^ No, ok - I see now where you're coming from - my bad. And I'm cool with your standpoint (and I got the irony of your earlier M question

)
I can sense and appreciate your passion and reverance for the M badge and that BMW may be tarnishing the reputation for M standing for all that is pure and glorious in sport motoring. But that is for an altogether different discussion in a BMW vs. AMG thread.
The discussion at hand is around BMW's new 5 GT as a product and not a thing of pinsharp dynamic prowess. It's true, I lack a view of progression on this topic. Quite simply because I fail to see any progress beyond the gratuitous proliferation of every cross-bred concept simply for the purposes of satisfying supposed individuality.
BMW said that the idea behind the X6 is that the car is aimed at style-conscious, executive, city slicker types to whom such a car appeals by virtue of its raised ride height and imperious view over traffic. An SAC that re-writes the rule books around SUV looks and dynamics. And I bought it. [The blurb not the car

]
Ok so now, here we have another body shape that's much the same. It's another five door fastback but now longer and lower to the ground. I'll wager who it's aimed at: "style-conscious, executive, city slicker types" who care less for raised ride height and want rear wheel drive.
I'm sorry, but then who are you going to sell F10's and F11's to?
More to the point: who is BMW trying to attract from competitor brands' customers? Mercedes Benz CLS owners? I highly doubt. Audi A6 Avant owners? Nope... not there either. In my mind, all they're creating is unnecessary intra-brand competition all the while incurring R&D costs and manufacturing costs and supply chain challenges and and and...