X6 Edmunds Inside Line: First Drive 2008 BMW X6 xDrive 50i


The BMW X6 is a mid-size luxury crossover SUV by German automaker BMW. The BMW X6 is the originator of the sports activity coupé (SAC), referencing its sloping rear roof design. It combines the attributes of an SUV (high ground clearance, all-wheel drive and all-weather ability, large wheels and tires) with the stance of a coupé (styling featuring a sloping roof).

Bartek S.

Aerodynamic Ace

Is More Agility Worth Less Utility?

It looks awkward in pictures and some find it hideous, but the 2008 BMW X6 50i isn't nearly as warped when you see it in person. It's kind of a supermodel from behind, with a slim, narrow roof at the top and curvaceous hips at the bottom. Designers call this sort of thing tumblehome, and an SUV without it looks like a refrigerator.

The front is all BMW with a big twin kidney grille and fighter-jet-size intakes at each corner. The roofline goes on forever in profile, giving the X6 a hatchback-style look that's unique at best, a little too forced at worst. The designers at BMW say it's "coupelike," so they — and they alone — call the X6 a Sports Activity Coupe.

It gets better from behind the wheel. Fire up the new 400-horsepower, 4.4-liter V8 and it sounds more like a carbureted big block than a sophisticated twin-turbo engine with direct injection. We don't remember an X5 sounding this burly.

So far this much is clear — pictures don't do the all-wheel-drive 2008 BMW X6 justice.

Lots of Power, Lots of Weight
On the road in North Carolina to drive the 2008 BMW X6 for the first time, we're fully expecting the X6 to smack us silly with its 450 pound-feet of torque. But this never quite happens. Instead, the six-speed automatic transmission shifts tentatively, as if it's worried that unleashing too much force at one time might eat a driveshaft or two.

Which may be the case, but it makes us doubt BMW's claimed 0-to-60-mph time of 5.3 seconds for the X6. That's only 0.3 second slower than the last 135i we tested, and the tiny coupe weighs 1,906 pounds less.

Yeah, that's no typo. The xDrive50i, as it's known in BMW-speak, weighs in at 5,269 pounds. That's 319 pounds more than the Porsche Cayenne S, an SUV that has never once been called light on its feet. Porsche claims a 0-to-60-mph time of 6.4 seconds for the 385-hp Cayenne S, so BMW's estimate of the X6's ability seems a bit optimistic.

That said, the power of the new twin-turbo BMW V8 is hardly the problem. The torque peak arrives early at 1,750 rpm and doesn't waver until 4,500 rpm. Throttle lag from the two turbos buried between the cylinder banks is minimal and the all-aluminum engine spins up to its 6,500-rpm redline without a noticeable hesitation in thrust.

And the sounds this BMW V8 makes are unmatched by any SUV on the road. Whether it's burbling at idle or headed for redline, the X6 makes you want to drive with the windows open to hear it do its work.

We Want More for Our $8,500
Once we discover the 2008 BMW X6 isn't the rocket we expected, we figure maybe the handling will convince us that the X6 is worth its $8,500 premium over the BMW X5 4.8i. But after 20 miles of wet switchbacks in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina, we're still not buying it.

Don't get the wrong impression; the X6 is shockingly agile. The quick steering makes it easy to arc into bends, and there's so little body roll that you feel like you're barely pushing the vehicle's limits. The massive 14.4-inch brake rotors up front burn off the speed in an instant and the fat tires are gripping the pavement like it's bone dry.

Unless you drive it back-to-back with the X5, however, you'd be unlikely to notice any particular improvement over the 2008 BMW X5.

Compared to the X5, a slightly revised front suspension helps the X6 track better over rough surfaces while a 2-inch-wider rear track adds some stability. Our test vehicle also has the optional Sport package, which adds an impressive set of 20-inch wheels wrapped in 275/40R20 tires up front and 315/35R20 rubber in back, a combination that's also available for the X5.

Yes, Another Acronym
One advantage the X6 has over the X5 — and just about any other SUV save the Acura MDX— is a new torque distribution system known as Dynamic Performance Control (DPC). In simplest terms, DPC is able to redirect power to each of the four wheels in varying degrees. And it's not just for traction control either, as DPC actively intervenes to help control the directional stability of the X6 as well. (The 2008 Saab 9-3 Aero XWD recently gave us a taste of much the same thing in a sedan package.)

Powering out of tight hairpins, we feel only the slightest hints of the system working, but there's no doubt that the X6 is firing out of wet corners with impressive drive. Still, BMW figured the X6 might need some help demonstrating the new system, so it arranged for us to drive a road course at Michelin's Laurens proving grounds that had been soaked by sprinklers.

Flat-footing the X6 out of soaked hairpins here makes the benefit of DPC far more obvious. In most SUVs, such a maneuver would initiate the intervention of so many various stability control systems that the gas pedal would be rendered useless. With DPC, you still get power, but it jumps from one wheel to the other as each one struggles to grab the pavement. The forward bite is a little jerky when you're hard on the throttle, and we have to remind ourselves that even DPC has its limits and we should be wary of pedaling the X6 right into the grass.

We get some time on a dry course as well and here again the X6 is solid and precise where most other SUVs would be flailing with understeer. There's so much grip from the massive tires we wonder if we could go much faster with a proper sports car. Yes, it's that good. Still, the X5 remains stuck in our heads. Would we be going much slower and with any less confidence in a 4.8i? Not by much.

The Utility of a Coupe
With all the fun stuff out of the way, we're left to consider the X6's cabin. The low roof makes it obvious that there's less space inside, but does it matter much? Depends what you consider important. Up front, we don't notice a thing. Without looking at the impossibly small hatch opening in the rearview mirror, we can't tell the difference between the X6 and the bigger X5.

Nearly all the design elements are the same. There are simple analog gauges, high-quality interior trim and an overly complex yet space-saving console-mounted shift lever. All X6s get a sport steering wheel as standard as well as cushions on the center console to help brace yourself while you're cornering hard.

The rear seats in the X6 are designed to hold only two passengers, so there's a big center console back there, too. The seats prove far more comfortable than your standard, three-person bench seat, although the low roof shaves nearly 2 inches of headroom from the X5's numbers.

There's plenty of legroom and decent foot room under the front seats, but we quickly determine that with two adults in back, the overall rear-seat space feels cramped. Maybe it's the fact that if you're over 6 feet you can rest your head on the roof, or the slightly reduced shoulder room. Either way, it's tighter and less comfortable than an X5.

It's the same story when it comes to cargo room. The X6 has a respectable 59.7 cubic feet of cargo space with the second-row seats folded, but the X5 offers up to 75 cubic feet in the same configuration.

Is More Agility Worth Less Utility?
When the drive is done, we're still scratching our heads. An extra $8 grand for a little more motor, fewer seats with less room and an all-wheel-drive system you'll hardly ever know is there?

The 2008 BMW X6 is trying to make the utility vehicle a personal vehicle, something stylish, powerful and agile. But the compromises in utility leave us wondering if BMW has just created a very heavy small car at a very big price. No amount of tumblehome is going to change that.




http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FirstDrives/articleId=125474?tid=edmunds.il.home.photopanel..1.*#2
 
X6 = DOD for the X5 in my opinion. This car... er... SAC... whatever... looks like it will eat into the X5s sales and cause that truck to be almost phased out completely. Give it a few years. I think the X5 is dead.
 
No way. The X6 is far too impractical to obsolete the X5. It may eat into the X5's sales a bit initially, but once people see what a vanity purchase the X6 is the X5 will be just fine. CLS cut into E-Class sales at first and then dropped off while the E picked back up. Same will happen with the X5 and X6. X6 will sell on looks, both inside and out, better engines and most importantly a more connected driving experience. X5 will sell on cheaper price (relatively) and much better utility relative to the X6.

M
 
Well you could possibly be correct, I just see the entire industry turning away from your conventional SUV of yester-year which arguably the X5 doesn't fit into to begin with. I certainly hope that the majority of X5 owners use their cars like they are intended, but I know of one personally that doesn't at all with the exception of carting the lab around in a cage in the back. I would say she is probably a good chunk of X5 buyers. When you are dealing with upper niche luxury vehicles like this you have to wonder why owners are really buying the car in the first place, utility or prestige? I would say it's prestige first and utility last. But what do I know? I will probably never be in the market for one of these cars so my perspective could be warped. :t-hands: I can just see BMW introducing a bench seat in back and an inline 6 and diesel variants and having a really big success on a grand scale. But that may not be the intention of BMWUSA at all. But what do we know?
 
Well those buying for the badge will definitely go for the X6. Those buying for the badge and some utility at times will go for the X5. X5 is somewhat cheaper too. A lot of people will get the impression of a big lack of room in the rear seat and cargo hold of the X6 and immediately cross it off their list, even though they won't really use the room of the X5 all that much. I think there is room for both.

M
 
No way. The X6 is far too impractical to obsolete the X5. It may eat into the X5's sales a bit initially, but once people see what a vanity purchase the X6 is the X5 will be just fine. CLS cut into E-Class sales at first and then dropped off while the E picked back up. Same will happen with the X5 and X6. X6 will sell on looks, both inside and out, better engines and most importantly a more connected driving experience. X5 will sell on cheaper price (relatively) and much better utility relative to the X6.

M


Merc1's hit the nail on the head.

The X6 is to the X5 as the CLS is to the E-class. The X5 and the E-class being the conventional model, and the X6 and CLS being cost-efficient derivatives that are aimed to capture a market that is more focused on vanity (great word to explain it Merc!!). ...and just like we're seeing with the CLS, the X6 will most likely experience strong initial sales as people flock to its stylish, and rather unique concept (though personally I don't like its overall shape).... but then once that initial demand dies off, sales will settle back down to a niche-vehicle level, while the X5 will gain a second lease on life in sales.

You have to remember, the whole SUV/4WD market is HUGE in the United States... it is a very different culture in relation to SUV's over in the States. The Infiniti FX kick-started this trend of redefining what an SUV can be..and now BMW is doing the same by offering something which is more a fashion statement and a vehicle for people who gain satisfaction from differentiating themselves from the 'typical' SUV owner. The X5's proper utility in comparison to the X6 will be more than enough to keep its sales going.

The X6 would be more a competitor to the Porsche Cayenne, Range Rover, RR Sports, and other SUVs which have a sense of 'status' and 'fashionable to be seen in one' imagery associated with them.

And finally, you also have to remember that the X6 was a simple solution/excuse for BMW to develop an M version SUV to take on AMG's SUV vehicles, as well as Porsche's Cayenne range.
 
X6 is aimed at customers who want a stylish & performance oriented SUV-like vehicle (huge dimensions = huge presence, higher sitting position = commanding position, sporty image = coupeish shape & performance capabilities vs the rivals).

Till X6 arrival such customers had to pick RR Sport, Cayenne, and top-end versions / sport packages (M, S, AMG) of X5, Q7, ML. They buy an SUV due the presence, not due the practicability. SUV as an image car - as a statement.

Now with X6 BMW are introducing something even more extravagant in an SUV sub-segment (=SAC) - a car with even greater presence & image factor. And unparalleled sporty appearence (due the coupeish shape).

Yes, even some soccer moms will opt for it - due the stylish design. The ones with max 2 children, and w/o pets etc. Modern (sub)urban moms.

The others who want more practicability will go for X5, X3, or F5 (when available; that's the car which suits perfect to modern image-conscious soccer moms / small young families with high incomes).

Mind the coupes are all about image. Is 1er coupe practical? Is 3er coupe practical? Is 6er coupe practical? NO! But people still buy them - even the less sporty models (eg. 320i, 320d, 120d, 630i, 635d), so they buy them for the image not the performance. Same case with X6.

X6 - an image (coupe) car. Yet this time it is not based on a sedan / hatch but on an SUV.

:t-cheers:



And again: wealthy people can afford to buy impractical cars (= image cars). Something we "the common people" will never understand. ;)
And that applies not only to the cars but also to the other image-goods (clothes, accessories, jewelery, furniture etc). Image before practicability (or value-for-money factor). That the reason luxury brands & goods exist. If everyone were buying only practical & reasonably priced goods the luxury goods would not exist. Humans posses a lot of vain factor in their nature. :D
 
And again: wealthy people can afford to buy impractical cars (= image cars). Something we "the common people" will never understand. ;)


I am not wealthy at all, but I perfectly can understand someone picking an X6 over an X5. Practicability is not always the first criteria of choice, even for me!
However the X6 will not threaten the X5 at all, it won't sell even half as good as the X5. It's not aimed to sell that much, either. The X5 will remain the power-seller.

When I first saw the CLS, I remeber saying to myself: My God, they just killed the E-Class! Honestly, I could not see ANYBODY still buying an E-Class over this wonderful car, bar taxis and large families.

It turns out that the E-Class still sells way more than the CLS.

So, I think the X5 should not be declared dead too soon...
 
What I've gathered SUV-market is different in the USA and that is propably where BMW is aiming for. In the rest of the world it might just end up being another CLS.

Good article.
 
The SUV market in America is gasping for breath and you can see it from all of cross-overs invading the market. If gas prices remain at their highs now, and will more than likely continue to climb, I don't see that big of a market. There are so many factors working against the large SUV market I really believe you're going to see a much different picture of the American shopping mall in the not so distant future.
 

BMW

Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, abbreviated as BMW is a German multinational manufacturer of luxury vehicles and motorcycles headquartered in Munich, Bavaria, Germany. The company was founded in 1916 as a manufacturer of aircraft engines, which it produced from 1917 to 1918 and again from 1933 to 1945.
Official website: BMW (Global), BMW (USA)

Trending content


Back
Top