- Messages
- 10,047
That looks bloody gorgeous.
That looks bloody gorgeous.
^really though ? put yourself in that position mentally..
You have around 100K to spend on a sports car.
Would you really pick this over the 911,SL,M6..etc?
I know i wouldn't and that's often the problem with many good looking cars, that just bring looks to the table.
I would want one, but i don't want to pay for it.
Jags, Astons, Maseratis, Alfas etc all fall in that category.
If reason didn't win over feelings, I would be an Alfisti now![]()
^really though ? put yourself in that position mentally..
You have around 100K to spend on a sports car.
Would you really pick this over the 911,SL,M6..etc?
I second that. Sadly, a certain member will soon prove that many things are "wrong" under the sheet-metal, but let's be honest here, who would be willing to buy a new car with not the latest tech, chassis- and engine-wise, when it looks that good?
^^Not sure what is exactly different apart from dimensions but they do talk about new aluminum technology for parts of it's construction. In any case when you change a car's wheelbase and overall dimensions by the extent Jaguar has done between the XK and F-type it comes a completely different animal to drive.
Merc1 would disagree with that.
Why would I disagree with that? You're the one trying to say they're the same car based on a silly look-a-like picture.
M
I thought you had X-Ray eyes, and you could see that the new IS if just a huge facelift by looking at the body and that you could see the old E Class chassis in the new Quattroporte. You are not as objective as I thought.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.