Which is predominantly visible in the roofline which extends longer on the NA0 while G50 indeed mirrors that of the G20.
NA0 has a shorter dash to axle ratio so most likely, yes.And the shorter hood. Or am I imagining things?
NA0 has a shorter dash to axle ratio so most likely, yes.
The NA0 presents a more "cabin in the middle" than "cabin back" silhouette. In a sense, a subtle revisit of a sedan theme common 40-50 years ago. Revisiting the E12/E28 5ers so to speak.
Cab-backward FTW!Correct. I am having a hard time deciding what I like more, NA0 or G50. Sometimes it's the one, sometimes the other.
Cab-backward FTW!![]()
I agree - it's looking very appealing from a proportions perspective.But this compactness has something too. I really dig it.
Mine is the G50 > NA0.Until now I used to doubt between the G50 and the NA1. But lately I have settled on the i3. Proportions are just better IMO.
This looks very nice too.
Agree. After some time to think about it, I much prefer the proportions of the NA0.I much prefer what I am seeing in the form of the NA0 i3 sedan:
![]()
So good in fact, that I am hoping that the essences of this design eventually migrate upwards into the future 5 and 7 series sedans. And so what should some naysayers exclaim "Russian Dolls !!" ? This design promises to feature a potential of genuine timelessness that can only benefit BMW as a brand. IMHO, it is REALLY THAT GOOD.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.