D
Deleted member 25
Guest
Very conservative base, visuallu well proportionned car, i like it.
Guess they don't want to give it all away before the start of the race season, just like how Mclaren didn't equip their cars with the F-duct at the launch.From the cockpit forward the car resembles the F60. The biggest change I see is the side of the side pod intakes as well as the fin that's not attached to the rear wing any longer. The most radical changes are likely beneath the surface where Ferrari are said to have an innovative suspension system.
What caught my eye was the blatantly obvious Marlboro advertising. Subliminal advertising doesn't get more obvious than that. To my surprise they are lost Etihad and Mubadala as sponsors and opted for TATA. Worth mentioning is that the Fiat Group purchased back the 5% of the company they sold to Mubadala a few years ago.
Braaf, in brief, whilst the essential operating principle is very similar between something like a road-going Scuderia's F1 gearbox and a pukka F1 race 'box, there are still some very distinct differences. Whilst selector forks are still used to engage gears to output shaft, the shift actuation mechanisms, gear set arrangement and overall packaging is quite different between the two.Martin, maybe you can kill my curiosity. If I'm not mistaken these cars use seamless shift gearboxes. Is it any different from a lets a Ferrari Sequential box cos apparently only one clutch allowed in F1 cars. Thanks in advance.
Guess they don't want to give it all away before the start of the race season, just like how Mclaren didn't equip their cars with the F-duct at the launch.
I suppose with the new active rear wing, there is no need for the fin to be attached to the rear wing.
The new Merc...
![]()
That front end is a shameless copy of last year's Red Bull.
Braaf, in brief, whilst the essential operating principle is very similar between something like a road-going Scuderia's F1 gearbox and a pukka F1 race 'box, there are still some very distinct differences. Whilst selector forks are still used to engage gears to output shaft, the shift actuation mechanisms, gear set arrangement and overall packaging is quite different between the two.
The actuation of the selector forks is a significant difference - the Formula One gearbox uses a keyed, rotating barrel to move the selector forks, whilst the robotised manual gearbox follows a more conventional approach - selector forks moved by shift rods operated by hydraulics.
Of course an F1 gearbox is much smaller and lighter and is only required to last 7 races as opposed to hundreds of thousands of kms.
The actual shift speeds in an F1 gearbox is also much quicker, 'box manufacturers like X-trac are able to pre-engage the next gear simultaneously with the decoupling of the current gear. The whole process operates on a knife-edge.

Ok... so we have 2 teams using the Lotus name on the grid?
The color scheme on the Renault looks very retro, and it can do without the red. After looking at some higher res photos, it seems the Renault team has copied Red Bull and gone for the pull rod rear suspension, resulting in a very low, compact rear bodywork.
Definitely not. The ISR (Independent Shifting Rod) transmission is the next evolution of the robotised manual box we've seen in SMG et al and follows much the same technical principles of selector fork actuation. Nothing like the X-trac gearboxes in Formula 1.Thanks Martin, my curiosity is now killed. Just one qusetion. Is this the same type of tech that will be used in the new Lambo.![]()
Definitely not. The ISR (Independent Shifting Rod) transmission is the next evolution of the robotised manual box we've seen in SMG et al and follows much the same technical principles of selector fork actuation. Nothing like the X-trac gearboxes in Formula 1.

Whoa that gold black Lotus/renault is HOT
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.