Then explain to me why they're going to introduce the '63 engine in the E and CLS classes which: a) are no lightweights in their own rights
b) will suffer from exactly the same performance deficits you describe above
Irrespective of ultimate vehicle mass, the cars performance is directly attributable to the KW/ton and Nm/ton ratios. So by the same notion that you put forward above, a CLS will also have a lower torque to weight ratio in
exactly the same manner that an SL will.
These statements by Merc's "boss", I've read them but remain unconvinced that they're in any way official.
You're welcome to rub my nose in it when you're proven right of course!