Comparison tests Porsche 918 vs McLaren P1 vs LaFerrari


Both 918 and P1 have been tested by numerous mags in the 19 and 20 sec bracket from 0-300km/h. Autocar got 0-180mph (290kmh) in 18sec for both cars (P1 got approx 20.1sec to 300kmh) and AMS/AS got 19.1sec to 300kmh for the 918 and Autozeitung got 19.5sec to 300kmh for same car.
 
So virtually despite all of their differences in power, weight, and automotive technology, there would only be a difference around a track by a couple of tenths a second and that would mostly be due to tires.
 
(I think this might be Car and Driver.) This is a bit old though but I thought it be interesting.
image.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emu
Interesting, so I guess that's about 1545kg with no driver and a full tank, throwing in 5kg for clothes and boots. Has anyone weighed a 918?

Yes, sportauto did in their 'super test' of the 918. 1642 kg (WS package) with a full tank. Look at page 18 of this thread for the scans, there you will find a table where it states 'vollgetankt' (German for a full tank) against the weight.
 
Yes, sportauto did in their 'super test' of the 918. 1642 kg (WS package) with a full tank. Look at page 18 of this thread for the scans, there you will find a table where it states 'vollgetankt' (German for a full tank) against the weight.

I just double checked, the field is entitled: "Gewicht vollgetankt" = weight with a full tank.
 
I think the real world weight difference is, 70kg to 100kg, but more important the 918 has the weight in the right place, ie very low down.......
 
When will TG do this comparison any dates mentioned when the next issue will come out and we can see results?
 
The Motortrend test you quote, was for an XP, not a production car,? also think you will find that the Autocar figs to 200mph, work back to a 0-300kph, in the late 18s,?
Only if it does 186-200mph in just over 1s. It should also be noted that the Weissach 918 measured on the same day took just under 30s and we've seen faster times for that. Conditions etc.

If you look at Autocar's quarter time, measured during the 0-200mph run, it hits 147.5mph in 10.2s, so the next 52.5mph to 200mph takes ~9.8s, or 0.98s for every 5.25mph assuming uniform acceleration (which is not the case due to drag depending on v^2). If you add 7 lots of that to the MT quarter time (9.8@149mph) you get 16.64s to 185.75mph. Again this assumes uniform acceleration, in reality the 150-186mph will involve faster acceleration than 186-200mph.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/mclaren/p1/performance

The factory claim is definitely reasonable and there's no reason to doubt it.
 
Both 918 and P1 have been tested by numerous mags in the 19 and 20 sec bracket from 0-300km/h. Autocar got 0-180mph (290kmh) in 18sec for both cars (P1 got approx 20.1sec to 300kmh) and AMS/AS got 19.1sec to 300kmh for the 918 and Autozeitung got 19.5sec to 300kmh for same car.
See second column first paragraph.

4727bda8039289f23438f291854a9ca0-jpg.313652.webp

1b579f16498d3373075256ec95890741-jpg.313653.webp
 
Thanks R,
So have any of the P1 performance claims been met?


https://twitter.com/evomagazine
918-P1 Track time Anglesey out later today.
I fully expect the 918 to be quicker there, just as it was on the Autocar Dry Handling track. There's simply no physical way a RWD car can put down 900hp better than an AWD car out of slow corners. What I'd like to see is a comparison on a GP track like Monza, Spa, Suzuka or Fuji etc.
 
See second column first paragraph.

4727bda8039289f23438f291854a9ca0-jpg.313652.webp

1b579f16498d3373075256ec95890741-jpg.313653.webp
See second column first paragraph.

4727bda8039289f23438f291854a9ca0-jpg.313652.webp

1b579f16498d3373075256ec95890741-jpg.313653.webp
I totally disagree with the figure Autocar achieved to 200mph with this 918 test car as it is the same test car AM und Sport/Autozeitung and Auto Sport used and they all achieved 19.1/19.5sec to 300km/h. If you look at the Auto Sport video on YT of the same 918 acceleration up to 333km/h, you will notice it takes about 25-26sec to achieve 330km/h. If you watch Autocars video where the P1 and 918 race the Ducatti bike only after about 21sec will the P1 then overtake the 918 which would translate into a speed of about 300 to 310km/h (look at my comments on Autocar website about the video although it was edited and replied by Steve Sutcliff).
 
I totally disagree with the figure Autocar achieved to 200mph with this 918 test car as it is the same test car AM und Sport/Autozeitung and Auto Sport used and they all achieved 19.1/19.5sec to 300km/h. If you look at the Auto Sport video on YT of the same 918 acceleration up to 333km/h, you will notice it takes about 25-26sec to achieve 330km/h. If you watch Autocars video where the P1 and 918 race the Ducatti bike only after about 21sec will the P1 then overtake the 918 which would translate into a speed of about 300 to 310km/h (look at my comments on Autocar website about the video although it was edited and replied by Steve Sutcliff).
Two things to note are different day, different place equals different conditions, head wind etc. To overtake you need to be going faster. The race starts at 3:56, at 3:16 the P1 clock says 198mph, so the P1 is going maybe 10mph faster than the 918 at this point (assuming no editing and accurate speedometer for the P1 - I suspect the 918 clock is over-reading at 3:14 otherwise it wouldn't be getting overtaken).

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

2131c9518aeb58cdf1dc2a5f7b8d89d9.webp

795d333bc588d46eff17fc5418b056be.webp
 
Only if it does 186-200mph in just over 1s. It should also be noted that the Weissach 918 measured on the same day took just under 30s and we've seen faster times for that. Conditions etc.

If you look at Autocar's quarter time, measured during the 0-200mph run, it hits 147.5mph in 10.2s, so the next 52.5mph to 200mph takes ~9.8s, or 0.98s for every 5.25mph assuming uniform acceleration (which is not the case due to drag depending on v^2). If you add 7 lots of that to the MT quarter time (9.8@149mph) you get 16.64s to 185.75mph. Again this assumes uniform acceleration, in reality the 150-186mph will involve faster acceleration than 186-200mph.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/mclaren/p1/performance

The factory claim is definitely reasonable and there's no reason to doubt it.
 
Emu,
everything is counted and published regarding these two cars. 918 is faster everywhere, except top speed range.
No need to interpretate anymore.
Tonight is the last punch in Mclaren's face.
 
Think we all know that the Autocar test is not correct, the 918 was not run in HL mode for starters, several well respected Jurnos have all tested the same car and all arrived at different results, says it all....

The Fact still remains yet to see any of the Claims made good, performance, braking, etc
 
Emu,
everything is counted and published regarding these two cars. 918 is faster everywhere, except top speed range.
No need to interpretate anymore.
Tonight is the last punch in Mclaren's face.
Come now, you can't judge a car designed for GP tracks based on its performance on club tracks relative to an AWD car.

f165eda9248c3110ce63591113760517.webp
 

Trending content


Back
Top