It will be slower than the F90 M5 CS even when the battery is fully charged. The G90 M5 achieved 11.17sec at 199km/h (124mph) in the 1/4 mile in the above video. The M5 CS is a 10.2sec car to 200km/h (124mph), so its faster and this was with 2 testers in the car.Cars are so uninteresting these days that I couldn't be bothered to google whether the G90 M5 is a plug-in hybrid or not. So if the G90 M5 is a plug-in hybrid, how does it perform when the battery pack is flat and will still be quicker than an F90 M5 CS?
It will be slower than the F90 M5 CS even when the battery is fully charged. The G90 M5 achieved 11.17sec at 199km/h (124mph) in the 1/4 mile in the above video. The M5 CS is a 10.2sec car to 200km/h (124mph), so its faster and this was with 2 testers in the car.
If you look at the acceleration numbers on the regular F90 M5 with 600PS it was just as fast or even faster than the latest G90, so in my opinion it has gone backwards, 727PS vs 600PS for the same performance. If I was in the market for this kind of car I would rather go for the new M3 Comp than buy the new M5.The F90 M5 CS is a special version lighter weight M5. The G90 is just marketed as an everyday M5. That considered those numbers are still impressive considering the weight. If BMW decided to introduce a CS version of the G90 M5 it would probably have close to 800ps, slightly lighter weight and most likely beat the F90 M5 CS in the numbers department.
The best 0-60mph time he could get was 3.41sec, which is about 0.3sec slower than the previous M5, M3 Comp and Merc E63S. 0-100mph in 7.31sec is also about 0.2 to 0.3sec slower and 1/4mile in 11.37sec is about 0.1 to 0.2sec slower. The massive 2419kg mass without driver is to blame but then the car also was a good example with 774PS power (compared to 727PS claimed).
The best 0-60mph time he could get was 3.41sec, which is about 0.3sec slower than the previous M5, M3 Comp and Merc E63S. 0-100mph in 7.31sec is also about 0.2 to 0.3sec slower and 1/4mile in 11.37sec is about 0.1 to 0.2sec slower. The massive 2419kg mass without driver is to blame but then the car also was a good example with 774PS power (compared to 727PS claimed).
The best 0-60mph time he could get was 3.41sec, which is about 0.3sec slower than the previous M5, M3 Comp and Merc E63S. 0-100mph in 7.31sec is also about 0.2 to 0.3sec slower and 1/4mile in 11.37sec is about 0.1 to 0.2sec slower. The massive 2419kg mass without driver is to blame but then the car also was a good example with 774PS power (compared to 727PS claimed).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.