M5 BMW M5 F10 - Test Drives/Reviews


The BMW M5 is a high-performance variant of the BMW 5 Series marketed under the BMW M sub-brand. It is considered an iconic vehicle in the sports saloon category. The first M5 model was hand-built beginning in late 1984 on the E28 535i chassis with a modified engine from the M1 that made it the fastest production saloon at the time. M5 models have been produced for every generation of the 5 Series since 1984, with occasional gaps in production (1995 to 1998, 2023 to 2024). Official website: BMW M

Merc1

Premium
Slightly Less Exotic, yet Still a Better Sport Sedan


Back in 2006 when BMW revealed the last M5 super sedan, fast cars were still all about, well, going fast. BMW crowed about its screaming V10 and no one really cared if it guzzled super unleaded at a furious pace.

Now people care about fuel consumption and emissions, or at least they pretend to. Carmakers have to care, so the 2012 BMW M5 has to do more than just lay two black lines on the road whenever you stand on the right pedal. It has to be efficient while doing so and it can't emit even the faintest hint of black soot in the process.

Which is how we've arrived here, driving a brand-new twin-turbo V8-powered BMW M5. It's down on displacement, more efficient and cleaner-burning, yet somehow it's still a ridiculously fast sport sedan that gives up nothing to its V10 predecessor.

Deal With It
Whether you love forced induction or not, it's here to stay. Not just in economy cars, but supercars and hot rod sedans, too, and that philosophy shift has radically changed the character of the 2012 BMW M5.

The 4,395cc V8 slotted into the new M5's nose is related to the one in the X5 M and X6 M. It's not a direct swap, though — new heads have been fitted, revised twin-scroll turbochargers are nestled in the engine's vee, the intercoolers have been reworked and new pistons raise the compression ratio from 9.3:1 to 10.0:1. Boost pressure climbs to a maximum of 22 psi, partly as a result of a reshaped exhaust that poses less exhaust restriction.

BMW has also fitted its Valvetronic variable valve control. M cars have traditionally used multiple throttle bodies to deliver maximum power, but Valvetronic does away with the conventional throttle butterfly and uses variable intake valve lift to do the job instead. BMW claims the addition of Valvetronic actually improves throttle response, but its real goal is to deliver some more palatable fuel figures. And it appears as though it works, as the new M5's V8 is 30 percent more efficient than the old V10, according to BMW.

Nothing Wrong With a Pair of Turbos
Yeah sure, that's all very nice, but there's only one reason for buying a car like the 2012 BMW M5 and that's for driving absurdly fast. And 30 percent efficiency improvement or not, the M5 delivers.

Compared to the previous M5, power rises from an even 500 horses to 560 horsepower at 6,000 rpm. The maximum torque rating remains unchanged at 501 pound-feet, but its arrival starts at a mere 1,500 rpm compared to the V10's late 6,100 torque peak. BMW claims the extra power drops the M5's 0-62-mph time from 4.7 seconds to just 4.4 seconds.

But even that doesn't describe how much faster the new car feels on the road. That huge spread of torque means the effective rev range is much broader than the old car's. The V10's midrange pull was never as weak as detractors made out, but a big overtaking maneuver always meant dropping a couple of gears. Not any longer.

So, a win-win situation then? Almost. All that power means fewer trips to the redline because, well, you don't really need to bother. It's less work, but there's less reward. More importantly, the V8 doesn't sound anywhere near as special as the old V10.

SMG Gives Way to M DCT
We suspect few will mourn the loss of the old M5's clunky SMG transmission. In its place is BMW's new M DCT seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox. You still shift it with those same tactile rubber-backed steering wheel paddles — or by tipping the console stick back and forth if you prefer. But the M DCT is light-years ahead of the old SMG manual, which felt slow and clunky back in 2004, and was feeling positively prehistoric by the time production ended last year.

The new dual-clutch setup is smooth, quick, and makes the engine feel much more responsive than it does in the X5 M and X6 M, both of which make do with a traditional torque-converter-equipped automatic gearbox. But if you enjoyed the slightly scary sensation of the old M5 banging through the gears flat out, you might be surprised to find this one changes without much drama.

The biggest gains are probably in Auto mode, as the DCT does a much better job of slipping unobtrusively between ratios when you're not in the mood to thrash the daylights out of the V8. And instead of the old SMG's bewildering 11 different shift modes, the new one has just six: three for Auto mode and three for Manual.

Feels Like an M5
But just because this M car is easier to drive slowly doesn't mean it's not huge fun to drive fast. It might have had to bow down to the engine downsizing trend, but the M department hasn't rolled over completely.

The steering is still hydraulically assisted rather than electrically driven, as on the other 5 Series cars. And you won't find a set of run-flat tires under the arches, just proper high-performance rubber. There's even a set of six-pot fixed calipers behind the front wheels, replacing the old M5's sliding caliper brakes.

Compared to the old V10 M5 and the current standard 5 Series, this one has a grittier feel to its steering. It gives you a far clearer sense of what's going on down at the front wheels and feels much more precise just off center as you first tip the M5 into a bend. You need that precision, too, because at just 2.6 turns lock-to-lock, the new rack is quick (if not as swift as a normal 5 with active steering) and points the nose into corners with much more enthusiasm. And that's despite a 253-pound increase in curb weight to 4,123 pounds.

The M Factor
As before, there are numerous buttons clustered around the shifter, allowing you to tailor the driving experience to your own taste. But now the fat three-spoke wheel has not one, but a pair of M buttons to summon up either of your two favorite mixes of settings.

Sound like overkill? Not with three settings for throttle response, three ESP modes, six gearbox modes and three damper settings to choose from. The ride is surprisingly good whichever damper mode you choose. As expected, the middle-of-the-road Sport setting provides the best blend of ride and body control for fast road use. That leaves Comfort for broken roads and Sport Plus for tarmac that's smoother than a granite kitchen worktop.

Traction is impressive, too, in part thanks to a brand-new fully active M differential, which uses sensors around the car to decide how to apportion the torque across the rear axle for maximum bite. Or maximum slide. Come on, this is a BMW M5 after all. Switching the DSC to its intermediate setting allows a little slip, enough to let you feel the car moving around, but for the really flamboyant stuff you have to turn the whole lot off. And sure enough, you can.

A More Subtle M5
As ever, the 2012 BMW M5's greatest asset is that it hides all this lunacy and performance under the inauspicious clothes of a midsize sedan. Aesthetic changes over the standard F10 5 Series sedan include an M3-style front bumper with three gaping air intakes, chrome-rimmed gills set into the front fenders, a small trunk lid spoiler and, of course, those four trademark exhaust pipes.

The standard double-spoke wheels measure 19 inches in diameter, and a set of 20s is optional. Seems a bit much given that the standard rubber measures 265/40 in front and 295/35 in back. Either set of wheels looks sharp, though, so you can't really go wrong either way.

If some of the M5's wilder character traits have disappeared in the metamorphosis from E60 to F10, then so have the rough edges. The brakes feel stronger, the performance is more usable and, if the engine is slightly less exciting, the improved chassis and much longer touring range makes up for it. It's all about efficiency these days, remember?

It's a shame the V10 had to go. We're unlikely to see an engine like that again. But the new 2012 BMW M5 is more than just a great engine, it's a better overall sport sedan.


2012 BMW M5 First Drive


M
 
"The maximum torque rating remains unchanged at 501 pound-feet"

Hmm, so the V10 made the same torque while spinning far more RPM, but made less HP? Someone at insideline should probably doublecheck the E60 V10's spec sheet... Or perhaps read up on the diff between newtonmeter and foot pounds. ;)

And thank you BMW for lifting the press embargo, when I'm sick on my couch with just my laptop for entertainment. :usa7uh:

Edit:

From Automobile:

"The biggest disappointment with the M5 is turbo lag. Yeah, yeah, how typical that I'm complaining about a turbocharged M5. Actually, I'm not complaining about the fact that the M5 wears turbos: I'm complaining that the S63TU engine has so much more lag than the non-Valvetronic S63 did. In that silly X6M (and the slightly less silly X5M), the turbos were among the most responsive I've ever experienced. Not so in the M5 - the lag is significant enough that you have to drive around it.
And it seems that M's engineers aren't fully using their arsenal of tools (Valvetronic, Double VANOS, direct injection) to mitigate lag. Case in point, drive at highway speeds, and the transmission is in seventh gear. Floor the throttle and you get a fairly quick downshift into third: revs in the top half of the tach, all is well. The problem is that there's no boost, so you get a clutch engagement, followed by no power for a second, followed by massive thrust. Boost should have been built by the time the downshift was done. VW does it and has been doing so for years. What gives?
Oh, and remember: a full second of lag is one thing in a slow car, but think of the opportunity cost in a car like this! A second of lag is means you've missed out on probably some 15 extra mph. Seems like a small problem, but it got old very quickly when trying to pass slower traffic on country roads."

2012 BMW M5 First Drive - Automobile Magazine

This sounds quite odd?
 
The standard of automotive journalism is on the decline. Since when does the first drive of an M5 by Autocar not go to Steve Sutcliffe? The 501 foot-pound to NM torque confusion is laughable at first but then it just becomes sad. Does the journo actually not understand engines at all?

This from Autocar:
So it is fast – fast enough to be a real threat to your licence, so addictive is its performance and the deep thrum of its engine under full load. But what really distinguishes the new M5 from each and every M5 that has gone before it is the enormous flexibility of its power delivery. Bury the throttle at anything beyond 1500rpm – the point where peak torque is developed, and it surges forward with immense force, seemingly in any gear.

Its performance, molded in no uncertain terms by its new engine’s mountain of torque, is omnipresent. Overtaking is truly effortless, helped in no uncertain part by the effectiveness of the new seven-speed box. I’m not sure how BMW has done it, but the shifts are race car quick, accompanied on full throttle up-shifts by an alluring bark of exhaust and a hearty blip on downshifts.

It contradicts what Automobile's Jason Cammisa has to say about the lag. Kable finds overtaking to be "effortless", Cammisa reckons it's a chore? Hmmm. Waiting for the EVO and Sport Auto verdicts. Personally, I can't believe that the F10 M5 suffers from any significant amount of lag. Not with that turbo setup - no way. Maybe Cammisa put his car into limp mode. :D

Edit: Cammisa also mentions this in his write-up:
Strangely, the X6 M's torque-vectoring differential didn't make it into this application. I'll try to find out why.

Erm, Jason, such Torque Vectoring systems (like on fast Audis and other AWD BMWs) has been design specifically to mitigate the understeer inherent in an AWD vehicle. They enable the multiplication of torque to the given rear wheel with the most grip thus increasing yaw at the rear. Of course a powerful, rear wheel drive car with a limited slip differential - unfettered by a driven front axle - will do much the same and more.
 
"significant amount of lag"

That's BS indeed.;)

As with my X6 M the variable twin-turbo's, all the thrust is available at a moment's notice with little-to-no turbo lag if I have to be critical or exaggerating. Turbo lag I literally felt back in the day when I owned a E53 3.0d. Not even the X1 23d Twin Variable Turbo has lag worth mentioning at ANY throttle position.
 
Funny how some of the American car sites have reported the F10 M5 press drives (Road and Track notably absent at present) but there's nothing yet on EVO, Topgear, AutoExpress, CAR UK et al...
 
The standard of automotive journalism is on the decline. Since when does the first drive of an M5 by Autocar not go to Steve Sutcliffe? The 501 foot-pound to NM torque confusion is laughable at first but then it just becomes sad. Does the journo actually not understand engines at all?

This from Autocar:


It contradicts what Automobile's Jason Cammisa has to say about the lag. Kable finds overtaking to be "effortless", Cammisa reckons it's a chore? Hmmm. Waiting for the EVO and Sport Auto verdicts. Personally, I can't believe that the F10 M5 suffers from any significant amount of lag. Not with that turbo setup - no way. Maybe Cammisa put his car into limp mode. :D

Edit: Cammisa also mentions this in his write-up:


Erm, Jason, such Torque Vectoring systems (like on fast Audis and other AWD BMWs) has been design specifically to mitigate the understeer inherent in an AWD vehicle. They enable the multiplication of torque to the given rear wheel with the most grip thus increasing yaw at the rear. Of course a powerful, rear wheel drive car with a limited slip differential - unfettered by a driven front axle - will do much the same and more.

Also in complete contradiction to what Edmund's review says -
...the engine feel much more responsive than it does in the X5 M and X6 M

And as for the torque vectoring, I think the new Active M differential has some torque vectoring functionality or at least that is what the press release sounded like to me, though it sounds like it uses it more to stabilize the car than beat under steer -

BMW M cars are equipped with a specially developed differential for the rear axle to allow the driver to enjoy the benefits of rear-wheel drive to the full – in the form of the sharpest possible driving dynamics. A variable locking function splits engine power between the right and left rear wheel to generate maximum traction. Another innovation in this area that is fitted in the new BMW M5 ensures even more precise distribution of drive according to the situation at hand; the Active M Differential optimises stability with the help of an electronically controlled multi-plate limited-slip differential, which intervenes at an early stage to prevent wheel spin.

The rear axle’s multi-plate limited-slip differential works with extremely high precision and speed. Its control unit is connected with the DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) system via FlexRay high-speed data transfer technology and constantly cross-checks the data collected by its sensors with the feedback from DSC. It then uses this information to calculate the locking force required to deliver optimum traction and stability. The data recorded by DSC sensors is also passed on if the stability control system is switched off. The locking force within the differential can be set between 0 and 100 per cent. The Anti-lock Braking System retains full functionality in all situations.

In addition to its own data and that provided by DSC, the Active M Differential’s control unit also takes into account the position of the accelerator pedal, the rotational speed of the wheels and the car’s yaw rate. Every driving situation is therefore precisely analysed and an impending loss of traction on one side of the car identified at an early stage. The degree of lock is adjusted as required within a fraction of a second, enabling wheel spin to be prevented on slippery surfaces, in instances where the right and left rear wheel have widely differing friction coefficients, in tight bends and when changing direction extremely dynamically. Optimising traction in this way also provides unbeatable driving stability in challenging conditions and allows impressively dynamic acceleration out of corners. Plus, the Active M Differential also counteracts – to great effect – a loss of traction during double lane changes at high speed and a tendency to understeer under sudden load alterations during dynamic cornering.
 
The marginal turbo lag (only experienced by owners/drivers the past decade of high-revving NA V8; V10; V12 engines) in the ultra-modern turbo-charged engine's of today - we simply or they simply have to get used to today. Because turbo-charging and turbo engines are here to stay for the foreseeable future.;)
 
The standard of automotive journalism is on the decline. Since when does the first drive of an M5 by Autocar not go to Steve Sutcliffe? The 501 foot-pound to NM torque confusion is laughable at first but then it just becomes sad. Does the journo actually not understand engines at all?

Yes, in honesty it's quite a sad state of affairs - that people will go around waiting for press drives to make their mind up on the car, and then subsuquently being handed some nonsense by someone, who clearly understands very little about cars.

For the record, if the E60 M5 had indeed had 501 foot pounds of torque at 6100 rpm, it would have produced +580 hp at that point, and with the prolonged torque curve at the top of the V10s rev range would have peaked around 685 hp. :D
 
Well,it seems that BMW did great job with new M..
Still,old V10 deserves one more car to breathe in..IMHO :)
 
Jason Cammisa said:
The biggest disappointment with the M5 is turbo lag. Yeah, yeah, how typical that I'm complaining about a turbocharged M5. Actually, I'm not complaining about the fact that the M5 wears turbos: I'm complaining that the S63TU engine has so much more lag than the non-Valvetronic S63 did. In that silly X6M (and the slightly less silly X5M), the turbos were among the most responsive I've ever experienced. Not so in the M5 - the lag is significant enough that you have to drive around it.

And it seems that M's engineers aren't fully using their arsenal of tools (Valvetronic, Double VANOS, direct injection) to mitigate lag. Case in point, drive at highway speeds, and the transmission is in seventh gear. Floor the throttle and you get a fairly quick downshift into third: revs in the top half of the tach, all is well. The problem is that there's no boost, so you get a clutch engagement, followed by no power for a second, followed by massive thrust. Boost should have been built by the time the downshift was done. VW does it and has been doing so for years. What gives?

Oh, and remember: a full second of lag is one thing in a slow car, but think of the opportunity cost in a car like this! A second of lag is means you've missed out on probably some 15 extra mph. Seems like a small problem, but it got old very quickly when trying to pass slower traffic on country roads.


This guy has serious issues with understanding the car's main components & interaction between them. Not to mention he obviously does not know how to drive a car.
 
Also in complete contradiction to what Edmund's review says -

Nuts!

And as for the torque vectoring, I think the new Active M differential has some torque vectoring functionality or at least that is what the press release sounded like to me, though it sounds like it uses it more to stabilize the car than beat under steer -

Sunny, in my opinion the term "Torque Vectoring" is bandied about too readily by car makers thus confusing buyers into thinking that all torque vectoring is the same thing. To my mind, there are two distinct types and for want for better words I would classify them as passive and active torque vectoring.

Most so-called torque vectoring systems out there make use of braking force acting on individual wheels to achieve more or less yaw depending on the requirement. Examples are found in Mercedes' Torque Vectoring Brake, Porsche's PTV and McLaren's Brake Steer system. They all do the same thing: brake one or more wheels in order to achieve a change in directional attitude. I regard these as passive torque vectoring systems.

There are just two systems that I can presently think of that fall into the category of active torque vectoring systems and these are Audi's optional Sports Differential and BMW's DPC rear differential. These systems go one step further than the other torque vectoring types through the use of electrically-driven superimposed gearsets on the output shafts of the differential. As a result these systems are able to speed up (overdrive) the wheel required to mitigate either understeer or oversteer.

This is unlike the variable M-Differential in the M5 which uses an electronic clutch pack to broadly vary the amount of rear differential lock depending on the situation but not overdrive a given wheel.
 
9198e100512b59c89f71b0ab00d26254.webp


dfd5e655da38a2e71e3e427ca0a1c487.webp


2012 BMW M5 Test Drive


M
 
BMW M5 driven full road test car review - BBC Top Gear - BBC Top Gear

It's chuffing excellent. There you go Top Gear-heads, an instant, internet-friendly verdict on the new BMW M5. Go spread the news far and wide.
 
Another good review, this time from Ollie Marriage - formerly of EVO until just recently - who I remember to be quite critical of intangibles like "feel" and "driver involvement". So the new M5 is acquitting itself well so far.
But let's see what Harris or Barker or Meaden has to say about it first...
 
The Car Enthusiast - | First Drive | Utrera, Spain | BMW M5 |

568dbdb792c6c2cc28bfcf667f5c2fcc.jpg


e31d4c438f89e30f682d12e7f05d0639.jpg


9018977931ba0d0d89efe06c61662e87.jpg


11a11415b35ef0e21b12db3f30614a91.jpg


99fe4f2e6f81e67e50a1c346efb6e6f9.jpg


9d2aba418c7a6c34b8052abf388fb031.jpg


6aaff31b370fb5d23344403f200beb3a.jpg


fcb129b8eba2d4d7c2f42edda5a00d70.jpg


c78a5013cc57d137016b660f484d462f.jpg


9d7fe7953e3fbfd09f18d8ceb4e7b205.jpg


4f28f0dd9d6f03182aa601186056284d.jpg


350d8e923ae0d71f190d36e16ad802ea.jpg


11a21c2f3b9d226a72c47f29e1b7f8f2.jpg


9ad97fd4b6eff5c1b4fce8333a0509b0.jpg


aee8f9cddd6ffb33d9dc316d48b5ea9e.jpg


ef6803526b99faedd149378796f0e54e.jpg


449bb5933bb8be96169ee8651fbd7482.jpg


f4892e65d93e9994f34a78c3ceec26a5.jpg


12eb3f000c0b9788d8cc8f3ab58d5d01.jpg


4ab04a045d1ec7cdc43c5a618cbe939d.jpg


43d199ce0ad30e26ca8840788f4800ee.jpg



The fifth-generation of the segment-defining BMW M5 is here and it's more impressive than ever.


While thousands of owners of M Sport cars may not agree with us, we reckon that the M-car look has been diluted by the very existence of the sporty trim level. However, as is often the case, pictures do not do the new M5 justice. It's just butch enough to stand out, yet in a subdued colour should remain restrained enough to use without attracting too much attention. The usual M-car characteristics are present, including gaping front intakes, air outlets in the wider front wings, 19-inch alloys, a modest boot spoiler, rear diffuser and last, but not least, the quad exhaust set-up.

The interior continues where the previous BMW M5 left off. Think of it as a luxury car with sporting overtones rather than a stripped-out track special. There are loads of lovely details specific to the M5, but it's the level of gadgetry that'll strike you on first getting in. More on that in a tick.
Car Enthusiast


M
 

BMW M

BMW M GmbH, formerly known as BMW Motorsport GmbH, is a subsidiary of BMW AG that manufactures high-performance luxury cars. BMW M ("M" for "motorsport") was initially created to facilitate BMW's racing program, which was very successful in the 1960s and 1970s. As time passed, BMW M began to supplement BMW's vehicle portfolio with specially modified higher trim models, for which they are now most known by the general public. These M-badged cars traditionally include modified engines, transmissions, suspensions, interior trims, aerodynamics, and exterior modifications to set them apart from their counterparts. All M models are tested and tuned at BMW's private facility at the Nürburgring racing circuit in Germany.
Official website: BMW M

Trending content


Back
Top