F1 Mosley: Turbos to return to F1 in 2011


Bartek S.

Aerodynamic Ace
Messages
8,302
4fd4d88f9c5694eb71d5e88001e8edf4.webp
Turbocharged engine regulations will return to formula one probably in 2011, FIA president Max Mosley said this week. Whilst declaring peace with the carmaker union GPDA’s Burkhard Goeschel in Munich, Mosley suggested that the end of normally-aspirated engines in Grand Prix racing will coincide with a more environmentally friendly sport of the future.

“The capacity would be up for discussion because we don’t want to have a ridiculous level of horsepower,” he said, adding that the engines would rev to a minimum of 15,000rpm and use ‘bio fuel’.
Mosley also said the final ‘fuel burning’ stage of the current qualifying system is bad for F1’s image and a tweak is possible for 2007. He said that “f we want to change that for 2007 we need unanimity. One of the suggestions is that we take five minutes off and allow an extra set of tyres. Then you are going to see non-stop action.”
In a Q&A published on the FIA’s website on Thursday, Mosley also said he would probably retire before 2010.
In the current trackside discussions about possible new rules for the future, some teams are pushing for a radical change on the engine front. According to the largest Austrian daily, Kronen Zeitung, Renault and also BMW are fully behind the push for small turbo-charged engines for the 2012 season and beyond.
The newspaper said those teams have proposed a 1.5L capacity for the turbos, with 1.5 bar boost.
Ferrari’s current reliability problems aside, it is no surprise the Italian marque’s rivals are pushing for the end to the current 2.4L normally-aspirated V8 era.
One key speed trap at the Valencia circuit last weekend captured Sebastien Bourdais (313kmh), Kimi Raikkonen (313), Sebastian Vettel (313), Felipe Massa (312) and Adrian Sutil (311) monopolising the top five positions in terms of sheer top-end grunt. All of the aforementioned drivers use Ferrari engines.
motorauthority
 
Yes, and then add maximum 200bhp, no aerodynamics and you get the most boring motorsport....
 
While he's at it, please remove France and Valencia from the calendar. Preserve Silverstone!
 
Remove France and Valencia and add Las Vegas:eusa_pray

How about a lego style engine. At Monaco take off a few blocks and run a six cylinder engine, Monza snap on a few more blocks and run a V12, other tracks v8 or v10. :t-crazy2:
 
While he's at it, please remove France and Valencia from the calendar. Preserve Silverstone!



Also remove the Hungaroring (boring), Barcelona (boring), Magny-Cours (boring; almost gone; Paul Ricard/Dijon/Reims all where much better tracks), Melbourne (Adelaide was better; and it's more about crashes/accidents/incidents then racing).

Monaco (boring) better get a good sprinkler system or is should be eliminated.

Silverstone, Monza, Spa should be wider and/or stripped out of some of those damned chicanes.
 
Although proposed (& upcoming) night races sound exciting. :eusa_danc

On paper it sounds exciting but don't have too high hopes. All sorts of promising crap were said about Valencia but it turned out to be one of the dullest races I've ever seen. Singapore can turn out to be just another boring street race except that it takes place during the night.
 
On paper it sounds exciting but don't have too high hopes. All sorts of promising crap were said about Valencia but it turned out to be one of the dullest races I've ever seen. Singapore can turn out to be just another boring street race except that it takes place during the night.



i have a strong feeling Singapore is gonna be boring like hell. the circuit lacks a natural flow, like Turkey or Interlagos.

plus, under the lights, it's 4 times brighter than a football stadium. i'd bring my shades if i were going there.
 
Just a off topic question
Why does F1 cars have a clutch?
When the gearbox is automatic ( or sequentiall or whatever you call it)

PS
I know that automatics also have a clutch..
But why do F1 cars have operatable cluthes?
For example there are clutch flaps behind the steering wheels on a F1 car..
 
Just a off topic question
Why does F1 cars have a clutch?
When the gearbox is automatic ( or sequentiall or whatever you call it)

PS
I know that automatics also have a clutch..
But why do F1 cars have operatable cluthes?
For example there are clutch flaps behind the steering wheels on a F1 car..

SMG is an "automatic" but it has a clutch as well. I don't know 100% about formula 1, but when I had the chance to work with a 997 911 GT3 Cup, you engage the clutch for first gear then just you shift using the knob only after that.

Automatic = torque converter
Manual = clutch... even though some you don't need to actually engage it yourself... need better explanation
 
Just a off topic question
Why does F1 cars have a clutch?
When the gearbox is automatic ( or sequentiall or whatever you call it)

PS
I know that automatics also have a clutch..
But why do F1 cars have operatable cluthes?
For example there are clutch flaps behind the steering wheels on a F1 car..

On which car have you seen clutch flaps. The Mclaren steering wheel does have four flaps on the back although two of them are for their "manual traction control" as the media refers to it.
 
^nope they arent..
Listen to lewis..
Its clutch flaps..

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
F1 cars have electronic clutch used for first gear.
The paddles control the clutch allowing slipppage as a form a traction control. IIRC
 

Trending content


Back
Top