
The debate on hand here is that the E90 is actually a darned nice vehicle to look at when one removes the sentimental rose-tinted glasses of faded memories. Certainly, to my mind it looks better than both the C-Class and the new A4 and yet, it's the oldest of the three.
Well, you like the Subarus, so...![]()

From German descent, but proudly South-African! Please to meet you my fellow countrymen!^ Hmmm, and I thought you were German! Not a fellow South African. Interesting - explains many things.
The interior quality of the E46 was exceptional. But, here's the news flash - most car makers are downgrading the quality of their interior plastics for two reasons: lowered input costs and material recyclability. So, you will find harder, lower polyurethane content dashboard materials in many modern cars compared with their predecessors.
The debate on hand here is that the E90 is actually a darned nice vehicle to look at when one removes the sentimental rose-tinted glasses of faded memories. Certainly, to my mind it looks better than both the C-Class and the new A4 and yet, it's the oldest of the three.

^ The same can and is being said about the B8 A4 vs. the B7
I will give that to my wife's car, done 20 000km - no rattles. But matt and soft touch is a must for a premium product with a premium price.....Human... Een van my kollegas stuur vir my 'n email wat sê dis "Moer Koud!". Maar ja, bietjie warmer vandag dink ek! LOL
[We're not really allowed to delve into local lingo on this forum...]
Plastic quality is also a very subjective thing. Just because the plastic surface doesn't depress 0.2 mm with a well-aimed finger prod and now the car is perceived as poor quality in general. I think a 1er is very nicely screwed together, despite some harder plastics being used. As long as it doesn't rattle - I'm happy.
That's a good point. So you're saying that because I like Subarus as an owner, driver and instructor that I have questionable taste in car styling? Nice try- you are so a lawyer.
Understand this, I know better that anyone you've ever met or spoken to on any internet forum why a Subaru looks the way it does. Yes, lately they've got dodgy styling but much of that stems from what's underneath the sheetmetal. [Combined with a complete lack of design direction]
Now, because I can appreciate the merits of technically impressive yet dull-looking Subarus, this places me in a far better position to judge the styling of cars from makers of all kinds who have less self-imposed constraints placed upon them.
Car styling is a secret favourite topic of mine. I spend a lot of time reading up on car design, terminology and technical rules. If you have a plain old objective look at an E90 you will see that - according to established schools of thought - the 3er is:
a. Perfectly proportioned: (3 & 1/2 wheel rule wheelbase; A-pillar line intersects with front wheel centre; rear wheel centre aligns with centre of C-pillar; DLO is 1/3 of total height of the vehicle; bottom door shutline lines up perfectly with wheel centres; and so on...) [Notice I didn't even mention the over-used "short front overhang" point]
b. Instantly recognisable as nothing but a BMW: strong DRG.
c. Through the use of modern metal surfacing has the necessary visual tension to create a sporty, dynamic image - even when the car is stationary
So tell me, is that enough of an informed opinion for you despite my appreciation for the only car that's never let me down. Ever.
![]()

I woud say that this has much more in common with the incoming F10 5er.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.