S-Class (W223) Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W223) Facelift 2024


The Mercedes-Benz W223 is the seventh generation of the S‑Class full-size luxury sedan, produced by Mercedes-Benz since 2020. It replaces the W222 S‑Class which had been produced since 2013. Production: 2020- Model years: 2021-
This is an interesting comparison with the Maybach S480, GLS450 and Range Rover vs a number of top end Chinese cars, including the Maextro S800. The MOPF S-class and W224 will have to be special indeed to distance themselves from these cars.:popcorn:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You can’t replace a V12 with a V8 hybrid, it’s like apples and oranges.

The V12 drives completely different.
You can't replace a V8 with a turbo 4 cylinder, but they did.

The V12 S65 was discontinued, so the S63e is basically what ended up replacing it. An insanely overpowered cruise missile. With a non-e-performance S63 on the horizon, the S63e will occupy the same place in the heirarchy as the old S65. Unless they make a new V12 AMG, but that remains to be seen.
 
Over here a non hybrid S63 will be vastly more expensive. Not to mention the actual replacement to the S65 will have a V12.

I struggle to find a reason for the e-Performance to exist when there's a choice for a regular S63 as well. I doubt it'll sell if they offer both, particularly when the non hybrid will actually be cheaper (as it should be) virtually everywhere. I mean it's not like people in this segment will be worried about fuel prices.

Now if only they also offered the choice between the grille of the S63 and the regular regal S class grille........
Remember the days where you could get an OEM 'undercover' E63 AMG? Good stuff.

E63 AMG Business Line '14:

1767903941793.webp



The ultimate sleeper. Downgraded exterior looks and even lacking the quad exhaust. Genius, wish they kept this going (it sold extremely poorly sadly).
I have a new found love for the W212 btw. When it was on the market 10 years ago I didn't like the boxy look, but it was ahead of its time and I pray the new design direction for MB goes back to more angularity. I am sick and tired of all the aerodynamic pebbles we have now.

In black it’s even more understated.
 
You can't replace a V8 with a turbo 4 cylinder, but they did.

The V12 S65 was discontinued, so the S63e is basically what ended up replacing it. An insanely overpowered cruise missile. With a non-e-performance S63 on the horizon, the S63e will occupy the same place in the heirarchy as the old S65. Unless they make a new V12 AMG, but that remains to be seen.
Both decisions were stupid.

I agree.(y)

Regarding new V12, everything is possible.
 
It's not the hybrid that causes the S63 problems , it's the absolutely insane price.

It's over 50k more than the previous model. And that is stupid.

The weight according to some reviews has resulted in a firmer ride than S63 buyers are typically used to. I can't comment on this as I have not driven any S63 variant, but members like @sako97, @Swissbob and @Mick Briesgau would probably have a better idea.

Without the weight penalty they should be able to deliver a better handling and riding car. The lower price point would be a bonus, but that could easily be eaten up by the FL upgrades (interior etc) and specification changes.
 
I can comment on the predecessor(I drove a 500 and I own a 63), which was in AMG trim way firmer than the non AMG S-Class.

The AMG Comfort mode is at least 30% firmer than the non AMG in Sport.

It’s still not harsh but it feels very tight, because of the stiffer bushes of the suspension.

My dealer told me that the 223 63 AMG is even stiffer than the predecessor because of the heavy battery in the back. And because of the stiffer bushes road noise becomes an issue.

I hope that the new 63 gets a softer rear axle, because this is the problem of the current one.
 
It's not the hybrid that causes the S63 problems , it's the absolutely insane price.

It's over 50k more than the previous model. And that is stupid.

It’s very expensive, the S680 Maybach costs 8% more in Switzerland.

But that’s a V12 with far more options.

The 580 is currently the best S-Class on the market.

The performance numbers are comparable to a G63 which isn’t slow either.
 
The weight according to some reviews has resulted in a firmer ride than S63 buyers are typically used to. I can't comment on this as I have not driven any S63 variant, but members like @sako97, @Swissbob and @Mick Briesgau would probably have a better idea.

Without the weight penalty they should be able to deliver a better handling and riding car. The lower price point would be a bonus, but that could easily be eaten up by the FL upgrades (interior etc) and specification changes.
I’ve got no experience with the new or old S63. The S65 V12 W222 I’ve driven a few months ago, didn’t feel firm at all. I’d say the drive was comparable to my own W222s.
 
I was told the S65 has a smother suspension, I guess it has MBC.

Yup, it was MBC all day long. The W222 S63 with “sport tuned” airmatic + 7G MCT has a much different personality. One is a 0-100 mph rockstar, while the S65 is a 65-130 mph cruise missile.

The specifics on the softer suspension tuning is one of the details you find when closely reading the 65’s press releases since the W221. The ABC was tuned differently than the 63’s. Kind of like the “F1” SL55 ABC suspension option that I didn’t know about for years after owning one.

I saw a recent clip of the 1mi race between the CLE53 vs S65 and at least one person in the comments section got the memo correctly and said it was the wrong type of race, and should've been rolling race from 60mph. The 65 was one of those “if you know, you know” type of cars.

MB tried to merge the S63 and S65 into the S63E - in the late 2010’s Jesmb and other sources said it’d be a revival of the S73, but now we see it’s more a souped up S63 than anything - impressive but challenged.

@Swissbob - yes the heavy battery puts a big strain on the rear axle. Many rear-end impacts will crack the subframe and immediately write-off the car. I’m not sure what happened to the S63 in this video, but I’ve never seen this case before:


It’s a great car, but a scary proposition to own out of warranty for 5+ years between the battery and extra weight overworking the brakes and tires, versus a non AMG. The second-hand market will reflect this. A simple S63 with no batteries will be a big hit with traditionalists.
 
@sako97
Excellent post (y)

I choose the 63 over the 65 deliberately because of 4matic. It’s after all the sharpest S-Class.

The cracked subframe is crazy :eek: especially as it’s obviously a write off.

For second hand buyers, it’ll be a PITA especially as it’s difficult to detect, and If the dealership has no idea about that, it might break on the road with scary consequences.

I agree, the used price of this thing will eventually crater like a EQS53.

This is BTW the HV battery.


32k CAD , not exactly cheap.
 

Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes-Benz Group AG is headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany. Established in 1926, Mercedes-Benz Group produces consumer luxury vehicles and light commercial vehicles badged as Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-AMG, and Mercedes-Maybach. Its origin lies in Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft's 1901 Mercedes and Carl Benz's 1886 Benz Patent-Motorwagen, which is widely regarded as the first internal combustion engine in a self-propelled automobile. The slogan for the brand is "the best or nothing".
Official website: Mercedes-Benz (Global), Mercedes-Benz (USA)

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top