GMA GMA T.50


GMA is a British maker founded in 2017 by Gordon Murray. It builds analog, V12-powered hypercars like the T.50 and T.33. Official: GMA
That tach... 13,000 rpm...

Hell yeah.
 
People, people...

My initial, snarky and entirely misplaced cynicism dispensed with, if you're a fan of driving dynamics and utterly dedicated & focused engineering, you have to watch the various video presentations of the GMA T50. Especially the Carfection one with Henry and Gordon just shooting the breeze.

This car is so special even I don't have words to sufficiently describe it. Absolutely jaw-dropping.
 
Not loving the design, sorry. The area above the real wheels (where bodywork meets the small rear window) looks horrible and not at all sporty. The original F1 is a LOT nicer looking.
 
Looks pretty shitty tbh, front is super weak.
But it’s to good to not be floored by.
Can’t wait to see what it can do.
There is still time to address the front from not until 2022.
Also sweet pagani huayra like exposed transmission tunnel and active aero flaps :)
 
This will be a car for the purist, and be the dogs-you-know what to drive, but at USD3m (more than the F1 cost in 1994 inflation adjusted) it had better be. Amazing that Gordon can do this on his own.
 
Epic doesn't describe it. The weight is the most impressive along with that insane V12. For comparison it's 13kg lighter than the Sesto Elemento, and this is a road-legal car!

It puts the McLaren Speedtail to shame. This is the true successor to the F1.
 
An incredible car for sure, but the design is a little weak, not very modern. Especially the front is tame.
 
986kg is apparently kerb weight, fluids included.
Yeah, apparently with fluids but no fuel. From many magazine tests I've figured that cars gain about 120kg on top their quoted dry weight, sometimes even up to 200kg (the Avendator is quoted at being 1575kg dry, but in magazine tests comes up regularly between 1750-1800kg. But most are around 120kg. I am not sure how exactly whichever magazines are weighing them, with how much fuel, or whether it is including driver or not, but it's never 29kg, or close to it. So either the manufacturer quoted dry weight is in almost all cases extremely optimistic, or there is something else going on. Even if you added full weight of 80l of fuel, that adds only 60kg, so at worst, the T.50 would weigh 1046kg. Which could be the case... guess we'll see.
 
Not loving the design, sorry. The area above the real whee...

This is not the production version. This is a display model. Notice that they didn't fire up the engine? I doubt there's anything in the engine bay below the valve cover.

Expect details to change with production.
 
Half tank of fuel + hefty driver = 1116 kg
Full tank of fuel + lean driver = 1121 kg
Let's not split hairs as to whether the plus fluids weight includes fuel or not. The weight of this thing is just unbelievable.
Same footprint as a Boxster GTS 4.0, twice as many cylinders, nearly 40% more RPM, 190 kW more power, 500 kg less and God knows what kind of short transmission ratio torque multiplication. It's almost unfathomable.
 
Harry was clearly disappointed about the blinker buttons on the steering wheel. That surprised me aswell.
Doesn't fit the "old fashioned" Gordon Murray taste in certain things.
An indicator stalk was fine and intuitive to use.
 
Yeah, apparently with fluids but no fuel. From many mag...
Basically all magazines in USA and Europe weigh the cars with full tank and without driver, so this is the norm used by almost all. I agree 986 must be with fluids but with empty tank, and kerb weight (with full tank) will then be around 1045 kg. So Murrays goal of under 1000 kg is only achieved with his peculiar way of measuring the weight.
 
Did not know it was going to be a manual. Instantly makes it my favorite current supercar.

Minor gripe, while the proportions are golden, some of the details are a bit soft (front) or contrived (rear) vs the purity of the F1.
 
Hmmmmm, gotta read up on it. Not impressed by the looks, but that engine.!!

M
 
The launch strategy for the car could have been better. Why not do one in-depth tour of thr car instead of doing 20-50min interviews with 6-10 different. youtube channels.

Other than that the technical details of the car are glorious. I like how the active aero including the fan can be used to increase or decrease drag.


There actually is a bit of electrical assistance at low sp...
It's best of both worlds. Once up to speed, light sports cars don't need power steering.
 

Trending content


Back
Top