SF90 [Official] All-new Ferrari SF90 Stradale

[slicknick]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Jo_Sta7]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

More data putting the QR test in question. This guy achieves 2.57s 0-100km/h. So we've now had 3 other 0-100 measurements:

Drag Times: 2.45s
Carwow: 2.53s
Daniel Abt: 2.57s

Yet QR somehow gets 2.19s ...

You’re forgetting that Drag Times and I believe Carwow times 0-60, not 0-62. QRs 0-60 would be 2.1 seconds.

I think the answer is fairly simple. QR utilizes 1 ft rollout in their times. This car simply cannot do a 0-60 mph below 2.3 seconds without rollout. At least not on a non-prepped surface. Brooks times, and my friends who own the car, line up pretty well with QR if you factor in rollout which is typically around .18 seconds.

 

[Bridster]

You’re forgetting that Drag Times and I believe Carwow times 0-60, not 0-62. QRs 0-60 would be 2.1 seconds.

I think the answer is fairly simple. QR utilizes 1 ft rollout in their times. This car simply cannot do a 0-60 mph below 2.3 seconds without rollout. At least not on a non-prepped surface. Brooks times, and my friends who own the car, line up pretty well with QR if you factor in rollout which is typically around .18 seconds.

I converted the 0-60 times to 0-62. The difference in 0-60 and 0-62 is pretty much exactly 0.1s, possibly 0.9s in really fast cars. QR has never used roll-out as far as I know. If they did it in case of the SF90 (which I doubt), they certainly failed to mention that detail.

 

[Jo_Sta7]

I converted the 0-60 times to 0-62. The difference in 0-60 and 0-62 is pretty much exactly 0.1s, possibly 0.9s in really fast cars. QR has never used roll-out as far as I know. If they did it in case of the SF90 (which I doubt), they certainly failed to mention that detail.

I've looked through enough of their testing data, combined with my own from real world cars to conclude they absolutely use rollout in their calcs. Take, for example, the Mclaren 720S test achieving 100 kph in 2.7 seconds. That's 2.6 seconds to 60 mph with no rollout and 2.4 seconds with (as would be reported in a magazine). On a non-prepped runway. It's just not possible.

Their SF90 would be achieving 1.9 seconds to 60 mph with rollout. Again, not happening.

 

[WBarnes]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[dalab]

This tense situation with a dubious outcome was filmed in São Paulo and immediately spread like wildfire on social media, going viral.

NOTEWORTHYEXOTICS on Instagram: "Ferrari SF90 Falls Off Truck 🤦‍♂️ Follow @noteworthyexotics for more! Video via: @rpo3"

6,070 likes, 151 comments - noteworthyexotics on August 12, 2021: "Ferrari SF90 Falls Off Truck 🤦‍♂️ Follow @noteworthyexotics for more! Video via: @rpo3".

www.instagram.com

Cómo no bajar un Ferrari SF90 Stradale de cerca de medio millón de euros de un camión, en vídeo

Quien avisa no es traidor y nos sentimos en la obligación de alertar que este vídeo no es apto para amantes de los superdeportivos. Quienes a pesar de todo...

www.motorpasion.com

 

[J.E]

Bianco Italia.

@brasilvipcars

 

[DeDe]

I've looked through enough of their testing data, combined with my own from real world cars to conclude they absolutely use rollout in their calcs. Take, for example, the Mclaren 720S test achieving 100 kph in 2.7 seconds. That's 2.6 seconds to 60 mph with no rollout and 2.4 seconds with (as would be reported in a magazine). On a non-prepped runway. It's just not possible.

Their SF90 would be achieving 1.9 seconds to 60 mph with rollout. Again, not happening.

AutoBild Sportscars also managed 2.7 seconds, Autozeitung was even faster with 2.6 s for the 720S. None of these two are using rollout. Even AMuS managed 2.8 s with two people onboard.

 

[mihc]

 

[m-ch]

An other customer Sf90 underperforming..
100-200kmh in around 5.2-5.5. only downill run in 4.8sec. Ferrari is claiming 4.2sec

times at 16:50 and 39:50 (qualifying mode)

 

[Jo_Sta7]

For context, my best 100-200 in my turbo S is 5.65. Best in the 765 LT is 3.99.

 

[Dilusha]

An other customer Sf90 underperforming..
100-200kmh in around 5.2-5.5. only downill run in 4.8sec. Ferrari is claiming 4.2sec

It didn't underperform. Batteries were low.

 

[m-ch]

It didn't underperform. Batteries were low.

Batteries were 50%. That should be enough for 2-3 100-200kph run.And if you go that much downhill like on the last run, and you are still of the factory time by 0.6 sec (4.8 vs 4.2)…
On a race track in quali mode, you are a lot of time around 50% or even lower. The elec power is about 22% of the system output and the charging level of 50% of the battery does not affect the acceleration by - 1.1 sec from 100-200kph..
As Novitec says in there videos, the sf90 is quick of the line, but once in third gear, the car isnt pulling as much as for comparisson a 765 lt does

Dragtimes will come up soon with his Sf90, so more infos to come

 

[Dilusha]

Batteries were 50%. That should be enough for 2-3 100-200kph run.And if you go that much downhill like on the last run, and you are still of the factory time by 0.6 sec (4.8 vs 4.2)…
On a race track in quali mode, you are a lot of time around 50% or even lower. The elec power is about 22% of the system output and the charging level of 50% of the battery does not affect the acceleration by - 1.1 sec from 100-200kph..
As Novitec says in there videos, the sf90 is quick of the line, but once in third gear, the car isnt pulling as much as for comparisson a 765 lt does

Dragtimes will come up soon with his Sf90, so more infos to come

I don't know much German, so it's very difficult to understand anything in that video. Where can I see the batteries at 50%? Could you point that out to me please?

 

[m-ch]

that was said by JP. At the beginning they couldnt run in elec mode, as battery was to low, system didnt allowed it, so them they carged to about 50% and maid there runs im quali mode.
What i am wondering, what does the manuel say, how many battery % / km range is needed to have the 220 elec Hp, i guess there is nothing written about this situation

 

[CrunchSlaughtered]

I don't know much German, so it's very difficult to understand anything in that video. Where can I see the batteries at 50%? Could you point that out to me please?

Jean Pierr (JP)is a really, really competent car guy. I doubt he hasn't done what is correct for a quick acceleration.

 

[Dilusha]

that was said by JP. At the beginning they couldnt run in elec mode, as battery was to low, system didnt allowed it, so them they carged to about 50% and maid there runs im quali mode.
What i am wondering, what does the manuel say, how many battery % / km range is needed to have the 220 elec Hp, i guess there is nothing written about this situation

It's all very confusing. At around 12:00 minute mark, you can see on the dash it's saying 2 km left on batteries. What does that mean?

 

[m-ch]

yes they couldnt engage elec mod du to low bat, then they recharged it and the elec mod engage automaticly. The system prevents to empty the batterie to 0%

 

[Dilusha]

yes they couldnt engage elec mod du to low bat, then they recharged it and the elec mod engage automaticly. The system prevents to empty the batterie to 0%

Yeah, I think it needs more charge to do 100-200 faster. But few months ago Sanjay in his own SF90S AF did 100-200 in 4.27 seconds with Brooks in John's 765LT. But again the conditions weren't all that great.

 

[WBarnes]

It didn't underperform. Batteries were low.

The joys of electric motoring. It's nice to know that my Gtech lawnmower is not on its own. They should form a support group for them.