The Avtoros Shaman, of course.
![]()
But seriously, that question does not work on its own. Safest for whom? A car that's safe for the occupants (i.e. big and heavy) might be more dangerous for other road users in the case of an accident. And of course, if you're driving a 'safe' car (meaning you're less worried what might happen to you if you crash) you might take unnecessary risks which could mean that you're more likely to have an accident. So, all in all, 'it depends' is the only correct answer.
A quick google search indicates that the safest car ever tested by EuroNCAP is indeed the current Volvo XC90.
Performance is also fundamental for a car's safety, because you really don't want to be driving an slow car when overtaking a lorry.
Acceleration times from 0 to 62 mph or 0 to 100 kph are good for marketing, but in real life, what matters most are acceleration times from 50 to 80 mph or 80 to 120 kph.
Any car that takes 10 seconds or more to accelerate from 50 mph to 80 mph or 80 kph to 120 kph can be considered dangerous for road use.
I once drove a 55 bhp VW Fox and I had to downshift to third gear and nearly blow the engine to overtake an small truck on a stretch of road. Overtaking in that piece of shit was always a nerve racking experience. You don't know how ****ing big a truck is until you have to overtake one in a badly underpowered car.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.