Pictures Why are car sketches so different to the production models?


Rainer271

Kraftwagen König
We look into why car manufacturers put so much effort into producing concept sketches
Early sketches of forthcoming production cars stand out with their futuristic details, aggressive styling and sloping rooflines. So you could be forgiven for wondering why the model doesn’t live up to that tantalising promise by the time the manufacturer has released it into the showroom and it’s parked on your driveway. As your car looks totally different to the drawing, it begs the question: what’s the point?

Safety regulations mean new cars have to adhere to stringent tests, and what you see in that first sketch might not even be attainable. So why do companies go through such trouble to publish these etchings?

Auto Express spoke to designers, brands and safety experts to find out exactly why the final production model doesn’t always match up to those first, alluring sketches... and what the manufacturer gets out of it.

image.webp


This sketch might look very different to the finished Volvo XC90, with its coupe-like three-door layout and very skinny window aperture, but it had its benefits. This drawing was used to show off the headlight and tail-lamp layout.

image.webp



What are the sketches for?
The first thing to clear up is the thinking behind releasing these sketches to the public. For the manufacturer, the aim behind this is fairly straightforward: getting its new car out there.

“The main reason for the images is that they allow us to tell the story of a new car launch over an extended period of time, when we don’t yet have access to physical cars,” a Volvo spokesman explained. “Sketches and teaser images help us to highlight key product features, equipment or design themes that will appear on the finished car.”

That sentiment was echoed by a Hyundai spokeswoman, who told us: “To raise awareness ahead of our new model introduction, we use the design sketch as a way to tease public interest. The strongest attributes are highlighted – perhaps exaggerated compared to the real car – to give an impression of how the production model will look.”

While this enables the manufacturer to give potential customers an early look at a car, for a designer, it could be about getting their more extreme ideas seen by bosses.

image.webp


The grille and basic lines are apparent in the sketch for the Hyundai i20. But the low-slung rooflineand wide wheels are taken to the extreme.

image.webp


“Any designer wants his proposals to be chosen ahead of others and to ‘sell’ his proposal to his boss, and in turn higher management,” said one designer who wished to remain anonymous (we’ll call them designer A). “So everything is done to make that proposal look as good as possible, to give it every chance of being chosen.”

That means things like the wheels are made to look big and tend to be moved out as far as possible in the wheelarches. The suspension is also lowered and the car will be made to look aggressive, with a wide and low stance, too.

However, this exaggerated look doesn’t last throughout the project as the real product begins to take shape, although designers will still continue to add some flair in their designs. “The level of exaggeration usually decreases as the project moves forward and becomes more realistic, so the initial freehand sketches are often quite cartoonish, while later renderings become more realistic. But even then there are still plenty of tricks used by the designer to try to favour his proposal,” designer A explained.

While these early sketches appear to be the birth of a model, this isn’t always the case according to another designer we spoke to (who also wanted to keep their identity secret, so we’ll call them designer B). They said: “Many of the sketches you’ve seen released by companies are drawn after the car has been designed, in order to tell a story.

“Most of the sketches that are actually developed into clay models are very rarely released for various reasons.” In fact, he claimed the public don’t usually see the sketches from the beginning of the project.

image.webp


Mysterious teaser etching of the Kia Sorento went to extremes of the final design. The rear spoiler and window shape may look familiar, but the chunky wheels and smooth finish didn’t make it.

image.webp


Even if these sketches are produced after the actual car has been designed, if a manufacturer goes too far with its exaggerated illustrations, it can backfire if the finished product looks totally different. “This can be self-defeating once the car is put on the real package and a realistic model is presented which doesn’t resemble the sketches any more,” designer A said.

Adding a touch of style
What the design sketch or illustration does allow a manufacturer to do, however, is show off a bit of flair. This is something that can be key for makers that don’t have the most stylish range of cars on the market. “Every company wants to tell a design story and so flashy sketches add to the drama. Every designer has to ‘stretch the truth’ to make their vision look more appealing to the management choosing the themes,” designer B explained.

While these drawings can show off a wilder side to a designer or manufacturer, problems can occur later down the line for a maker if it does try and retain some of the more unrealistic dimensions and features of the design drawings.

image.webp


There doesn’t seem to be much difference between the Skoda Fabia and the illustration, but look closer and it’s clear the sketched version gets larger, protruding wheels and a lower roofline.

image.webp


“I know a company where one car was designed all the way to a full-size model and then rejected a number of times. The 2D and sketch presentations always went well, only for the car to disappoint when it was made in to a full-size model,” designer A claimed.

“There was another car that had wheelarches which were out of proportion – they were much too big – if it had anything but the biggest optional 18-inch wheels fitted. The design manager always chose to present it with massive wheels to make the project proceed and beat other proposals. In the end the car didn’t look good with the usual 16 or 17-inch wheels it nearly always has in real life.”

Safety problems
The main stumbling block for manufacturers, however, is the increasingly stringent safety standards they have to adhere to. “The biggest constraint is pedestrian protection,” explained Matthew Avery, from motor insurance industry research body Thatcham. “You can’t have a small bonnet. Cars need to have a longish bonnet and flat front end to comply with new crash tests. Then there are more detailed things, such as the angle of the windscreen. This has to be right in order to stop the driver getting any glare.”

image.webp


Illustrations for the Suzuki SX4 S-Cross took the extreme wheel approach to another level with barely any tyre visible. The window aperture and low-slung windscreen were also some way off the finished model.

image.webp


It’s not just the exterior design that soon becomes watered down. The elaborate images of minimalist interiors and one-piece seats have to make way for more practical production parts. “The airbag has to be able to fit in the steering wheel and dashboard, so you have to think where this will be deployed,” added Avery. “For seats, you can’t have sculpted one-piece versions as they must have head restraints close to the head that are movable.”

Despite the constraints on manufacturers, and the potential pitfalls that come with the more elaborate attempts, the lure of creating something more stylish than the final product to tempt a buyer is often too great. As designer A admitted: “It would of course be better to have a more realistic, holistic approach to the design process, but unless that’s instilled from the top of a company then a designer is always going to try to make his work look as cool as possible, even if it’s not 100 per cent realistic."

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-ne...ketches-so-different-to-the-production-models
 
We look into why car manufacturers put so much effort into producing concept sketches
Early sketches of forthcoming production cars stand out with their futuristic details, aggressive styling and sloping rooflines. So you could be forgiven for wondering why the model doesn’t live up to that tantalising promise by the time the manufacturer has released it into the showroom and it’s parked on your driveway. As your car looks totally different to the drawing, it begs the question: what’s the point?

Safety regulations mean new cars have to adhere to stringent tests, and what you see in that first sketch might not even be attainable. So why do companies go through such trouble to publish these etchings?

Auto Express spoke to designers, brands and safety experts to find out exactly why the final production model doesn’t always match up to those first, alluring sketches... and what the manufacturer gets out of it.

image.webp


This sketch might look very different to the finished Volvo XC90, with its coupe-like three-door layout and very skinny window aperture, but it had its benefits. This drawing was used to show off the headlight and tail-lamp layout.

image.webp



What are the sketches for?
The first thing to clear up is the thinking behind releasing these sketches to the public. For the manufacturer, the aim behind this is fairly straightforward: getting its new car out there.

“The main reason for the images is that they allow us to tell the story of a new car launch over an extended period of time, when we don’t yet have access to physical cars,” a Volvo spokesman explained. “Sketches and teaser images help us to highlight key product features, equipment or design themes that will appear on the finished car.”

That sentiment was echoed by a Hyundai spokeswoman, who told us: “To raise awareness ahead of our new model introduction, we use the design sketch as a way to tease public interest. The strongest attributes are highlighted – perhaps exaggerated compared to the real car – to give an impression of how the production model will look.”

While this enables the manufacturer to give potential customers an early look at a car, for a designer, it could be about getting their more extreme ideas seen by bosses.

image.webp


The grille and basic lines are apparent in the sketch for the Hyundai i20. But the low-slung rooflineand wide wheels are taken to the extreme.

image.webp


“Any designer wants his proposals to be chosen ahead of others and to ‘sell’ his proposal to his boss, and in turn higher management,” said one designer who wished to remain anonymous (we’ll call them designer A). “So everything is done to make that proposal look as good as possible, to give it every chance of being chosen.”

That means things like the wheels are made to look big and tend to be moved out as far as possible in the wheelarches. The suspension is also lowered and the car will be made to look aggressive, with a wide and low stance, too.

However, this exaggerated look doesn’t last throughout the project as the real product begins to take shape, although designers will still continue to add some flair in their designs. “The level of exaggeration usually decreases as the project moves forward and becomes more realistic, so the initial freehand sketches are often quite cartoonish, while later renderings become more realistic. But even then there are still plenty of tricks used by the designer to try to favour his proposal,” designer A explained.

While these early sketches appear to be the birth of a model, this isn’t always the case according to another designer we spoke to (who also wanted to keep their identity secret, so we’ll call them designer B). They said: “Many of the sketches you’ve seen released by companies are drawn after the car has been designed, in order to tell a story.

“Most of the sketches that are actually developed into clay models are very rarely released for various reasons.” In fact, he claimed the public don’t usually see the sketches from the beginning of the project.

image.webp


Mysterious teaser etching of the Kia Sorento went to extremes of the final design. The rear spoiler and window shape may look familiar, but the chunky wheels and smooth finish didn’t make it.

image.webp


Even if these sketches are produced after the actual car has been designed, if a manufacturer goes too far with its exaggerated illustrations, it can backfire if the finished product looks totally different. “This can be self-defeating once the car is put on the real package and a realistic model is presented which doesn’t resemble the sketches any more,” designer A said.

Adding a touch of style
What the design sketch or illustration does allow a manufacturer to do, however, is show off a bit of flair. This is something that can be key for makers that don’t have the most stylish range of cars on the market. “Every company wants to tell a design story and so flashy sketches add to the drama. Every designer has to ‘stretch the truth’ to make their vision look more appealing to the management choosing the themes,” designer B explained.

While these drawings can show off a wilder side to a designer or manufacturer, problems can occur later down the line for a maker if it does try and retain some of the more unrealistic dimensions and features of the design drawings.

image.webp


There doesn’t seem to be much difference between the Skoda Fabia and the illustration, but look closer and it’s clear the sketched version gets larger, protruding wheels and a lower roofline.

image.webp


“I know a company where one car was designed all the way to a full-size model and then rejected a number of times. The 2D and sketch presentations always went well, only for the car to disappoint when it was made in to a full-size model,” designer A claimed.

“There was another car that had wheelarches which were out of proportion – they were much too big – if it had anything but the biggest optional 18-inch wheels fitted. The design manager always chose to present it with massive wheels to make the project proceed and beat other proposals. In the end the car didn’t look good with the usual 16 or 17-inch wheels it nearly always has in real life.”

Safety problems
The main stumbling block for manufacturers, however, is the increasingly stringent safety standards they have to adhere to. “The biggest constraint is pedestrian protection,” explained Matthew Avery, from motor insurance industry research body Thatcham. “You can’t have a small bonnet. Cars need to have a longish bonnet and flat front end to comply with new crash tests. Then there are more detailed things, such as the angle of the windscreen. This has to be right in order to stop the driver getting any glare.”

image.webp


Illustrations for the Suzuki SX4 S-Cross took the extreme wheel approach to another level with barely any tyre visible. The window aperture and low-slung windscreen were also some way off the finished model.

image.webp


It’s not just the exterior design that soon becomes watered down. The elaborate images of minimalist interiors and one-piece seats have to make way for more practical production parts. “The airbag has to be able to fit in the steering wheel and dashboard, so you have to think where this will be deployed,” added Avery. “For seats, you can’t have sculpted one-piece versions as they must have head restraints close to the head that are movable.”

Despite the constraints on manufacturers, and the potential pitfalls that come with the more elaborate attempts, the lure of creating something more stylish than the final product to tempt a buyer is often too great. As designer A admitted: “It would of course be better to have a more realistic, holistic approach to the design process, but unless that’s instilled from the top of a company then a designer is always going to try to make his work look as cool as possible, even if it’s not 100 per cent realistic."

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-ne...ketches-so-different-to-the-production-models

Yes, this is somewhat accurate. However, there is one word I hate more than anything in the automotive industry (especially regarding design). That would be "watered down". You cannot be taking the likes of motor show vehicles, such as the Concept S-Class Coupe and 4-Series Coupe Concept, then claim they've been "neutered"/"watered down". That is grossly false, when advanced design departments are taking a production proposal and reverse engineering them for the auto show circuit over a 4-9 month period (sometimes longer).
745b4e62d60c4f12e5490e6322eedf13.webp

941fbaa93a0a28afa63c7862fc539a5a.webp



6f19146834e8038b0af5b70f3aa0667c.webp
bd088a25f0c18b622450e3978c4c559f.webp
232789604e20cb72f1f76ad557b914b5.webp

c8e749b6925fe836fcf22eb4dcbbf2b2.webp

d68b8f9a71bc3ddd69ae72493bbe03ff.webp

287f4a04bfe492a367c415127e9b5161.webp



If not for the need of guarding intellectual property, if some of those that believed such nonsense, walked into certain areas of the FIZ or Sindelfingen Center in 2011, they would see how that doesn't fit as they thought. The C217 and F32 would be present in each place.

I think I've told this story so many times, but X152 F-Type design was approved about 4 years ago in the spring of 2011. Just 5-6 months ahead of the IAA C-X16 intro. The C-X16 was BASED on the F-Type, not the other way around. The timeline reasoning of concept-to-production doesn't fit, yet many lazy journalists will peddle otherwise and mislead their readers.

The same applies to 3 upcoming Infinitis I saw 3 months ago, yet their "concept" versions are clearly reverse-engineered. Bad journalism and deceitful marketing plays into how the public falls for this idea, that you can show a "concept" car and have the production model finished+shown in just a few months. Two of those Infinitis had their production body design achieved by 2 years ago, with one due next year. The third was "corrected" under executive orders, despite condescending denial from the brand's design director, and also due next year.

A design study and preview concept are not the same. The Lexus LF-LC is a design study, as it is independent of and not based on an existing production development. The production model was frozen 2 years later. The Lexus LF-NX, was merely a spruced up production NX, in being developed during 2013 for IAA. The NX production design was final by mid-2012 and reached 3 years ago (answered via my question).
6df8a194b460509714a970ac4a0f33be.webp

57a5f0dbb0fc2a59f4b62ed9f27e8c7d.webp

94b3de8851da0cabd996b60c59d26154.webp

dd9431d9c825a35ef496fe463756bf37.webp


The Z9 GT in 1999 was developed off of the E65 7er, then became the E63 6er in 2000 and fully realised by February 2001. That took over 4 years until launch in late 2003. The BMW Vision EfficientDynamics of 2009 was merely a design study, as the i8 had yet to be finished. In that case, one can complain about it being "watered-down". A lot of people, as well as part of the media, have the false impression that the Vision Future Luxury was "watered-down" for the G11/12. That is false, as I bet my father's house on it, that the VFL was developed after it and SCOTT can prove that anyway.


6f94c17a8a2938564ca58b17b85765d9.webp


0c88b378308cc654e68d1fbb89f95646.webp


As for sketches, the above information is very accurate. One also should be able to tell the difference between an early and a post-design approval sketch. There are certain sketches I've noticed that clearly have immense closeness to a production model, that I cannot help but assume, it is after the design freeze. Jacek Fröhlich drew these F10 sketches in 2008. The final design was reached in December 2006 and frozen by mid-2007. Someone could easily lie from BMW and claim "it's an early sketch". An "early" sketch would've something drawn in 2005-06, not 2008.
252617a66bfbf48525dd6d63fb8dede8.webp

d20c619a77b205adef03e318e7a5f5cd.webp


Also look at these November 1992 sketches of the W220 S-Class by Steve Mattin. Compare it to his 1994 sketch (last), quarter scale, and then the 1:1 design model. These are truly "early" sketches, not something like that F10 example.

a98f4941bot380.webp
a98f4941top380.webp
a98f4933380.webp

a98f4932380.webp

a98f4024380.webp

a98f4038256.webp

w220hl2.webp


Compare these W140 sketches/paintings from 1984 (by Haussmann and another designer) to these V12 examples by Olivier Boulay (W140 designer) from February 19 and 26, 1988. The W140 design approval meeting was on December 9, 1986, dimensional changes were made during 1987, and design patents filed on February 23, 1988 (Aug. 23, 1988 in US) in West Germany (1992 date is US registration date). Except for discarding of a special V12 grille (traditional MB form like W126) in 1990, nothing changed between 1988 and 1991.
093d92cf13a8a20e00ee6e075d3127de.webp

1713db880939034ed58e3089572faf5c.webp


1986/12/09 W140 Design Meeting
5b94caf4a2d8ac9699e6dde8ae3b6bb3.webp

W140 Sketch by Olivier Boulay
04a426f8614ab3b88e76470d53470862.webp

Februar 1988 Sketches
e38f1593b686d6b26165c3e6ea68d87f.webp

ba2871073e3b74b19315db4ac0da68d3.webp

February 23, 1988 Patent Sketch
558de65e80d0fe4c00f43ea570346cd0.webp

Original 600SEL Grille circa 1989-90
6c58325d59db83a8769ba045db1330c2.webp

January 30, 1990 Deutschland Patent for "600S"
900063000101.webp

900064100101.webp

W140 Fibreglass Model (seems to be much later than 1986 example above)
W140 Design Modell.webp

It seems that German Car Forum is uniquely one of the few sites that doesn't fall prey to this theory of last-minute development and can usually see through the wool very well against misleading marketing drivel. I wish I could say more on this right now, but I have to go to bed.
 
Obviously I understand that concept sketches and models are not subject to the constraints of real-world requirements .......but there are so many examples of wonderful concepts that were drained of every last drop of inspiration.

(Exhibit A) 1999 Cadillac Evoq Concept

69d767516427575ec2760ba00df8d38a.webp


16 years on and Cadillac still have not built a production vehicle with styling as well-resolved as this.
 
Obviously I understand that concept sketches and models are not subject to the constraints of real-world requirements .......but there are so many examples of wonderful concepts that were drained of every last drop of inspiration.

(Exhibit A) 1999 Cadillac Evoq Concept

69d767516427575ec2760ba00df8d38a.webp


16 years on and Cadillac still have not built a production vehicle with styling as well-resolved as this.
The Evoq eventually became the XLR (2000 final sign-off), but I do get your point though.
19cae4e956f5554b7790ae7f257672d6.webp
 

Thread statistics

Created
Rainer271,
Last reply from
Carmaker1,
Replies
3
Views
9,495

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top