bum-man
Driving Dynamics Pro
- Messages
- 3,567
The side glasshouse (the side windows) are absolutely enormous and I'd love to see the finite element analysis simulation details and the torsional rigidity figures of the monocoque of the CLK.
The monocoque was definitely designed with the cabriolet version in mind on the outset. But the lack of the B-pillars and the thin arch roof railings (much like a steel arch bridge) must mean the lower half of the monocoque is very heavily strengthened in order to produce high levels of rigidity that Mercedes chassis and safety engineers demand.
The body-in-white monocoques must be very expensive. The monocoque would be made up of a large number of tailored steel blanks and high strength steel members. I'd love to place the CLK monocoque next to a BMW 3 Coupe monocoque and compare. Hope the CLK does not weigh too heavy
One thing I found troubling in some Mercedes is the height of the door sill. They are needed to provide strength and rigidity. They are quite high and does make entry into and exit out of the cabin an undignified affair.
Well, if memory serves me correctly the W208 had a 30% increase of torsional rigidity over it's predecessor, and it's predecessor had a B-pillar to boot. Now if newer Mercedes are anything to go by we should expect around a 10-15% increase of rigidity. I would say the bench marks are the new A5 and 3-series coupe, so expect the new CLK to hit their mark (in rigidity) or best it if they are really serious.
Am I seeing a Hof kink? Oh dear God!
We shall never hear the end of it.


