Videos Mercedes E63 Estate vs. Audi R8


very very fast estate:bowdown:

Hate it tho when that guy says at the end "Finally caught up", seriously on a track the R8 would most prob be quicker:usa7uh::t-cheers:
 
Nothing surprising... The RS6 Avant would kill both of these.
R8 is not a straight-race car. We all know that. It's when the road turns, that it performs!

Nevertheless I would like to get one of these Wagons!! Probably would prefer the AMG over the Audi, because I'm fan of the E-Class design. :bowdown: But you all know me…give me the Sedan version, and I would be the happiest man alive…pure elegance in combination with speed, power and comfort… :usa7uh:
 
I've driven the E63 and yes its fast in straightline but not a very entertaining car. I haven't tried the R8 but its a real sportscars so it should be an very involving car to drive. If I want a fast straightliner give me a tuned Toyota Supra :D
 
MIghty mighty wagon:)


Indeed!

Whats amazing about the E63 Estate is that it`s faster than E63 sedan because of the slight rear weight bias I believe.

It`s even faster than the CLK63 BS, faster than the SL63 without the LC on.

I think I remember one test where the E63 Estate beat the M5 Estate on the track not too long ago....


If the next E-Estate gets 570hp from what the predictions are saying, it will be one of the fastest cars out there!!
 
Indeed!

Whats amazing about the E63 Estate is that it`s faster than E63 sedan because of the slight rear weight bias I believe.

It`s even faster than the CLK63 BS, faster than the SL65 without the LC on.

I think I remember one test where the E63 Estate beat the M5 Estate on the track not too long ago....

on our m5board.com meetings the E63 havent been close to the SL65. I think we also had a test between E63 and normal CLK63 and the E63 lost. We also had test were the E55 beat the E63.
 
What's the 0-100, 0-200, 0-300 figures on RS6 Avant vs E63 W?

I dont think there been a direct head to head comparison yet. Its pointless to compare times with another test done at a different time. There are different factors involved when meassuring acceleration.
 
I think I remember one test where the E63 Estate beat the M5 Estate on the track not too long ago....

Really? That's the first time I hear about it. Can you find it and post it here?
 
Really? That's the first time I hear about it. Can you find it and post it here?

I can confirm its true. I think it was the german Autobild with a grouptest with different Estate cars involved. The M5 T had the worst laptime of all the tested cars. Something must been wrong since there are many other tracktimes where the M5 been faster than the E63. But I guess sometimes there are exceptions :)

German Autobild have tested them before and then M5 Touring was quicker:

E63: 1:36,57 min
M5T: 1:34,81 min
RS6: 1:34,00 min

80-120 km/h
RS6: 2,7 s
M5: 2,5 s
E63: 2,7 s

0-200 km/h
RS6: 14,3 s
M5:14,7 s
E64: 15,1 s

0-100 km/h
RS6: 4,4 s
M5: 4,9 s
E63: 4,4 s

EDIT: I tried to find the test GTA was talking about but I cant find it. Maybe it isnt correct then. I will continue searching for it.


EDIT: here is the test. Again , its Autobild who did the test. funny they have two different conclusions :)

1. 1:50,81 min - Audi RS6 Avant
2. 1:51,83 min - Alpina B5 S Touring
3. 1:53,63 min - Mercedes E63 AMG T
4. 1:55,89 min - BMW M5 Touring

Even the Alpina beat the M5 T. Weird, M5 is a better handler than the Alpina for sure. Something must been wrong with this particulary M5 T :t-hands:
 

Trending content


Back
Top