- Messages
- 3,574
If I am not mistaken, with about 85 litres in different fluids, the dry weight is about (1355 minus ~70) 1280 kg. Not bad, given the 1169 hp on tap, but also significantly over their intended dry weight. The only seemingly 'low' figure is 781 for total torque, which is sufficient, given the weight and the way the engine was designed to spin very fast from the get-go to help with agility and acceleration around corners as opposed to the pull on the straight line. This thing should drive blisteringly fast around any track.So now the user manual is circulating in the net. And thats good since AM wont give us the spec of the car.
First; «unladen mass» weight is stated as 1355 kg. I understand this is the same as kerb weight
The more I hear about the customer cars the more compromised it seems, just like AMG One. Claimed stats are interesting. No more 250 mph (402 km/h top speed... More weight than anticipated.
Still, 1000hp on tap and a screaming redline. It still looks like an alien space ship.
5 l smaller than the already tiny AMG One tank, without electric-only range and with significantly worse fuel consumption.50 liter fuel tank…?!?! Will this be enough for a lap around Nürnburgring…?
The front tyres may ‘skip’ at low speeds with summer tyres installed when a high level of steering lock is applied. This is a characteristic of the vehicle and does not affect the safety or performance of the vehicle.
Dead (as in need to be replaced) HV batteries is a common issue with the old-generation hybrid supercars (LaFerrari, 918, P1) if they aren't regularly driven or kept plugged in. But at least those can be plugged in to prevent issues.The HV battery is charged using the E-Motor by using excess engine power. There is no direct external charge point for the HV battery. If the HV battery is drained down to 0% the vehicle must be recovered to an Aston Martin Dealer
Unladen mass is (in the UK at least) with fluids, but without fuel or driver. So kerb weight would be 1392.5kg. So basically 1400kg as I've been saying for years (although, to be fair, that wasn't even my guess, just a guy familiar with the project leaking that).So now the user manual is circulating in the net. And thats good since AM wont give us the spec of the car.
First; «unladen mass» weight is stated as 1355 kg. I understand this is the same as kerb weight
What blows my mind is how Gordon Murrays shaves so much weight from his halo cars without sacrificing creature comforts. True engineering intelligence is irreplaceable.Unladen mass is (in the UK at least) with fluids, but without fuel or driver. So kerb weight would be 1392.5kg. So basically 1400kg as I've been saying for years (although, to be fair, that wasn't even my guess, just a guy familiar with the project leaking that).
What blows my mind is how Gordon Murrays shaves so much weight from his halo cars without sacrificing creature comforts. True engineering intelligence is irreplaceable.
It's almost as if there's a drive to try and reduce the range of ICE vehicles to that of EVs.5 l smaller than the already tiny AMG One tank, without electric-only range and with significantly worse fuel consumption.
Fair enough. AM's official numbers are a bit disappointing for now––if not surprising to me too much, knowing how the project was hijacked from Newey. I remain optimistic about the lap times; if the One did what it did, this thing should be 3-5 seconds faster around the same track.To be honest mate I'm just going to wait for a final specifications customer ordered and delivered one that's going to be independently weighed by an authoritative outlet say Autocar or Evo Magazine.
The amount of, well to be civil "claims" I've heard whether someone saying 0-400km/h in "20" seconds or under and someone else "beating" it with a patently ludicrous "15.5" seconds just completely puts me off, absolutely, whether or not I Love those particular products and or manufacturers and or brands.
Everyone remembers the fiasco around the kerb weight one of the Holy Trinity members had. The remnants of those comments are spread through disparate communities everywhere.
My motto, where possible is, that's nice, now SHOW me! But alas sometimes even I succumb to it! A recent bloody Bugatti video LOL!![]()
Fair enough. AM's official numbers are a bit disappointing for now––if not surprising to me too much, knowing how the project was hijacked from Newey. I remain optimistic about the lap times; if the One did what it did, this thing should be 3-5 seconds faster around the same track.
It's almost as if there's a drive to try and reduce the range of ICE vehicles to that of EVs.
Yeah what an absolute damn shame. I heard so many uncorroborated stories over the years it was difficult to separate fact from fiction. So I to a degree stopped caring much.
To be honest Newey seems to have been well and truly stuffed, the design team at Gaydon had Myles plus I forget his name that tall guy. It seemed to many people were layered into the project.
Adrian has another go with the Red Bull Racing hybrid to come so we will see.
I'm tracking or watching the Aston Martin Valhalla and Lotus Evija and Gordon Murray Automotive T50 more now. Something a little closer to home, let's say a slight change from Bu, well you get it. But there's never enough time!![]()
not to mention rumour of Lawrence Stroll deciding to take some cost cutting shortcuts for a project that requires a lot of money to meet its targets
but then again, this wouldn't be the first time (or the last) corporate management screws over a technical project
So reviews are coming out in a couple of weeks?A cameo by chassis 70/150.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.