the facelifted Pure Excellence, so it doesn’t look better anymore.

Just for fun, I had a design rendered showing how it could look better:
– The center console with the central display would again be angled toward the driver (BMW’s traditional layout)
– The passenger display would be angled slightly toward the passenger and better integrated
– The classic BMW orange illumination would be back
– And since even VW has introduced screens in their new EV that resemble 1980s instrument clusters, I added legendary BMW on-board computer displays from the 90s into the central screen area

I don’t know…
The 7 Series now wants to be some kind of cheaper Phantom. With that large upright grille, etc.

But in reality, the car has lost everything that the BMW 7 used to stand for — take the E38 as an example: sleekness, elegance, sportiness.
This new one is awkward, bloated, boxy, and massive — it looks like it’s been overtaken by time.
There is no beauty, no elegance, and even less grace....

Yeah the tail lights are definitely out of proportion and give off a weird Japanese cross-eyed art vibe (on top of Uygar's Oldsmobile reference if I'm not mistaken, couldn't put my finger on it!)

The i3's tail lights also look more Asian than German but are sharp, precise and proportionate in comparison

0kcaXIT4rehRJeV4gDrj7QtRdkczUS0_I8T3RCm7UPJgy&s=10.webp

Brilliant interior redesign with the integrated screens and amber illumination, by the way; I'm sure the amber theme will come back at some point, after everyone will have had enough of this pure/clean/inoffensive white/blue theme that is currently being used (which is very nice itself).

fan_of_642 · Thursday at 6:59 AM

I like the rear. Absolutely NOTHING else.
It's shocking to think, all customers are satisfied to look onto a bloody steering wheel brace instead of nicely designed classic instruments.

Today it seems that only VW is on the right way.
Hear. Understand. Decide.

Yes, you can propose best technology and future assets (level 2++).
Yes, you should propose displays for many informations and leisure.
But, you should never forget an good old-style usability and real valuable surfaces and finishment.

BMW and MB are failing.

Matski · Thursday at 7:07 AM

Esp5 said:
Wow, one left and two arrived

Mr. Mercedes said:
Please, this is far from trolling.

Esp5 is likely referring to returning banned members, rather than post content. On this occasion he's partially right as there's bot farms with less banned accounts on here than Sonder.

martinbo · Thursday at 7:26 AM

AbsoluteUnit said:
You could make that argument for any of the cars recently refreshed or released. But this is a forum after all. What's the point, if not to discuss the meaningless minutia.

As for the interior discourse. Its fine. But, is "fine" good enough for the $140,000 flagship? Is it okay, that it looks visually identical to the i3, but with an extra screen tacked on?
Its the same with the S-class. Its fine. But is that good enough? Is it good enough for it to just be a juiced up E-class interior?

To me, neither are. I don't care much, because I can't afford either. But, I expect more. Will both work, and be functional, and offer exactly what a buyer would expect? Yes. Could they both be a lot better? Also yes.

I don't disagree with you one bit.

What attracts my attention is the critique in isolation of a particular marque's solution without broader perspective from so many here (not you).
Barring "artisinal" exotica and cars like a pukka Range Rover or Rolls Royce, anything else even approaching mainstream production suffers a similar affliction. Let's take Porsche's 992 as an example - the dashboard has been adapted to cater for increased digitisation where the displays and UI are more extensive than ever. However, look beyond all the flashy graphics and you'll find the lowest-quality interior from a materials perspective since 996. In stock appointment, it's Golf-level at best, rescued by the options boxes for leather covered dashboard and interior trim stitching.
But on a car like a 911 GTS, this level of interior material and build quality is woefully sub-par.

I agree that it ought to be better but this is an industry-wide situation - somewhere, something's got to give - and I don't see any other maker doing it better across the board.

SaltkjelenBMW · Thursday at 8:00 AM

It's unnecessary to cheap out on all details about the car. The previous model had many beautiful and high quality elements that they removed or cheapened out on now.

The old center console had cup holder covers, real wood and beautiful details. I can't say the same about the LCI.

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.12.01.webp

The silver details in the pre-LCI vas galvanic/"metal" coated plastic. Now it seems like its just silver painted plastic. It's also less use of the silver trims which make it feels cheaper.

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.12.48.webp

The integration of the front view camera and washer system was way more sexy before. Now they are off center, which also make a "off center line" in the grill. Small thing, but they could do it better.

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.13.44.webp

As for the front, they cheapened out on the rear view camera. The camera was smooth integrated in the black part of the BMW roundel and wasn't visible. Now its off center again and does not longer have washer? Anyway - the previous one was like an "cool over engineered german thing".

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.15.24.webp

Less details with the B&W system. No more illuminated speaker in front and no more aluminium trim cover. It's difficult to tell by the pictures and the videos, but it remains me of aluminium inspirated plastic cover and not real aluminium anymore (?). Its inconsistent to have the "real B&W" look for the rear doors and not in the front doors. It's similar in the G60 where the B&W system is "Plastic&Wilkins".

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.16.06.webp

The pre-LCI G70 wasn't perfect, but I felt it was better than the LCI. BMW has always made the front and rear doors "match" with the lines, but they started to cheapen out for the rear doors with the G70/G60++. As they redesigned the front door panels, they are now completely "out of line" with the rear doors.

Skjermbilde 2026-04-23 kl. 13.33.47.webp

Mr. Mercedes · Thursday at 8:07 AM

martinbo said:
But on a car like a 911 GTS, this level of interior material and build quality is woefully sub-par.

I know its off topic, and I'm no great defender of the 911 interior; it costs a f#cking fortune to make it feel special enough, but the build quality is solid.

martinbo · Thursday at 8:26 AM

Mr. Mercedes said:
but the build quality is solid.

Hmm, not to the same extent as 991.2 (trust me, you don't want to let this old fart near your 992's interior for a critique) but let's leave it out of this thread. I've harped on enough about that!

BMW The new BMW 7 Series.

Attachments

Engineered like no other car in the world

Attachments

Driving Dynamics Pro

Tarmac Traveler

Kraftwagen König

Velocity Virtuoso

Tarmac Traveler

Velocity Virtuoso

Chicane Challenger

Track Technician

Chicane Challenger

Chicane Challenger

Tarmac Titan

M-Sport Meister

High-Rev Hero

Turbo Tüftler

Kraftwagen König

Tarmac Titan

Schwarzwald Sprinter

Kraftwagen König

Tarmac Titan

Similar threads

Trending content

We value your privacy