Summary (short version):
"Better is not quicker; better is more engaging and more feelsome."
Summary (longer version):
Ferrari: "more adjustable brakes and a sharper throttle response. Playful and engaging."
McLaren: "corners in a less flustered fashion, more quickly but no more satisfyingly. Flattering and inert."
McLaren is faster in objective performance, but on a winding road, the on-paper difference in stats is pointless.
McLaren is also faster on circuit, but these are road cars. "Outright circuit speed is not entirely the point."
In short, you can have a well-executed supercar, faster than another, more composed on demanding roads, but that doesn't make it better. Ferrari "better knows how to make a supercar" because of the subjective qualities that the 458 has over the McLaren. It's a little less stable, but "you get the impression that the Ferrari is trying to impress - to encourage you to have a good time. You may be driving to the shops but, damn it man, enjoy yourself." In other words, marginal differences in speed against another car is meaningless, unless you buy the car for the expressed purpose of beating that other car on track. Which is pretty pointless even for professional circuit racers.
The title was absolutely no surprise to me. Sutcliffe (as well as Chris Harris) had considerable reservations about declaring the McLaren the better car in the initial drive. And for good reason, as this article demonstrates. Imagine stepping out of a car like the McLaren (which they felt was for sure more composed and faster), but not being able to say with certainty that it was better than a car they had driven weeks or months earlier. That the lingering memory is so powerful is quite remarkable.


Given the context of such tests (subjective driving impressions on gnarly, rutted UK B-roads), it's not too surprising that a Jag could beat an M6. Jaguar does a lot of development and fine-tuning on such roads, while BMW probably doesn't. UK mags may be nationalists just like any other nationalities rooting for their home product, but they can also be critical of the home product. The AMV8, when it was released, fell short of expectation when compared against the 911, and Aston were apparently so bothered by this they had a sitdown with some UK press; thus, the revised AMV8 was a sharper car.the surprise is that sometimes the UK magazinec are a bit '"nationalists" (Ex:... "XKR beats M6"...).

Additional infos from Sport Auto's short test:
- Weight with full tank of fuel: 1451 kg
- Acceleration ("by optimal conditions"), full tank of fuel, 2 persons on board, on Corsa tyres: 0-100 km/h in 3,4 s, 0-200 km/h: 9,8 s.
- Acceleration ("by optimal conditions"), 1/3 tank of fuel, 1 person on board, on Corsa tyres: 0-100 km/h in 3,2 s, 0-200 km/h: 9,2 s.
- Braking: the ABS-setup is no perfect, the 100-0 km/h distances are not sensational: 36,7 m (cold) and 35,3 m (warm).
- Hockenheimring: 1.08,7 min - in Track Mode after one hot lap.
![]()


We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.