Road tests The Official Lap Times Thread - Supertest / Acceleration / Track Battles etc...


My latest comparison datapanel :)

AutoBild Sportscars - Versus M2 vs. BMW M2.webp
 
Holy crap, that thing pulls my underpants off from 250 to 400km/h!!!
0-100km/h in 4.49sec :sleep:
0-160km/h in 5.99sec :unsure:
0-200Km/h in 7.26sec (y)
0-250km/h in 8.66sec :oops:
0-300km/h in 10sec :eek:
0-322km/h (200mph) in 10.83sec :eek:o_O:poop:
0-350km/h in 11.99sec :poop::eek::nailbiting::poop::poop::eek::eek:
0-400km/h in 14.12sec :nailbiting::nailbiting::nailbiting::nailbiting::nailbiting::poop::poop::poop::poop::poop::eek::eek::eek:

f#cking epic. So about 9 seconds 400-0km/h.🙂

+/- 1 second.
 
Autocar Road Test - Lotus Eletre R

lotus_eletre.jpg



Lap Time:
-

Acceleration (mph) / [21deg C, dry]:

0-30:
1.5
0-40: 2.0
0-50: 2.5
0-60: 3.1
0-70: 3.7
0-80: 4.5
0-90: 5.5
0-100: 6.5
0-110: 7.6
0-120: 9.0
0-130: 10.8
0-140: 13.1
0-150: 16.2
0-160: 20.8

1/4 Mile - 10.9s @ 131.1mph

0-1000m: 20.0s @ 158.7mph

30 - 70mph: 2.2s

Max Speeds in Gear:

1st:
13.6:1 ratio
2nd: 7.2:1 ratio

Braking:

60-0:
2.70s

30-0: 9.4 m
50-0: 25.9 m
70-0: 49.4 m

Tires Brand: Pirelli P Zero Corsa
Tires Size: 275/40/22 | 315/35/22

Drag coefficient: 0.26

Weight: 2,682 kg
Weight Distribution: 48/52%

Price as tested: £164,740

Autocar Rivals Ranking:

1st:
Porsche Cayenne Coupe Turbo E-Hybrid - 4.5/5
2nd: BMW iX M60 - 4/5
3rd: Lotus Eletre R - 3.5/5
4th:
Mercedes-AMG EQS 53 - 3.5/5
5th: Audi SQ8 E-Tron Sportback - 3/5
 
Autocar Road Test - Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance Estate

merc_c63amg.webp



Lap Time:
-

Acceleration (mph) / [22deg C, dry]:

0-30:
1.3
0-40: 1.9
0-50: 2.5
0-60: 3.3
0-70: 4.1
0-80: 5.3
0-90: 6.4
0-100: 7.6
0-110: 9.3
0-120: 11.4
0-130: 13.8
0-140: 16.6
0-150: 20.8

1/4 Mile - 11.5s @ 120.3mph

0-1000m: 21.2s @ 150.8mph

30 - 70mph: 2.8s

Max Speeds in Gear:

1st:
33mph @ 7000rpm
2nd: 54mph @ 7000rpm
3rd: 78mph @ 7000rpm
4th: 107mph @ 7000rpm
5th: 145mph @ 7000rpm
6th: 168mph @ 6698rpm
7th: 168mph @ 5827rpm
8th: 168mph @ 4822rpm
9th: 168mph @ 4019rpm*

Braking:

60-0:
2.45s

30-0: 8.2 m
50-0: 22.3 m
70-0: 43.6 m

Tires Brand: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S (M0)
Tires Size: 265/35/20 | 275/35/20

Drag coefficient: n/a

Weight: 2,217 kg
Weight Distribution: 48/52%

Price as tested: £102,476

Autocar Rivals Ranking:

1st:
BMW M3 Touring Competition - 4/5
2nd: Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio- 4/5
3rd: Jaguar F-Pace SVR 575 Edition - 4/5
4th: Audi RS4 Avant - 3.5/5
5th: Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance Estate - 3/5
 
Autocar Road Test - Mercedes-AMG GT 63 4Matic+

merc_amg_gt.webp



Lap Time:
-

Acceleration (mph) / 18deg C, sunny:

0-30:
1.2
0-40: 1.7
0-50: 2.4
0-60: 3.1
0-70: 4.0
0-80: 4.9
0-90: 6.1
0-100: 7.4
0-110: 8.9
0-120: 10.6
0-130: 12.7

1/4 Mile - 11.4s @ 123.6mph

0-1000m: -

30 - 70mph: 2.7s

Max Speeds in Gear:

1st:
34mph @ 7000rpm
2nd: 55mph @ 7000rpm
3rd: 80mph @ 7000rpm
4th: 109mph @ 7000rpm
5th: 148mph @ 7000rpm
6th: 180mph @ 7000rpm
7th: 196mph @ 5960rpm
8th: 196mph @ 5501rpm
9th: 196mph @ 4584rpm*

Braking:

60-0:
2.35s

30-0: 8.3 m
50-0: 22.0 m
70-0: 42.5 m

Tires Brand: Michelin Pilot Sport S 5
Tires Size: 295/30/21 | 305/30/21

Drag coefficient: n/a

Weight: 1,972 kg
Weight Distribution: 54/46%

Price as tested: £164,605

Autocar Rivals Ranking:

1st:
Ferrari Roma - 4.5/5
2nd: Porsche 992 Turbo - 4.5/5
3rd: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 4Matic+ - 3.5/5
4th:
Aston Martin Vantage - n/a
5th: Maserati GranTurismo Trofeo - n/a
 
Not Mercedes's day, is it? And that's them being lucky there were no lap times.

Sad there is no lap time for the Eletre, though, I was quite curious about that.
 
Autocar Road Test - Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance Estate

merc_c63amg.webp



Lap Time:
-

Acceleration (mph) / [22deg C, dry]:

0-30:
1.3
0-40: 1.9
0-50: 2.5
0-60: 3.3
0-70: 4.1
0-80: 5.3
0-90: 6.4
0-100: 7.6
0-110: 9.3
0-120: 11.4
0-130: 13.8
0-140: 16.6
0-150: 20.8
Acceleration above 100miles/h shows the conceptual problem of the hybrid setup. It gets completely crashed by the G8x, which on paper has 160hp less!
 
Sport Auto France Supertest - Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

hyundai_ioniq_supertest.webp


Circuit Val de Vienne Lap Time - 1:49,81
Vmax: 231 km/h
Max Lateral G-Force: +1,1 / -1,1

Track Conditions: 19deg C - Dry

Driver: Christophe Tinseau

Acceleration (km/h):

0-100:
3,5
0-160: 7,3
0-200: 12,2

0-400m: 11,5s @ 196 km/h
0-1000m: 21,3s @ 237 km/h

Braking:

200-0: 147 m

Weight: 2247 kg
Weight Distribution: 49,6/50,4%

Tire Brand: Pirelli P Zero
Tire Size: 275/35/21

Rating: 5/5

Price as tested: 78,900 €
 
C&D Test of G60 BMW 540i xDrive

Tested: 2024 BMW 540i xDrive Plays the Dating Game

1725689134022.webp


Every new car is a pretty good first date. It's the second and third dates when annoyances start to reveal themselves. Add in some competition, and it becomes easier to separate the one you want to settle down with from the rest.

HIGHS: "I can't believe it's not a V-12" smoothness, luxury-car isolation, compact-car fuel economy

When the BMW 540i xDrive visited our office, we were charmed by its incredible inline-six, an engine free of harshness or bad vibes. It's strong too, with 375 horsepower giving the 4365-pound 540i the ability to leap to 60 mph in 4.0 seconds. The powerful six has a good mate in its eight-speed automatic partner. Gear-changes are smooth, and downshifts come quickly. There's a slickness to the entire powertrain, as if friction does not apply. It pays dividends in fuel economy, with the 3.0-liter returning 37 mpg in our 75-mph highway test.

1725689249064.webp


Sounds like love, right? Well, we were pretty smitten—until a 2024 Mercedes-Benz E450 rolled in like an attractive contestant number two. Next to the Benz, the 540i suddenly felt a size too big. There's a sense that there's less glass, and as a result, the cabin seems more confining. Drive the two back to back, and the BMW's reactions and feel-free steering make it seem heavier than the Benz, despite weighing 101 pounds less.

LOWS: Feels larger than it is, aloof handling, some steering feel would be nice.
Both have a supple ride, though the Benz's optional adaptive dampers can go softer than our BMW's electronically controlled units, making them more suitable to Michigan roads. The 540i takes corners with ease, but there's an aloofness to the handling, largely due to the steering, which is light on both effort and feedback.

Still, we're grateful for the turbocharged six. We also like the look and finish of the 540i's interior, although the digital gauges could be easier to read—the cluster offers different display options, all terrible—and the infotainment system's menus are daunting at first. The rear seats are adult-ready, and front-seat comfort is excellent. You'll be fidget-free for the duration of a tank of gas, which at 37 mpg will last 580 miles.

1725689441489.webp


Graced with charm and an engine so smooth that you'd think a V-12 might be under the hood, the 540i xDrive is more about luxury than sportiness. The 5-series used to be the mid-size sports sedan to beat, but the more dates we went on, the more it revealed itself to be less of a big 3-series and more of a smaller 7-series.

VERDICT: Let's keep it a situationship for now.
Specifications

2024 BMW 540i xDrive
Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $65,895/$83,595
Options: Executive package (remote engine start, heated steering wheel, sky lounge roof, glass controls), $4450; M Sport Package (21-inch Individual Aero Bicolor 95 wheels, Aluminum Rhombicile trim silver accents, M sport suspension, M steering wheel, Shadowline exterior trim, M Sport exterior elements, M Sport interior elements, M Sport content), $3000; Black/Atlas Gray Merino Leather, $2450; Driving Assistance Pro package (Active Driving Assistant Pro and Highway Assistant), $2000; Luxury Seating package (front ventilated seats, heated front and rear seats), $1350; M Sport Professional package, $1050; Bowers and Wilkins surround sound stereo, $950; Vegas Red Metallic paint, $650
ENGINE
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, port and direct fuel injection
Displacement: 183 in3, 2998 cm3
Power: 375 hp @ 6250 rpm
Torque: 398 lb-ft @ 1850 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 14.8-in vented disc/13.6-in vented disc
Tires: Continental EcoContact 6 Q
F: 245/35R-21 102Y Extra Load ★ MO
R: 275/30R-21 96Y Extra Load ★ MO
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 117.9 in
Length: 199.2 in
Width: 74.8 in
Height: 59.6 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 55/46 ft3
Trunk Volume: 18 ft3
Curb Weight: 4365 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
100 mph: 10.2 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.5 sec @ 111 mph
130 mph: 18.2 sec
150 mph: 26.8 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.8 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 152 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 163 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 328 ft
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 28 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 37 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 580 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 28/26/33 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED

Here is the E450 tested figures for comparison:

2024 Mercedes-Benz E450 4Matic
Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

PRICE
Base/As Tested: $69,150/$90,870
Options: Pinnacle trim (Burmester stereo, insulated glass, illuminated grille), $3400; Airmatic suspension (air springs, 4.5-degree rear steering), $3200; 21-inch wheels, $3050; Tonka Brown Nappa leather, $2990; Driver Assistance package (lane-keep assist, active steering assist, adaptive cruise control), $1950; Alpine Grey paint, $1750; MBUX Superscreen package (includes front passenger display and selfie camera), $1500; 3-D gauge cluster, $990; Digital Light package, $990; Leather package (ventilated front seats, leather instrument panel and beltline trim), $800; Winter package (heated steering wheel and windshield washer system), $450; additional USB ports, $300; Night package (black exterior trim), $200; Energizing Air Control, $150

ENGINE
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 183 in3, 2999 cm3
Power: 375 hp @ 6100 rpm
Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm

TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic

CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 14.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc/14.2-in vented disc
Tires: Continental EcoContact 6Q
F: 245/35R-21 96Y ★ MO
R: 275/30R-21 98Y ★ MO

DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 116.6 in
Length: 194.9 in
Width: 74.0 in
Height: 57.9 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 58/47 ft3
Trunk Volume: 13 ft3
Curb Weight: 4466 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.4 sec
100 mph: 10.9 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.0 sec @ 109 mph
120 mph: 15.9 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.6 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.5 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 129 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 159 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 327 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.93 g

C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 24 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 35 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 600 mi

EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 25/22/31 mpg
 
C&D Test of G60 BMW 540i xDrive

Tested: 2024 BMW 540i xDrive Plays the Dating Game

1725689134022.webp


Every new car is a pretty good first date. It's the second and third dates when annoyances start to reveal themselves. Add in some competition, and it becomes easier to separate the one you want to settle down with from the rest.

HIGHS: "I can't believe it's not a V-12" smoothness, luxury-car isolation, compact-car fuel economy

When the BMW 540i xDrive visited our office, we were charmed by its incredible inline-six, an engine free of harshness or bad vibes. It's strong too, with 375 horsepower giving the 4365-pound 540i the ability to leap to 60 mph in 4.0 seconds. The powerful six has a good mate in its eight-speed automatic partner. Gear-changes are smooth, and downshifts come quickly. There's a slickness to the entire powertrain, as if friction does not apply. It pays dividends in fuel economy, with the 3.0-liter returning 37 mpg in our 75-mph highway test.

1725689249064.webp


Sounds like love, right? Well, we were pretty smitten—until a 2024 Mercedes-Benz E450 rolled in like an attractive contestant number two. Next to the Benz, the 540i suddenly felt a size too big. There's a sense that there's less glass, and as a result, the cabin seems more confining. Drive the two back to back, and the BMW's reactions and feel-free steering make it seem heavier than the Benz, despite weighing 101 pounds less.

LOWS: Feels larger than it is, aloof handling, some steering feel would be nice.
Both have a supple ride, though the Benz's optional adaptive dampers can go softer than our BMW's electronically controlled units, making them more suitable to Michigan roads. The 540i takes corners with ease, but there's an aloofness to the handling, largely due to the steering, which is light on both effort and feedback.

Still, we're grateful for the turbocharged six. We also like the look and finish of the 540i's interior, although the digital gauges could be easier to read—the cluster offers different display options, all terrible—and the infotainment system's menus are daunting at first. The rear seats are adult-ready, and front-seat comfort is excellent. You'll be fidget-free for the duration of a tank of gas, which at 37 mpg will last 580 miles.

1725689441489.webp


Graced with charm and an engine so smooth that you'd think a V-12 might be under the hood, the 540i xDrive is more about luxury than sportiness. The 5-series used to be the mid-size sports sedan to beat, but the more dates we went on, the more it revealed itself to be less of a big 3-series and more of a smaller 7-series.

VERDICT: Let's keep it a situationship for now.
Specifications

2024 BMW 540i xDrive
Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $65,895/$83,595
Options: Executive package (remote engine start, heated steering wheel, sky lounge roof, glass controls), $4450; M Sport Package (21-inch Individual Aero Bicolor 95 wheels, Aluminum Rhombicile trim silver accents, M sport suspension, M steering wheel, Shadowline exterior trim, M Sport exterior elements, M Sport interior elements, M Sport content), $3000; Black/Atlas Gray Merino Leather, $2450; Driving Assistance Pro package (Active Driving Assistant Pro and Highway Assistant), $2000; Luxury Seating package (front ventilated seats, heated front and rear seats), $1350; M Sport Professional package, $1050; Bowers and Wilkins surround sound stereo, $950; Vegas Red Metallic paint, $650
ENGINE
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, port and direct fuel injection
Displacement: 183 in3, 2998 cm3
Power: 375 hp @ 6250 rpm
Torque: 398 lb-ft @ 1850 rpm
TRANSMISSION
8-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 14.8-in vented disc/13.6-in vented disc
Tires: Continental EcoContact 6 Q
F: 245/35R-21 102Y Extra Load ★ MO
R: 275/30R-21 96Y Extra Load ★ MO
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 117.9 in
Length: 199.2 in
Width: 74.8 in
Height: 59.6 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 55/46 ft3
Trunk Volume: 18 ft3
Curb Weight: 4365 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
100 mph: 10.2 sec
1/4-Mile: 12.5 sec @ 111 mph
130 mph: 18.2 sec
150 mph: 26.8 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.8 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 152 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 163 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 328 ft
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 28 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 37 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 580 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 28/26/33 mpg
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED

Here is the E450 tested figures for comparison:

2024 Mercedes-Benz E450 4Matic
Vehicle Type: front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

PRICE
Base/As Tested: $69,150/$90,870
Options: Pinnacle trim (Burmester stereo, insulated glass, illuminated grille), $3400; Airmatic suspension (air springs, 4.5-degree rear steering), $3200; 21-inch wheels, $3050; Tonka Brown Nappa leather, $2990; Driver Assistance package (lane-keep assist, active steering assist, adaptive cruise control), $1950; Alpine Grey paint, $1750; MBUX Superscreen package (includes front passenger display and selfie camera), $1500; 3-D gauge cluster, $990; Digital Light package, $990; Leather package (ventilated front seats, leather instrument panel and beltline trim), $800; Winter package (heated steering wheel and windshield washer system), $450; additional USB ports, $300; Night package (black exterior trim), $200; Energizing Air Control, $150

ENGINE
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve inline-6, aluminum block and head, direct fuel injection
Displacement: 183 in3, 2999 cm3
Power: 375 hp @ 6100 rpm
Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 1800 rpm

TRANSMISSION
9-speed automatic

CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 14.6-in vented, cross-drilled disc/14.2-in vented disc
Tires: Continental EcoContact 6Q
F: 245/35R-21 96Y ★ MO
R: 275/30R-21 98Y ★ MO

DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 116.6 in
Length: 194.9 in
Width: 74.0 in
Height: 57.9 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 58/47 ft3
Trunk Volume: 13 ft3
Curb Weight: 4466 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.4 sec
100 mph: 10.9 sec
1/4-Mile: 13.0 sec @ 109 mph
120 mph: 15.9 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 5.0 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.6 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 3.5 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 129 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 159 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 327 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.93 g

C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 24 mpg
75-mph Highway Driving: 35 mpg
75-mph Highway Range: 600 mi

EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 25/22/31 mpg

0-100MPH in 10 seconds just over is rapid. The kerb weight is also a big number. Thanks.
 
C&D Test - McLaren 750S

Hot Flashes: 2024 McLaren 750S Tested
We take a McLaren 750S for a run up a California canyon in a 115-degree swelter.

1725690507065.webp


We neglected to check the weather forecast before we headed to Nine Mile Canyon Road, roughly 160 miles northeast of Los Angeles. If we had, we would have seen abnormally high daily temps of 115 degrees. Hot enough to get some sauna-esque nostril burn when breathing it in.

It's not like McLaren's $333,040 750S, a thoroughly reworked and optimized 720S, needs any extra heat, because it's already packing plenty of its own. Its twin-turbo DOHC V-8 now makes 740 horsepower, 30 more than before, and most of the rear end of the car is metal mesh to let the excess heat from its 4.0-liter furnace escape without melting the exotic bodywork. In fact, the notch cut out of the center of the new, 20 percent larger rear wing is there because that section above the exhaust would otherwise be at risk of wilting.

1725690543433.webp


If that horsepower figure doesn't get your attention, first appreciate what exceptional times we're living in, and then consider the other side of the accelerative equation: weight. McLaren claims the 750S is 66 pounds lighter than the 720S—some of which is due to making lighter-weight content, such as carbon-fiber buckets, standard. Our car, at 3206 pounds, turned out to be 45 pounds heavier. Of course, optional equipment matters, and the roll bar and six-point harnesses in our car could have easily added that much back. Still, the 750S is lighter than just about anything else, including the svelte Porsche 911 GT3 RS. The Ferrari 296GTB may have 79 horsepower on the 750S, but it also weighs 326 pounds more. Lamborghini's new Revuelto and Temerario are also going hybrid, meaning they're certain to be substantially heavier. The Corvette has nearly breached the 4000-pound threshold with the electric-front-axle E-Ray. Pure, lightweight sports cars and supercars seem headed toward extinction.

HIGHS: Mega straight-line speed, lithe and lively moves, steering feel for days, shockingly supple ride.
Nine Mile Canyon is in Inyo County, which always makes us snicker as we consider ways to work it into some kind of "Who's on First" routine. As the road heads west into the Sierra Nevadas from CA-395, there are a couple of initial open sections where you can drink in the 750S's straight-line speed, a McLaren strength. In 18 years, we've run more than 300 vehicles at our Lightning Lap track test, and the peak-speed podium is all McLaren: 765LT, Senna, 720S. The 750S will be vying for one of those top spots—following a quick roasting of its rear tires to unlock the last skosh of launch traction, it performed an astonishing 2.3-second rip to 60 mph, 0.3 second quicker than the 720S, making it the quickest McLaren ever. It's impressively close to the all-wheel-drive crowd—see, weight matters—and ends the Ferrari 296GTB's short reign as the quickest rear-drive car we've ever tested. However, at the quarter-mile, the 296 narrowly retakes the acceleration lead, 9.7 seconds to 9.8.

1725690884662.webp


About three miles up the road, you'll see a pipe draped over the landscape that disappears clear into the side of the mountain. That's L.A.'s first aqueduct, which starts about 90 miles farther north, ferrying water solely by gravity a total of 233 miles, a monumental five-year effort completed in 1913 by thousands of laborers. Against the giant expanse, the 9.5-foot-diameter pipe looks unbelievably tiny.

1725690912027.webp


All this plumbing talk reminds us of McLaren's longtime approach of controlling body roll with diagonal hydraulic connections between the dampers rather than girthy anti-roll bars that ruin the ride. For this latest third-generation version, supplier Tenneco allowed McLaren more tuning latitude than before, including customizing the accumulators. Supercars typically have all the roll compliance of a rigid-axle tractor, but when the 750S hits a dip at low speed, and one side—both front and rear—can compress simultaneously to breathe over it with no head toss, continuing the 720S's fantastic revelation that a supercar need not ride like one.

The 750S is also a remarkably good highway cruiser. Sure, there's some impact harshness—the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R tires, the most aggressive of the three options, are likely worse than the others—and slight tramlining. But even so, the 750S is a substantial three decibels quieter at 70 mph than the 720S, making it not at all out of the question to listen to a podcast via newly available Apple CarPlay.

LOWS: Engine's shriek can't be heard from the cabin, ingress and egress become tiresome.
1725691029814.webp


Back to Nine Mile, where we're sluicing up the mountain. It's super dry now in the summer, but you can still spot thriving massive trees and surrounding greenery in valleys between two ridges that must be able to continue living off long-ago snowmelt from above. This is no pristine road; it's patchy, broken, uneven. It gets cooked in the summer, and up near Kennedy Meadows at 6427 feet, the road-edge markers are eight feet tall to keep from getting covered by as much as 100 inches of snow here in the winter. But the road's imperfections make it a perfect place to show off the 750S. We mostly keep the Handling setting in its gentlest Comfort mode, where the 750S dances over the challenging surface feeling lithe, alive, and tossable. Its steering ratio, borrowed from the 765LT, is marginally quicker than the 720S's, and the assist remains hydraulic, making McLaren one of the last electric-assist holdouts. The steering is immediate off center and alive with road texture, although, as before, the effort buildup as cornering forces increase remains less pronounced than we'd like. The simple Alcantara-covered wheel is thin by modern standards and free of buttons, with a paddle rocking behind it to knock out upshifts and downshifts. Everything about the car and driving experience is focused on the business of going quickly and paring weight. But, when the adults weren't looking, someone slipped in a new 12-color ambient-lighting option.

1725691073287.webp



The brakes have a slight initial dead zone, and then the pedal goes firm and you modulate with pressure more than travel; that part we love. It takes a lot of leg to get the tires to the threshold of adhesion, but once you do, the stopping distances—mostly thanks to the grippier tires—are much improved: 136 feet from 70 mph. Our car has the track-brake upgrade, an $18,050 add-on for Brembo carbon-ceramic rotors similar to the Senna's that replace standard carbon-ceramics [see "Biased Brakes," below]. Why do they cost almost as much as a Chevy Trax? Because the production process takes seven months.

This road is not a regular place to spot a supercar, as evidenced by the long stares from the rare passersby, many of whom are piloting some kind of extreme wilderness-camping rig. Even dusty corners with tires scrabbling for traction don't cause calamity. Once the Trofeo Rs reach optimal operating temps—not a problem during this heat wave—they stick remarkably well. On the skidpad, the 750S's 1.13-g result bests the 720S's 1.10 g's. It takes a lot of effort to get the stability-control light to blink, and even with the system fully disabled, the high limits aren't abrupt, and balance—or a sensational slide—is just a dab of power away. But before the tires are up to temp, wheelspin is possible at just about any speed.

During an exhilarating drive, you can't help but notice the active rear wing dancing in the rearview mirror. It tucks down when accelerating, then pivots up to act as an air brake when slowing. At a glance, the 750S's organic shape doesn't appear as overtly influenced by aerodynamics as many competitors'. But channels running through the doors and draped over the back end get the air to do the car's bidding. Although the outside temperature was extremely high, it nonetheless seemed too easy to get the 750S's coolant temperature above 230 degrees and trigger a warning, although it always quickly subsided after a brief cooldown period. We also had an issue where the engine went into limp mode and lost boost. McLaren suspects a combination of possible bad fuel and lots of heat soak—the problem eventually resolved itself.After stopping to check out Chimney Peak, the highest in the area at roughly 8000 feet—hey, it's only 95 degrees up here—we sized up our re-entry into the severe carbon-fiber buckets from the Senna, a $7600 option. Their outer edge is roughly in line with the sill of the carbon-fiber tub, so sliding in isn't as difficult as expected. It's still somewhat of an awkward clamber to get feet and legs over and into the right place, but in the end, this 99th-percentile male fits just fine, the intense thigh and shoulder bolstering not impinging on hours-long comfort. There's sufficient headroom too. However, adjustable lumbar support is bring-your-own, and we kept wishing we had every time we spent an hour or more behind the wheel.

1725691155791.webp


The Sequoia National Forest lies ahead, but its roads are better for sightseeing than exercising a supercar, so we head back down. From behind the 750S, you'll see the 720S's twin exhaust pipes pushed together in a central outlet and now pointing more skyward. There are two exhaust tunes; the more lenient U.S. market gets the louder one with no active valves. From the outside, the high-pitched shriek as the V-8 pulls to its 8250-rpm redline, punctuated by mule-kick-decisive shifts from the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic, is the stuff of dreams. Unfortunately, that exotic wail doesn't make it to the driver's ear. You hear more of a roar, which is certainly invigorating and much improved—engine sound is no longer the weak point it was on the 720S. But you'll never forget there's a pair of turbochargers present because you'll hear more high-pitched whistling in the cabin than in Florida during hurricane season. You'll want to keep the revs up, not only for audible or visceral rewards but also because the torque peak—590 pound-feet—is high at 5500 rpm. Much below that, you can find significant turbo lag.

This latest 750S proves once again that the driving prowess of the 700-series McLaren is every bit as high as the mountains behind us. As we switch off the car one last time, we spot a familiar McLaren feature, one so supercar appropriate that we can't believe it hasn't been mimicked: a display showing how many days the battery can last before it needs a trickle charge or the engine to run. Although who in their right mind would choose to wait 29 days before having this experience again?

1725691241432.webp


VERDICT: Less weight is better than more power.
Biased Brakes
Carbon-ceramic, or CCM, rotors are made from chopped fibers oriented randomly, whereas the more extreme Brembo CCM-R rotors that are part of the 750S's $18,050 track-brake upgrade use patches of long fibers stitched together to form a specific 3-D design that's cured at extreme temperatures for a much longer time. A similar process is used to create the carbon-carbon rotors used in the highest forms of racing. The long fibers in the CCM-R discs are responsible for thermal conductivity that's four times higher and strength that's 60 percent greater. Their lower operating temperature leads to better fade resistance and roughly three-times-longer life on track.

1725691297845.webp


Counterpoints
The best part about driving the McLaren 750S is stopping. That's a tiny dis on its comfort—I would take the weight penalty for the comfort seats over the Senna-sourced race buckets—but mostly it's a rave for the optional track brakes, which bring the thing to a halt with a hit like the apogee of a bungee jump. Thrilling, and also lifesaving, at least for a family of California quail that chose the exact moment I came around a corner to begin crossing the road. You'd think they would have been forewarned by the hawk scream of the McLaren's V-8, but there they were, bobbing across, button-cute and in mortal peril. The 750S tower buzz turned their question-mark head feathers to exclamation points, but they toddled off unharmed, leaving me with only open road ahead. Let me start over here—the best part about driving a McLaren 750S is open road ahead. —Elana Scherr

You think the McLaren 750S rocketing to 60 mph in 2.3 seconds isn't a big deal? After all, the Lucid Air Sapphire will do it in 2.1 seconds. Well, think again. On its own, a 60-mph time is an increasingly brainless metric in this electrified age. So let's bring in stopping from 100 mph (264 feet versus 303 for the Sapphire) and cornering at the limit (1.13 g's versus 1.04), benefits that come with over a ton less weight. And that's just the start. This McLaren tickles apexes and skims over FIA curbs like it owns the place, and its reconfigured exhaust howls and spits in a way that brings you a step closer to God. And yet, when you're just puttering around, the 750S obliges with a sedate ride that will fool the average Sapphire owner. All of this melds together in one glorious package. I want this car. No, I need this car. But I can't afford this car. Sh*t!

Specifications

2024 McLaren 750S
Vehicle Type: mid-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door coupe
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $333,040/$449,790
Options: track-brake upgrade, $18,050; carbon-fiber exterior trim, $10,200; Ludus Blue paint, $9900; 750S performance interior, $9400; carbon-fiber front fenders and louvers, $8750; carbon-fiber interior trim, $8750; carbon-fiber seats, $7600; titanium harness bar, $6150; double-glazed engine window, $6050; Bowers & Wilkins stereo, $5400; 360-degree park assist, $4000; Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R tires, $3850; carbon-fiber sill trim, $3300; carbon-fiber headlight trim, $3050; red brake calipers, $2200; Stealth ultra-lightweight wheels, $2000; six-point harnesses, $1750; Stealth exhaust finisher, $1750; titanium locking wheel bolts, $1700; Bright Red contrast stitching, $850; Carbon Black Alcantara steering wheel, $650; volumetric alarm, $500; Homelink system, $400; fire extinguisher, $300; warning triangle and first-aid kit, $200
ENGINE
twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection
Displacement: 244 in3, 3994 cm3
Power: 740 hp @ 7500 rpm
Torque: 590 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
TRANSMISSION
7-speed dual-clutch automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/control arms
Brakes, F/R: 15.4-in vented, cross-drilled carbon-ceramic disc/15.0-in vented, cross-drilled, carbon-ceramic disc
Tires: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo
F: 245/35ZR-19 (93Y) MC1
R: 305/30ZR-20 (103Y) MC1
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 105.1 in
Length: 179.9 in
Width: 76.0 in
Height: 47.1 in
Passenger Volume: 47 ft3
Cargo Volume: 7 ft3
Curb Weight: 3206 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 2.3 sec
100 mph: 4.8 sec
130 mph: 7.7 sec
1/4-Mile: 9.8 sec @ 145 mph
150 mph: 10.7 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 3.3 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 2.4 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 2.3 sec
Top Speed (mfr claim): 206 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 136 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 264 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 1.13 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 12 mpg
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 17/15/19 mpg
 
So without the idiotic rollout-BS it's basically:
0-100 km/h: 2,7 s
0-160 km/h: 4,9 s
Quarter mile: 10,0 s (233 km/h) :)

It’s extremely quick but rollout does make some sense. I don’t have an issue either way.

What’s always more remarkable to me is how rollout of 1 ft takes as long as it does.
 
McLaren 750S 1st test in Sport Auto:

Hockenheimring GP in 1:47,5 min, so 2 seconds slower than 720S on the same tyres (Trofeo R), but also with a different driver.
More power and shorter final drive makes it trickier at the limit, also 0-200 km/h in 8,0 sec is only 0.1 s quicker than the 720S Track Pack and 0.4 s slower than the Supertest-720S. :(

1726111485159.jpg
 
McLaren 750S 1st test in Sport Auto:

Hockenheimring GP in 1:47,5 min, so 2 seconds slower than 720S on the same tyres (Trofeo R), but also with a different driver.
More power and shorter final drive makes it trickier at the limit, also 0-200 km/h in 8,0 sec is only 0.1 s quicker than the 720S Track Pack and 0.4 s slower than the Supertest-720S. :(

1726111485159.webp
Quite the opposite what happend in the last Auto Bild Sportscars where it was almost 2 seconds faster on Sachsenring.
 

Thread statistics

Created
Soup,
Last reply from
bmwz4coupe,
Replies
1,547
Views
135,052

Trending content


Back
Top