Just engaged in an entertaining journey through the photo gallery
Jaguar E type is a very, very pretty car. But most beautiful? Not a single chance. And before "beauty is subjective" argument, I've quite solid and objective ones.
From lesser to more important:
-The oval grill and lights make it look a bit catfish-y. Doesn't happen with similary designed contemporaries: 250 GTO, Alfa TZ2, Aston DP212/4/5, Shelby Daytona Coupè.
-Wheels tucked into wells/arches. Ruins stance and a good reason why most sports cars have avoided that look.
-Windshield too upright; and massive glass-to-metal (side panels) relation. Again, something that has been avoided ever since.
-The rear is a disaster. Did they forget to design it? The hatchback door, the ever rising lower part and exposed pipes....
Jag E Type...
Versus the mentioned cars from its era and style:
McLaren 570, Aventador, Gallardo,
Ford Capri, most of the american cars and half of the british, current Range Rover, Evoque, all Bentley, specially 2002 Continental. What a joke!
Massive omissions, IMHO: many Delage and Delahaye, along the most beautiful pre WWII cars, and much prettier than all those damm Bentleys or the Morgan 3 wheeler, FFS.
Alfa 2500 SS coupe or 2900B, again, way nicer than the pre war Alfas they selected (1750, 2500 ss spider, 2900 spider)
Thunderbird 56, instead of 61 Continental, Charger or Buick Riviera.
No Mercedes W111, 190 SL, Peugeot 504.
BMW M1: Giugiaro's masterpiece; a pure geometry, "architecture details" filled design which could easily had come from the minds of Louis Kahn, Mario Botta or Carlo Scarpa.
Where are first gen Corvette, Opel GT, Toyota 2000GT? And yet Lotus Elan is there....

They included Aston DB3s, DB4, DB4 cabrio, DB4 Zagato, DB5, Jaguar XK120 and XKKS and not Maserati's 3500 GT/5000 GT or Sebring? Lancia Fulvia coupè or Flaminia Zagato?
Ahhh, the british chauvinism