Vs Motortend: Rolls-Royce Ghost vs Bentley CFS Speed vs Aston Martin Rapide


Which one for you?

  • Aston Martin Rapide

    Votes: 25 34.2%
  • Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed

    Votes: 7 9.6%
  • Rolls Royce Ghost

    Votes: 41 56.2%

  • Total voters
    73
  • Poll closed .

ree

Kraftwagen König
Messages
10,837
629d304544810e90f651915f9085ae5d.webp


On one level, this is a completely pointless comparison. You see, the folks with the Benjamins to splurge on the $308,350 Rolls-Royce Ghost we show here, or the $226,485 Bentley Continental Flying Spur Speed and $209,500 Aston Martin Rapide that accompany it, are unlikely to sweat the mundane details the rest of us do when choosing between a Ford or a Chevy, or a Honda or a Toyota. Stuff like gas mileage and resale values and whether one might be a couple tenths quicker to 60 than the other are mostly irrelevant.
Even the price difference between the Rolls and the Aston -- money that will buy you a house in many parts of America -- is of little consequence. The people who buy these things usually own six or seven other cars; opening their garage doors is like opening a closet: "Hmmm...it's nice and sunny. Think I'll take the Lamborghini convertible today."

Yet it's an intriguing matchup, all the same. All three cars are uber-luxury four doors powered by 12-cylinder engines of roughly 6.0 liters or more. All three wear aristocratic nameplates and carefully trade on their storied pasts to command price tags that defy logic and common sense. All three ooze "Rule Britannia" to their bootstraps, yet were designed and developed by engineering teams headed by...Germans. The links that bind these three cars together are deeper and more profound than the differences that divide them.
The Ghost is the first small Rolls-Royce launched since the 1949 Silver Dawn, though "small" is a relative term: at 212.6 inches, it's still 4.3 inches longer overall than the not insubstantial Bentley CFS Speed and boasts a 9.0-inch-longer wheelbase. The Ghost is an imperiously elegant car: restrained and tasteful, but with a powerful presence on the road. The front axle is pushed forward and the cabin set back, delivering perfect proportions, and it has the high-nose, low-tail stance characteristic of classic British luxury cars. The Ghost sweeps around a circular driveway like a Riva Aquarama carving graceful turns on Lake Como.

The Ghost dwarfs the Aston Martin Rapide, though at 197.6 inches long, and with a 117.7-inch wheelbase, the Aston is still bigger than a Cadillac STS. The lithe, sensuous, impossibly gorgeous Rapide is a near-perfect replica of the concept that all but stole the 2006 Detroit show, and the way the DB9 coupe's curves have been artfully tugged and teased over a longer wheelbase and around four doors is truly breathtaking. Car-savvy Angelinos nearly drove off the road while vying for a closer look every time we hit the freeway.

Next to the Ghost and the Rapide, the CFS Speed looks a little frumpy. It's partly familiarity, as the Continental Flying Spur has been on the road almost five years, and parts of L.A. are awash with the things. But equally, there's no disguising the VW Group architecture on which it's built. If the superbly articulated Rolls-Royce Ghost has the quintessential British luxury-car design vocabulary just right, the Bentley, with its stubby hood and short front fenders, plus its long cabin and slightly odd C-pillar, has it all wrong. In terms of proportion and stance, it looks more middle European than resolutely British.
That's not to say we don't like it, however. Any company that names its performance models Speed is just fine by us, especially when it's not just marketing hype. With its 6.0-liter, twin-turbo W-12 engine tuned to deliver 48 more horses and 74 pound-feet than the regular Continental Flying Spur (it also gets retuned suspension, and Pirelli PZero tires on 20-inch rims), the CFS Speed is a leather-lined, ground-based intercontinental ballistic missile that will hit a genuine 200 mph on the autobahn without breaking a sweat. Even the Aston Martin will reach only 188 mph, while the Rolls is restricted to a dignified 155.

But while the 600-horse Bentley's sheer, um, speed is astonishing, its herculean powertrain is not the best of this bunch. That honor goes to the Ghost's 563-horsepower, 6.6-liter, direct-injection, twin-turbo V-12, which drives the rear wheels through the only eight-speed automatic transmission in this trio. With 575 pound-feet of torque on tap at just 1500 rpm -- 22 pound-feet more than the Bentley, available 200 rpm sooner -- and better gearing, the BMW-developed engine delivers satiny Saturn V thrust the moment you caress the gas pedal. This 5381-pound limo will accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds, a tenth slower than the 101-pound-heavier AWD Bentley, but obliterates that deficit over the quarter mile, crossing the line two-tenths sooner than the CFS and carrying 6 mph more speed. We're talking 12.7 seconds at 112.9 mph with little more than a polite murmur from under the hood.…


2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost vs 2010 Bentley CFS Speed vs 2010 Aston Martin Rapide Comparison - Motor Trend


2575f603af252bce755cc5f2f3d0f269.webp


6d662965df20378e94c9ba2003ae5e51.webp


e3f2072e836087590581aa22139f46a3.webp


a379548b5f21ac063143d440d200453c.webp


a5ffba874fdc2e989956855ee044fdb8.webp


08686098abe1c72a9e8862f71bc53460.webp


be9001732ff48cfec68143b8e35aa24e.webp


ce4368cc23abf3e77b14cb9209fb66ea.webp


351571bc8af129646e7b4fb49a6477ce.webp


b3e4b547508adb5bb6de4cf9188f90f0.webp


60cf5729e0c1962b58dd7899c2687a11.webp


233ff715cfb61bae07a5e02488b02884.webp


1adb8ced268b38409e839b64885351d8.webp


bd12ed0d868b52140fcc7efa6d587845.webp


fc5f44f030b60dbfcd0d030f732eb5b3.webp


77debe807bd424f94abfb477f3fec8c2.webp


:t-cheers:
 
It will ALWAYS be Rolls for me;)

Love the Rapide's rear seats:usa7uh:
 
Last week, I saw the Rapide for the first time at an exclusive dealership here in my country. (Kroymans, if it says anything to anyone here. They are an Aston/JaguarFerrari dealer, and they had a 599 GTO on display as well, my mind was blown). It actually is a very beautiful machine!
The Rolls I have yet to see IRL, but I think it looks brilliant in pics.

The Bentley is just horrible all around. The interior looks decent though.
 
Aston, Rolls, Bentley for me in that order.

M
 
Red on red for the Ghost. I love the Ghost, but not the 80's Oldsmobile color scheme.
 
The Ghost's side profile looks fantastic:

be9001732ff48cfec68143b8e35aa24e.webp


But I can't ignore that the Rapide's interior looks so grear, sporty and luxurious at the same time!
 
Thank You MotorTrend for comparing the Ghost to the proper Bentley! About time someone had some common sense!

Lol...I still have no clue why the Aston is there though.

Over all...I would go with the Bentley. The Aston....I'd rather buy the CLS. More room and cheaper price. The Rolls...If I were to get one I'd rather the Phantom.
 
Rapide. Sporty, subtle and discreet.

The other two are a bit too gaudy for everyday errands.
 
Dont like any of these cars..

Aston.. Looks like all other astons..
Bentley.. Looks like a frog
RR.. Looks like a mini phanthom and boring..
 
Thank You MotorTrend for comparing the Ghost to the proper Bentley! About time someone had some common sense!


Well, if you think the Ghost and Bentley are in the same class, you're making a huge mistake. The Rolls costs a whopping $100,000 more than the Bentley. And in the good old US of A, $100,000 for a car makes all the difference in the world, because cars are dirt cheap over there.
In fact, for $100,000, you can buy a decent house in most places in the USA. So bottom line: the Bentley is a cheap wannabe. A VW that costs way too much.
 
Rolls Royce for me in this comparison... If i were to get an Aston Martin (and I would love one), it'd be a black DBS with a red interior. Bentley has never done it for me in the Continental range.
 

Attachments

Well, if you think the Ghost and Bentley are in the same class, you're making a huge mistake. The Rolls costs a whopping $100,000 more than the Bentley. And in the good old US of A, $100,000 for a car makes all the difference in the world, because cars are dirt cheap over there.

In fact, for $100,000, you can buy a decent house in most places in the USA. So bottom line: the Bentley is a cheap wannabe. A VW that costs way too much.

Yes, you have a right to express your opinion and I respect that. Unfortunately, I still disagree. The Ghost should be compared with the Bentley FS and I totally respect MotorTrend (and Road & Track) for doing just that!
 
I'll have the Aston. I actually prefer it over its coupé siblings, which, coincidentally, is also true of my second choice, the Bentley. The Bentley actually looks rather good in darker colours. I don't care for the gaudy Rolls at all.
 
First off, the Bentley is absolutely hideous, in that I thought it looked dated the day it came out, and never commanded the look or presence of a car anywhere near its price-range.

It'd be between the Rolls or Aston for me. I'd probably go Rolls simply due to me being more "Luxury>Sport" oriented when it comes to Sedans, and the Rolls has that stately look and uber-coddling interior more-so.

Though, I think both of them are fabulous, I wouldn't kick either out of bed.
 
The Rolls is stunning!
I would choose the ghost, but with another colour.
Of course the Aston looks 1000 times more sporty and maybe more sexy than the others, but i just begun to enjoy the other way of driving... With a Rolls specs (oh yes, specs, the most beloved thing in this forum :D) are not important. You don´t care for the seconds, you just know that you will reach the 100 and the top speed is fast, thats all.
 
The Rolls is stunning!
I would choose the ghost, but with another colour.
Of course the Aston looks 1000 times more sporty and maybe more sexy than the others, but i just begun to enjoy the other way of driving... With a Rolls specs (oh yes, specs, the most beloved thing in this forum :D) are not important. You don´t care for the seconds, you just know that you will reach the 100 and the top speed is fast, thats all.

As EnI used to say, with Rolls, it's about how you arrive somewhere, not about how you go :D
 
Back
Top