bmer
Tire Trailblazer
- Messages
- 6,956
As Gizmodo wrote about this phone: "The phone was, unfortunately, irrelevant before it launched. Like a top-of-the-line horse-drawn carriage released shortly after Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon."
Yeah, Gizmodo really made clowns out of themselves with that N8-episode (not that they had much credibility in the first place, after all, they've been banned from many events and still boast how they revealed the iPhone 4 even though Engadget were also offered the prototype but they declined to pay). First they launched a ridiculous video trying to demonstrate that it takes ages to do simple tasks with the N8 and had the phone in the hand of some guy who seemed to use a Nokia phone for the first time in his life.
Then they write that they aren't going to do a review after all because the phone's OS in their opinion isn't enough up-to-date. That's like saying "We won't review it because we don't like it". I've never heard an excuse like this before. I'm not sure if they even realize how ridicolously naive their reasoning is.
Anyway...
I've tried the N8 several times as three of my friends have the phone. If you've used any of Nokia's other touchscreen phones, the UI is very familiar. IMO it's an impressive and competitive phone in its segment and definitely the best camera/media phone on the market.
What many journalists don't seem to understand is that the N8 is not meant to compete with the iPhone 4 (that task is reserved for the upcoming MeeGo devices) even if some of its features are comparable. Its target are Android phones in the mid to high-end segment or just below the flagship models.
Also some judge it only based on looking at the specs. Yes, it has "only" a 680 Mhz CPU but it also has an independent GPU (Broadcom BCM2727) which makes it comparable in performance to phones with 1 Ghz CPUs.
Symbian OS is also less resource-hogging and more power-efficient (consumes less battery) than Android.
Nokia developed the Symbian^3 OS for 2 years so the core is very much up to date. It's only the UI which feels somewhat dated but the original plan was to introduce the extensive UI updates with Symbian^4 (after they had done the big tweaks with the OS itself in Symbian^3). Now that they've decided to change to a model of continuous improvement and concurrently stopped calling them Symbian^3/Symbian^4, they can introduce new features as they get ready in smaller and more frequent updates rather than in big steps.
For Nokia the large existing Symbian phone base is both a blessing and a curse. The good thing is that they already have a lot of users and a vast selection of Symbian apps. The bad thing is that Nokia can't develop new Symbian versions from scratch or make revolutionary changes to the UI (like Microsoft did with the WinMo6.5 vs. WinPhone7) since it has to support the existing apps and feel familiar to Symbian users.
Writing apps for Symbian has been very complicated and inefficient so it was a big and important decision that Nokia decided to use Qt as the sole developer framework for both Symbian and MeeGo. This guarantees that the applications will work on both OS's. Qt also significantly reduces the amount of coding required to develop an app for Symbian.
There's a great article about Symbian's future on AllAboutSymbian: The future of the Symbian platform

