Golf Volkswagen Mk I Golf


SDNR

Kraftwagen König
Messages
10,192
So here we are ...the last section without a single thread.

This has always been a favourite small car of mine ...it still is cooler than any of it's sucessors.

I'm going to be lazy here and just lift the info from wikipedia.com.

VW Mk I GOLF
b5b473fedf599cb4e5948afd1abd7d09.webp

Mk I (1974–present) - I bet you didn't know they still made them in South Africa. (maybe you did ...but I sure didn't)

The first Golf began production in 1974. Marketed in the United States and Canada from 1975 to 1984 as the Volkswagen Rabbit and in Mexico as the Volkswagen Caribe, it featured the water-cooled, front wheel drive design pioneered by the Citroën Traction Avant in 1934 with the addition of a hatchback pioneered by the Renault 4 in 1961. The Golf was Wheels magazine's Car of the Year for 1975.
While the Golf was not the first design with this layout (earlier examples being the Austin and Morris Mini of 1959, the Austin Maxi in the late 1960s and the Fiat 128 3P of the early 1970s), it was very successful, especially since it married these features with Volkswagen's reputation for solid build-quality and reliable engineering.
The Golf was designed by Italian automobile architect / designer Giorgetto Giugiaro, of the ItalDesign design studio. A version of this original Golf model, known as the Volkswagen CitiGolf, is still produced in South Africa as an entry level car.
In 1978, Volkswagen commenced producing the Rabbit version of the Mk1 Golf in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, thus becoming the first European car manufacturer in modern times to produce a vehicle in the United States. Former Chevrolet executive James McLernon was chosen to run the factory, which was built to lower the cost of the Rabbit in North America by producing it locally. Unfortunately, McLernon tried to "Americanize" the Rabbit by softening the suspension and using cheaper materials for the interior. VW purists in America and company executives in Germany were displeased, and for the 1983 model year the Pennsylvania plant went back to using stiffer shocks and suspension with higher-quality interior trim. The plant also began producing the GTI for the North American market. (Rabbits were built in Pennsylvania through 1984.) The first VW Caddy pick-up, based on the Mk1 Golf, was also created at the Pennsylvania plant.
The GTI version, launched in Europe in 1976 and in the US in 1983, virtually created the hot hatch genre overnight, and many other manufacturers since have created special sports models of their regular volume selling small hatchbacks. It was one of the first small cars to adopt fuel injection for its sports version, which raised power output of the 1588 cc engine to 110 PS (81 kW/108 hp). In 2004, Sports Car International announced the GTI Mk I as the 3rd best car of the 1980s. In the United States, the Mk1 Golf GTI was known as the Rabbit GTI. For background to the development of the GTI, read, "The People's Porsche", an undergraduate dissertation.
There was a minor facelift in 1980 for North American versions only, which saw the adoption of larger rear lamp clusters (more in line with Guigiaro's original concepts), larger bumpers, square headlights and a new dashboard with a more modern-looking instrument display.
The convertible version, named the Cabriolet, was sold from 1980 to 1993 (a convertible version of the Golf II was not made, so the Mk1 cabrio with slight modification was produced until the introduction of the Mk III cabrio). It had a reinforced body, transverse roll bar, and a high level of trim. The A1 Volkswagen convertible is of unibody construction built entirely at the factory of Karmann, from stamping to final assembly; Volkswagen supplied the engine, suspension, interior, etc. for Karmann to install. The vinyl tops were insulated and manually operated, with a glass rear window.
As of 2006, Volkswagen of South Africa still manufactures two first generation Golfs, the four-door "Citi" Golf and the "Pickup".

1d96ee0bd0287180e60d41db6a5ce46b.webp


 
My friend had this car at one time. It was nice, but had to many problems. However, it may have been due to the ill maintained schedule.
 
They're pretty basic ....and interior build quality is terrible ..but I think they are quite charismatic ...certainly much more so than the Mk II model.
 
Roberto said:
They're pretty basic ....and interior build quality is terrible ..but I think they are quite charismatic ...certainly much more so than the Mk II model.


I agree with you here. They are somewhat like the older beetle, small cute and easily reperable.
 
The Mk I Golf GTi is still considered by many car magazines to be one of the best hot hatches ever, even when compared to modern cars. I'd love to try one some day but finding an unmolested example would be quite hard.
 
MikeJ said:
The Mk I Golf GTi is still considered by many car magazines to be one of the best hot hatches ever, even when compared to modern cars. I'd love to try one some day but finding an unmolested example would be quite hard.


nice choice of words there. unmolsted this is a good word. These guys have been treated horribly and still serve their significant others.
 
No, did not know they still make them in South Africa. That was my last car while living in South Africa. Had one from 1981 to early 1986. At the time I thought it was the greatest car I had ever had. Liked it so much I might still get one for daily driving one day.
 
Roberto said:
They're pretty basic ....and interior build quality is terrible ..but I think they are quite charismatic ...certainly much more so than the Mk II model.

What about the Mk V Golf? How do you feel about it?
 
I like the Mk V model Mirage77 ...it's a nice little car ...and well made too. But it isn't as special as the Mk I for me.

The Mk I was far closer to the spirit of the original "Beetle" ...it was a reasonably priced car for literally everybody. It was classless and egalitarian ...a true "Peoples car". Somehow in this era of corporate-globalization, the fading memories of Communism in Europe, and the rise of China as the world's greatest capitalist country, the whole socialist idea of "a peoples car" seems suddenly very old fashioned indeed.

I just realized the irony of me talking about egalitarianism ....I spend almost all my time here discussing S classes, Phantoms, and Zondas.
 
I love the Mk I. I didn't expect you to make a post about an everyman's car, Rob.

Take a look at the horsepower figures of a MK I Golf or mid-1980s VW Jetta compared to today's model. Horsepower has doubled! But oh yeah, there is this funny question about why gas prices are so high. . . Cut down the engine power already. Most drivers don't need 200-hp from a VW Golf!
 
450SEL 6.9 said:
I love the Mk I. I didn't expect you to make a post about an everyman's car, Rob.
Lol, yes, I guess I can give the impression that I am not interested in anything modest .....but there is a simple nobility in such unassuming modesty ...the original Golf is a car I have a great fondness for.
 
450SEL 6.9 said:
Take a look at the horsepower figures of a MK I Golf or mid-1980s VW Jetta compared to today's model. Horsepower has doubled! But oh yeah, there is this funny question about why gas prices are so high. . . Cut down the engine power already. Most drivers don't need 200-hp from a VW Golf!
Around double the weight (mainly due to vastly improved safety measures) would have somethin to do with the need for extra HP........ of course, so does consumer expectation - if they're paying more money for a newer car they generally expect it to 'go the extra mile', as they say.

Here's a nice, albeit rather simplistic comparison of the original GTI and the MkIV R32.... by none other than Jeremy Clarkson....
http://www.filewire.com/download.php?id=cd5828b21c6a886fa9f588e
 
Well here is a little extra info.

After the succes of the Mini and the reply/creation of the supermini class, VW needed to get in the game.
They were deperate to get FWD techology so as to create Bettle succesor in the supermini class.
Daimler Benz were desperate to get rid of Auto Union, so a deal was made between the 2 companies.
Even with AU VW situation was not got, so the goverment steped in and gave VW a loan to create the Bettle replacement.
Ofcourse before WW II AUs DKW (in that moment the only surviving of the AU brands) was VWs arch nemesis, and Germany's (DKW) people's car.
This might be the reason why VW killed the DKW brand and resurected the Audi brand.
When VW bought NSU they gained another FWD player to the group.
 
Imhotep Evil said:
Well here is a little extra info.

After the succes of the Mini and the reply/creation of the supermini class, VW needed to get in the game.
They were deperate to get FWD techology so as to create Bettle succesor in the supermini class.
Daimler Benz were desperate to get rid of Auto Union, so a deal was made between the 2 companies.
Even with AU VW situation was not got, so the goverment steped in and gave VW a loan to create the Bettle replacement.
Ofcourse before WW II AUs DKW (in that moment the only surviving of the AU brands) was VWs arch nemesis, and Germany's (DKW) people's car.
This might be the reason why VW killed the DKW brand and resurected the Audi brand.
When VW bought NSU they gained another FWD player to the group.
Good information:usa7uh: I'd like to add that while one can say that DKW was killed and Audi resurrected, it should be noted that the main issue with the DKWs was that they were two-stroke machines and by 1964 -1965 two stroke machines were getting to be symbols of times long past and four stroke engines sounded good and consumers bought them. The DKW F102 actually did not look all that different from the first "new" Audi. The looks were similar but the two-stroke engines had given way to the nice sounding four stroke engines.
 
Germaniac said:
Around double the weight (mainly due to vastly improved safety measures) would have somethin to do with the need for extra HP........ of course, so does consumer expectation - if they're paying more money for a newer car they generally expect it to 'go the extra mile', as they say.

Double the weight? The weight has increased, but I believe it is only to the order of 50, 60% for most cars. I think it is mainly new car buyers wanting 200 hp under their foot in a small car. Anyway, I'm just suggesting that there is more to blame for gas prices than oil companies. Consumers have to look at their own driving habits and love of gas guzzling vehicles.
 
450SEL 6.9 said:
Double the weight? The weight has increased, but I believe it is only to the order of 50, 60% for most cars. I think it is mainly new car buyers wanting 200 hp under their foot in a small car. Anyway, I'm just suggesting that there is more to blame for gas prices than oil companies. Consumers have to look at their own driving habits and love of gas guzzling vehicles.
Yeah I'm not sure on the exact figures and may have exaggerated for the sake of effect, but the MkIV Golf R32 (which I was referring to in the earlier post) was between 1400-1500kgs, the MkI being around 800-900kgs??

As for "gas guzzling" engines being a reason for petrol prices, I'm not fully convinced that fuel economy in cars has gotten dramatically worse over the years, especially in mainstream models, despite increase in power... I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure efficiency (along with greater performance for no loss in fuel economy) is something that modern engines do better than ever - I think it's unfair to look at a 'halo' sports car like the GTI (which by no means is a mainstream model, nor representitive of most car-buyers - the most popular Golf models in Australia are the 2.0TDI, 1.6l and 2.0FSI) and say that its 200hp engine is the reason for gas prices - considering 1) gas guzzling vehicles have been around since ... well, since cars themselves existed 2) cars, not only engines, have typically become more fuel efficient over the decades, despite increases in weight/performance, and 3) looking at typical American cars from the 70s and 80s, for example, I certainly don't see how the desire for stonking, big, gas-guzzling, large-capacity engines is anything new; simply that now those same big engines are more efficient, cleaner burning and provide more performance with no effect to fuel economy.

A simple comparison would be the BMW E39 535i (3.5l V8) to the E60 530i (3.0l I6), both of which my dad has purchased - the newer car is bigger in every respect, has vastly superior active and passive safety features and more luxury features (both of which would most logically add weight), a healthy 20kw power advantage, a shaved 0-100km/h time by around 1 second, and yet has significantly better fuel economy and a smaller engine. Go figure, but I'm basically trying to illustrate that while sure, car buyers today may expect more powerful cars (I think I said something to that effect in my previous post), in most cases that comes at no sacrifice to fuel economy, engine efficiency or an engine's 'green' credentials.
 
Wow Roberto, this has made it very clear for me. We share the exact same taste in cars! In every thread that I've seen a gorgeous pic of a car I can always find a comment of yours that would have been quite similar to what I would have written, and you have done it again :)
 

Volkswagen

Volkswagen AG, also known as the Volkswagen Group, is a German multinational automotive manufacturer headquartered in Wolfsburg, Lower Saxony, Germany. Founded in 1937 in Berlin, Germany, the Volkswagen Group sells passenger cars under the Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Cupra, Jetta, Lamborghini, Porsche, SEAT, Škoda, and Volkswagen brands; motorcycles under the Ducati name, light commercial vehicles under the Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles brand, and heavy commercial vehicles via the marques of the listed subsidiary Traton (Navistar, MAN, Scania and Volkswagen Truck & Bus).
Official website: Volkswagen

Trending content


Back
Top