Snake Vargas
Oversteer Expert
I suppose each type of engine layout has its own benefits, so I'm not such a fan over any other. Inline engines can be smooth (well, inline 4 engines sometimes aren't), boxer engines have all the benefits as Martin said
, the V layout is good for space efficiency and reasonably simple construction, the W layout is more space efficient WRT (with respect to) number of cylinders and therefore swept capacity, but it does restrict the angle of the banks and also makes the block somewhat complex to engineer, and rotary engines are small and do have a low centre of gravity like the boxer engines.
I suppose I'm a fan of the boxer for the reason of engineering elegance - use the engine's own reciprocating mass to cancel out vibrations, and on the same plane so that it is most effective. That's just smart. Low centre of gravity etc. are just icing on the cake.
That said, I can understand why not many cars use the engine. It does make packaging difficult. So, my "everyman's choice" would be the V-layout. Compact and simple, efficient space WRT capacity.
I suppose I'm a fan of the boxer for the reason of engineering elegance - use the engine's own reciprocating mass to cancel out vibrations, and on the same plane so that it is most effective. That's just smart. Low centre of gravity etc. are just icing on the cake.
That said, I can understand why not many cars use the engine. It does make packaging difficult. So, my "everyman's choice" would be the V-layout. Compact and simple, efficient space WRT capacity.