klier
Premium
Let'[s hope not because there's no democratic replacement.
The EU
Which will in a few years have a bigger army than what the U.S has.
Let'[s hope not because there's no democratic replacement.
The EU
Which will in a few years have a bigger army than what the U.S has.
Alas, I'll have to agree with you here. The EU and its NATO member states find themselves confronted with issues that pertain more to various individual yet collective mindsets rather than the issues of material armaments per se. And where the U.S. military has perhaps vast superiority is in the field of intelligence/surveillance.A comparable European force to the US military won't happen.
The required budget, the required economic and industrial development, the required international cooperation at state and corporate level won't happen, and even if it did all happen, and all happened overnight, the required defence projects take decades to come to fruition (even in the USA which is already home to half the world's top defence contractors), so all that stuff also needs to be maintained through countless national elections and governments. And eeeeeveeenn then, even if we'd had all that for decades, cooperation on deployment is far from a given.
I say this as a pro-European, but it's just not going to happen. Posturing about expenditure is for the headlines. There is not a single entity capable of collecting the tax, organising the military, dictating the policy and operating the resource like there is in the USA or China (or the old school USSR).
Anyway, this is well off topic now, if people want to debate European coalition defence policy I can move the posts to a new thread.
I should let it go and leave it to minds far more clever than myself.
A comparable European force to the US military won't happen. The required budget, the required economic and industrial development, the required international cooperation at state and corporate level won't happen, and even if it did all happen, and all happened overnight, the required defence projects take decades to come to fruition (even in the USA which is already home to half the world's top defence contractors), so all that stuff also needs to be maintained through countless national elections and governments. And eeeeeveeenn then, even if we'd had all that for decades, cooperation on deployment is far from a given.
I say this as a pro-European, but it's just not going to happen. Posturing about expenditure is for the headlines. There is not a single entity capable of collecting the tax, organising the military, dictating the policy and operating the resource like there is in the USA or China (or the old school USSR).
Anyway, this is well off topic now, if people want to debate European coalition defence policy I can move the posts to a new thread.
If you want unified pan-European action on defence, you have to vote for all the powers on taxation and expenditure to got to a unified pan-European government. This won't happen... because the EU means tethered bottle caps and bananas of a certain straightness, which soy boys vote against...
A comparable European force to the US military won't happen. The required budget, the required economic and industrial development, the required international cooperation at state and corporate level won't happen, and even if it did all happen
You should learn about former defence minister and now elected EU Empress Ursula von der Leyen. You will laugh too.It will happen, it's already happening and the EU has the largest concentration of wealth anywhere on the planet. All you mention is a piece of cake to resolve if they want to resolve. Which they want.
Times are changing for real now. Re arm Europe.
People like you and Scott who seems to laugh at the idea are in a tiny minority.
It will happen, it's already happening and the EU has the largest concentration of wealth anywhere on the planet. All you mention is a piece of cake to resolve if they want to resolve. Which THEY want.
Times are changing for real now. Re arm Europe.
People like you and Scott who seems to laugh at the idea are in a tiny minority.
Who, precisely, are "THEY" ?
Still, I appreciate the Trump/Vance/Musk wakeup call. May more and more EU member state citizens will realize that their countries can ONLY DEPEND ON THEMSELVES for protection of territory and general well-being. It is of existential significance.
Nonsense. Just thinking we get to vote for anything of substance is wild to being with.
People like you and Scott who seems to laugh at the idea are in a tiny minority.
It will happen, it's already happening and the EU has the largest concentration of wealth anywhere on the planet. All you mention is a piece of cake to resolve if they want to resolve. Which they want.
Times are changing for real now. Re arm Europe.
People like you and Scott who seems to laugh at the idea are in a tiny minority.
Also time to remove US troops from Europe and extricate themselves from NATO.
European countries have also made some stupid purchases, the number 1 being the F-35, they have to ask US permission every single time they fly it. The only countries with unlocked F-35's are the UK and Israel.
The technology is there, perhaps save the sophistication seen in U.S. or Israeli intelligence and surveillance equipment.
What tech and in what way? I'm genuinely interested.The tech is far beyond what the US is capable of.
What tech and in what way? I'm genuinely interested.
And where will this money come from?And now that money will be pouring in
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.