Jeep [Official] Jeep Cherokee (KL)


Jeep is an American automobile brand, now owned by multi-national corporation Stellantis. Jeep has been part of Chrysler since 1987, when Chrysler acquired the Jeep brand, along with other assets, from its previous owner, American Motors Corporation (AMC). Official website: Jeep
Blimey, I thought you lot were engineers/ingenieurs with a decent bit of IQ.

Good grief. Martin has given you an enormous amount of leeway when it comes to your attitude, and he has been very generous so far, as have the other mods, yet you still are not taking any notice to the advice given about your attitude. You clearly know an awful lot so why on Earth do you have to be so insulting?
 
1817dec43dec4e4cef373612dbd46db4.webp
b974506c4f1887633026c1ccb70cddb8.webp

:LOL:

KIA got some of their own medicine! KIA got COPIED! :ROFLMAO:

Gastly little Jeep isn't it:wtf: Sportage Copy......


 
I'm telling you, this product could well be the sleeper of the year. all the dunderheads are calling it out as the next Aztek or Edsel. .

Dunderheads (whatever that means)? Let me add to their chorus then. This piece of $%## is one of the most ugly, disgusting, ridiculously over shaped pieces of turd that I have ever seen.:sick:
 
This article is hilarious! They only got to present 2 desing proposals and this is the best they had? I'm still trying to figure out if the chief designer is actually serious or taking the micky. You make a statment by building a bloody gorgeous vehicle. Not by giving us one that was beaten with the ugly stick.

Jeep defends wild Cherokee design

http://www.carsales.com.au/news/2013/jeep-defends-wild-cherokee-design-35928

Jeep has defended the controversial styling of its all-new Cherokee SUV, which made its global debut at last week’s New York motor show and goes on sale priced from around $30,000 in October.
Internet bloggers went into overdrive when the redesigned American off-roader when it was officially pre-revealed in February, with the vast majority disparaging the new Cherokee’s pointy-nosed, split-headlight styling.
However, Jeep has hit back at critics of the bold new, saying the radical new design was not only progressive and enduring, but necessary for the success of the vital new model in a booming SUV sector awash with new arrivals.
Chief designer Mark Allen said in New York that when Fiat Chrysler’s top brass, including CEO Sergio Marchionne, were presented two design proposals for the next Cherokee, they overwhelmingly voted for the wilder option.
“Everyone wants to know how we came to this answer,” he admitted. “Trust me, we offered up to our management – and you've got to give them full credit – ‘mild to wild’ for this exterior look, and they all picked wild.
“Mild was never going to be competitive in this segment. We wanted to hit the segment running. The mood was to move aggressively with this vehicle. It’s got to stand on its own. It’s got to be modern. It’s got to go on a while.
“The decision seemed to be easy. That’s the best result for a designer.”
Allen admitted that some people, both inside the company and out, remained unsympathetic to the distinctive design, which was revealed about six months before it hits North American showrooms following production in Ohio from May, presumably to get customers used to the idea.
“Some people have struggled with the front-end, but they’re coming around. Some of the photos haven’t been flattering.
I’ve been looking at it for a couple of years so I’m used to it.
“Everybody just kept gravitating towards this. It was just the most modern thing we had up on the board.
“We did not want a box. A box looks very inefficient. This vehicle is very efficient, and we wanted to communicate that with the shape.
“If you look at the face of the vehicle, there is no corner on it. Splitting the lights and moving the lights around there allowed us to really rake back the front of the vehicle.
“If you think about the beloved (1980s) XJ Cherokee, that was radically different from the vehicle that it replaced. They weren’t looking back when they were doing that vehicle back then and neither does this.”
Allen said the new Cherokee would offer a significant point of difference from other new medium SUVs, including the Mazda CX-5, Nissan X-TRAIL, Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander – as well as the model it replaces.
“We were out of the market with the old Liberty (Cherokee),” he said. “That just wasn’t competitive with the set that’s out there right now. Management didn’t just want us to ease into that segment. They wanted everybody to know that we are here.”
Falling into line with its key mid-size rivals, the new model is smaller than the old Cherokee (which was badged as the Liberty outside Australia, where Subaru’s Legacy wears the same name), but significantly larger than Jeep’s compact Patriot and Compass SUVs, which will merge into a single model in their next generation.
Moving from a body-on-frame design to Fiat Chrysler’s new monococque platform from the Dodge Dart and Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Jeep maintains the new Cherokee five-seater is “the most capable mid-size SUV on the planet”.
Jeep has already revealed full specifications, including three different four-wheel drive systems, two transverse petrol engines (2.4 and 3.2-litre) and a 2.0-litre turbo-diesel – all matched to an SUV-first nine-speed automatic transmission – more than 70 advanced safety and security features including 10 airbags and four equipment grades.
They will include the entry-level front-wheel drive Sport, the mid-range Longitude (known as Latitude in the US, where the Renault of the same name isn’t sold) and Limited, and the ‘trail-rated’ Trailhawk.
Corporate Affairs Director Karla Leach told motoring.com.au that Fiat Chrysler Group Australia is “aiming to start at $30,000” with the entry-level four-cylinder 2WD Sport variant (the outgoing Sport 2WD 3.7 auto opens the current Cherokee range at $28,000).
However, while all three engine options will be offered with the nine-speed auto in Australia, where the Longitude is expect to be the most popular variant, the diesel Cherokee will not be available from launch and the hard-core Trailhawk will only be available with a petrol V6.
 
I'm with you. Never before has something so ugly grown on me so quickly. I really thought it was a disaster. It might just turn out to be Jeep's salvation.
 
I'm with you. Never before has something so ugly grown on me so quickly. I really thought it was a disaster. It might just turn out to be Jeep's salvation.

And design aside (also growing on mw btw) Drive train sounds promising: 9 speed Auto, 3.2 Pentastar V6, Off-road pack with low range, locking central and rear diff also "terrain select"
Only downside is rear space, more Evoque than Jeep. Toys include, 8.2" Display and moon-roof etc.etc.

All-in-all then a usable/capable off-road 'toy' weekends and good daily commute. Will do fine in SA and I think you wiil second that? (pricing will pay a crucial roll for the Grand is expensive IMO) then there is the usual 60months/40% residual:rolleyes::D
 
^

It looks better after impact! Good Lord is it ugly!!!!!!!!!!! Martin and Human must have found some Columbian weed that made its way to SA.
 
jeep-cherokee-2014-001.webp


Review by Autocar:
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/jeep/cherokee/first-drives/2014-jeep-cherokee-first-drive-review

By Autoexpress:
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/jeep/cherokee/86570/new-jeep-cherokee-diesel-review

And Top Gear:
http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/jeep-cherokee-first-drive-2014-04-10


I agree with the comments about not looking that bad in real life. No, it's not a beauty, but not ugly either. The Juke is way more offensive to the eyes :D
 
I must say, I see a lot of them on the road these days here in Miami, and at least from the front, I think it looks great. The rear is a little plain, but I like the look.
 

Trending content


Back
Top