you mean the members of GermanCarForumWell that's according to the testers demands but someone else might have a different set of demands and come to a different conclusion.
Well, if you put it that way, the C Class probably isn't "non-sporty", it is just less sporty than the Bimmer. Also, C Class can have adaptive chassis as well? Also, I think the C Class runs on run-flat tires as well?Problem is though. F30 isn't an uncomfortable car. Just because the new C-class is slightly more comfortable doesn't mean the F30 is uncomfortable ride. Besides what I read, the new C-class has worse seat space in the back (mainly for the head) than both A4 and 3-serie. F30 isn't available with Airmatic but there is adaptive chassi. Only error with F30 are those run flats which could affect the ride slightly. Just read every single review regarding F30, the ride is more comfortable than ever but less sporty.
Completely agree with you or everyone would buy a 3 series ,which is not the case. I do like the fact that Mercedes are playing this c class through their strengths and not trying to chase BMW , which itself isnt as sporty as it used to be. Whether making this c class generation more luxurious and comfortable than sporty will translate to it being considered a 'benchmark' in its segment remains to be seenWell that's according to the testers demands but someone else might have a different set of demands and come to a different conclusion.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2015-mercedes-benz-c400-4matic?src=soc_fcbks
"the 3 Series’s best materials can’t compare to the worst in this car. Wow"
somehow im very sceptical of this![]()
However, there is one thing that bothers me in the AutoBild test: the 3 has the M Sport pack. The Merc is an Avantgarde one, and the A4 is not S-Line. That is a bit unfair, because real competitors would be: Avantgarde vs. Sport; Exclusive vs Luxury; and AMG vs M Sport. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the AMG has bit sportier suspension setting than the regular C Classes?
Anyways, even if it was AMG in this test, I think the 3 would still be the sportier one (as it should). But the question is, who would be the overall winner.
http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-reviews/first-drives/2015-mercedes-benz-c400-4matic?src=soc_fcbks
"the 3 Series’s best materials can’t compare to the worst in this car. Wow"
somehow im very sceptical of this![]()
Well, if you put it that way, the C Class probably isn't "non-sporty", it is just less sporty than the Bimmer.
But i cant imagine how materials can be very different from one to another, they are still in the same class and price range, from similar car makers industry position wise. Different styles yes, but material wise i could only see marginal differenceWell I sat in the same interior spec (AMG line with red leather) and it felt like 100+K EUR car. For me the best interior of any Merc (including S-class) or even any car I sat/drove in. Simply perfect. Photos don´t do the justice.
Finally, I think sometimes we also forget that in the Chinese market they don't drive. The buyers of these cars get driven around. And as if so often the case now, this market plays a huge part in determining a models success, if not determining the class leader in sales entirely.
People in China get driven around in C-class? For real?
I dont believe the hype that c class is a lot more comfy than 3 series, or 3 a lot more sportier than C. Well it might be the case to us, but most customers wount be able to tell the difference. Most of the buy it by looks, brand image and general reception.I guarantee you the C-class will eat the 3-series up in Australian testing and in sales.
And i'm pretty confident that MB will narrow the gap with the 3-series even more this generation on a global level. There's a reason why the the 3-series has been made more comfortable than previously. As even older buyers continue to downsize, this is what they are demanding in these smaller models. The handling of the C will satisfy 75% of buyers and the interior presentation and ride quality will seal the deal for them.
Finally, I think sometimes we also forget that in the Chinese market they don't drive. The buyers of these cars get driven around. And as if so often the case now, this market plays a huge part in determining a models success, if not determining the class leader in sales entirely.
I dont believe the hype that c class is a lot more comfy than 3 series, or 3 a lot more sportier than C. Well it might be the case to us, but most customers wount be able to tell the difference. Most of the buy it by looks, brand image and general reception.
No neither. I believe they probably both play both disciplines very well. Ultimately itss a question of do you want your car a little sportier or a little more comfortable. Also design appeal will play a big part in what you choose.
I'm pretty confident that the balance MB has with the C-class will ensure victory over the 3-series for our market. The W204 has outsold the E90 and F30 every since it's launch. The w205 just builds on the W204.
I also believe the interior presentation of the C will play hugely on the minds of Chinese buyers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.