Hot V8?
Sense plays little part in the purchase of a hypercar.
madness. absolute madness.
Yeah I saw it. Hot V perhaps? We need a video of the presentation.![]()
The 0.77hp/kg is for the 1400hp I3 version - for 1818kg.
- "Hot V8" instead of "hot V"
- "0.77 hp/kg", which implies a 2987 kg female African elephant weight; but since according to Christian the weight is "substantially less than two tons" then it has to be just a math fluke and it's actually the other way around i.e. 0.77 kg/hp, which implies a 1771 kg weight -- but that doesn't add up either given the previously reported 2070 kg for just the inline-3
- "Tourbillon" should be pronounced [tourbilyon] or ideally [tourbiyon] like in French, which you'd think someone like Christian would know from the world of high-end watchmaking
- "Full size" instead of "full-size" (adjective), "carry on" instead of "carry-on" (noun or adjective)
- If you're abbreviating newton-metre according to convention ("Nm"), then you should also abbreviate kilowatt according to convention ("kW")
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not trying to nitpick on purpose as bad spelling doesn't necessarily mean bad engineering, but at such a premium price point you'd also expect flawless brand communication, which is the easiest part. I'd been wondering how such a small company could come up with such mind-boggling innovations and record numbers over and over again compared to more established manufacturers. Is Koenigsegg indeed a bunch of mad scientist geniuses at work? In which case lack of rigor in communication doesn't matter as much if they're applying the greatest rigor to engineering some of the best cars out there -- to the point where they aren't even trying to put any effort into premium feel and brand appeal like everyone else is. Too bad for the missed opportunity of finishing the job (would you imagine Bugatti being this sloppy?), but not vital as they're still selling every single unit produced.
Now apparently Koenigsegg aren't organizing press drives either? If the only way to check theit claims is through privately owned cars, then if it somehow happens the cars underdeliver there is always the possibility to blame the owners for having done something wrong to them, and even leaving that idea open feels cheap. And yet there seem to be legit Guinness records out there. It's really puzzling and it seems like no one really knows for sure, is mysticism a clever part of their strategy or is it just plain dumb amateurism? All of this carelessness doesn't really encourage one to even find out, and definitely wouldn't appeal to me if I were a prospective buyer, but they don't seem to care who buys their cars -- which ultimately makes it look as though they're just in it for the business at this point, and I'd like to be wrong.
PS: how to spot a Nordic:
![]()
(charming inability to pronounce the [z] sound)
- "0.77 hp/kg", which implies a 2987 kg female African elephant weight; but since according to Christian the weight is "substantially less than two tons" then it has to be just a math fluke and it's actually the other way around i.e. 0.77 kg/hp, which implies a 1771 kg weight -- but that doesn't add up either given the previously reported 2070 kg for just the inline-3
This car has a lot going on: door length, occupant capacity, cargo space, fuel tank, drive train. I don’t know whether I should be impressed or worried.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.