• As a reminder, this section is for civil discussions only. In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

A320 crashes at Sao Paulo's main airport


In the first video, the news anchors says to pay attention carefully to the left corner of the video. That's the moment where the plane crahses into the building and it explodes, followed by a second explosion.

In the second video, it shows a similar A320 landing on the same wet track - the first A320 takes 11 seconds to cruise the track. And then the the A320 that crashed - 3 seconds to cruise the track.
 
No I did read his comment correctly.

In the original post on this thread posted by Rob, the news report suggests, but does not confirm that there were ANY fatalities. So how could our friend know that in fact everyone had died. Klier posted about an hour after he did with the news that everyone had in fact been killed. So, using the knowledge that CB was in an airport, let's just assume that he was on his plane flying high in the sky when it was reported that everyone had in fact been killed. You can't just take his comment out of context, you have to give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
This is a sad and unfortunate accident.

Experienced airport personel always point out that any accident happens for at least three different-seperate reasons.

In this case probably: Pilot's error , Airfield layout (short runway) and bad weather conditions.
 
Sh!t happens every day all over the world. Sadly.

But what can we do? Cry all day & be depressed?

So, man is going to vacations - going to enjoying. Should he canceled the vacations & go mourn the people he didn't even know?

Yes, death is a sad thing. For some more, for some less. For some it is even a relieve, or a noble sacrifice.

But humans are "designed" to be shocked by death only in case when our lives are in danger, or when lives of people we know are in danger. It's a protective mechanism.

:t-hands:

OK. I'm not going there again. We had similar problem with Anna Nicole Smith's death.


First and foremost I think you are approaching this in the wrong in the way, especially after the discussions you and I had both publicly and private about the matter. I would assume that you will not apologize since you quite frankly don't care about the fact that we had finished discussing our opinions on the ANS matter. Although I don't really wish to entertain your post since you are one of the few members I don't associate myself with anymore, I will just respond to respond.

I am not here complaining about the death of these people. Yes people die, and you seem to not worry about it and I guess that is fine. I amd sure that if someone close to you dies one day you don't start crying and/or get depressed but rather sit there and think to yourself that life happens to everyone and just move on reading on the next BMW.

Also, Eni I suggest you read that post again, what I had to say, and what other people said so that you can better educate yourself on the situation. I am not hear arguing--and if you think I am please feel compelled to show me where I indicate this--that he should be crying or even cancelling his flight. It is not about that, and it is sad that you just want to make an attack on me by using those ideas. I kow you are quite smart and know that this is not the issue here.

Oh, and if you want to talk about life, death, after life, or anything related to the subject matter please feel free to go to TheByte, a newly formed forum that is affiliated with germancarforum.com, where you can feel free to discuss things such as that. See you there mate! :D
Please, stop trying to be an Angel here. He didn't know anybody died. He probably just read this fist post of this thread, without knowing anything else.



You're too easy offended. Stop going to public internet forums is my advise.

I am offended you THANK Rob for this thread...you're the only one in fact. Are you happy with this news???

See??? Now I made you look bad.

Made me look bad? Not really. I don't really make myself look bad. You, on the other hand, are one of the most biased and ignorant people on this forum and you constanyl make youself look bad. One easy search on your posts and you will see thay you contribute nothing but problems, ignorance, and irrationality.

Stop going to public internet forums? I have. I actually am coming less and less because of people like you that like to act all smart and stir things up by responding to a perfectly well orgnaized and logical post based on what the subject matter. Unfortunately, you may not see this.

Notic, you take his comment out of context even more with quoting only that part.

Way to go hitting that guy :eusa_clap

I am cool Tyc....sure hope Micheal isn't going to bad rep me again though. Or worse ban me.

Do I hope you get banned? Yes. Do I hope you get bad rep? Yes. Will I do any of those two? No.

I don't waste my time doing immature things like that, and since you mentioned it maybe that is what you waste your time doing. A system such as karma or thanks is there to stimulate the forums so that good and informationl content can be applauded. All because I dont agree with your post doesn't mean I am going to go ban or give you bad rep. One more thing, I have never given you bad rep whatsoever in the history of this forum. However, if you feel compelled to follow up on whether that is true please feel free to PM admin to see if they can investigate that.



No I did read his comment correctly.

In the original post on this thread posted by Rob, the news report suggests, but does not confirm that there were ANY fatalities. So how could our friend know that in fact everyone had died. Klier posted about an hour after he did with the news that everyone had in fact been killed. So, using the knowledge that CB was in an airport, let's just assume that he was on his plane flying high in the sky when it was reported that everyone had in fact been killed. You can't just take his comment out of context, you have to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Based on what you have said, you are correct. However, that was not my entire point. The man may not have known, and that is granted by the evidence that we have, nevertheless why does he come to a thread such as this one talking about his trip, the photos that he will post and better yet, saying that he hopes he doesn't have that luck as well? What is that? Do you think that was logical, correct, or even proper for a thread such as this one, whether he knew or not that people had died or he even cared for them? I don't think so.
 
Guys, there's no need for this really! I suggest you all calm down and if needed, please continue this in the right forum (Eni & Michael) or through pm for the good of the forum.

Plus, imo, it's best to close this thread 'cause it leads nowhere...

:t-cheers:
 
Klier you should be grateful that Michael is a nice guy. According to forum rules you should had been permanently banned by now for attacking a moderator (no matter if he was right or wrong in the first place).

So you should be grateful that he is not pushing the button cause frankly if he did noone would blame him.

Back to the topic now.
 
Michael, I really don't know what your problem is. :t-hands:

I guess you are having some problems dealing with situations when death is involved. And than attacking other people who talk more comfortably or even with humor about such situations.

Yes, the situation in Sao Paolo is indeed sad but people die every day. In even more painful situations that are not even covered by media because they are not spectacular enough to be covered in "Breaking News" form.

So, I guess you have some sort of fetish for spectacular death situations. :t-hands: Eg. "poor" Anna Nicole Smith OD, or people who died in spectacular accidents & attacks.

What about poor kids in Africa who die of hunger. Or people who are victims of genocide (eg. in Darfur).

Not spectacular enough for you?

8fa9598ee8cbab17a00599da79035082.webp



Not spectacular enough?
 
Wow. I really can't believe you just posted and said what you just said. You know that wasn't my point and you continue to attack me? Alright.

Michael, I really don't know what your problem is. :t-hands:

I guess you are having some problems dealing with situations when death is involved. And than attacking other people who talk more comfortably or even with humor about such situations.

Yes, the situation in Sao Paolo is indeed sad but people die every day. In even more painful situations that are not even covered by media because they are not spectacular enough to be covered in "Breaking News" form.

So, I guess you have some sort of fetish for spectacular death situations. :t-hands: Eg. "poor" Anna Nicole Smith OD, or people who died in spectacular accidents & attacks.

What about poor kids in Africa who die of hunger. Or people who are victims of genocide (eg. in Darfur).

Not spectacular enough for you?

Not spectacular enough?
 

Trending content


Back
Top