7 Series Development/Entwicklung of 7er Throughout The Ages


The BMW 7 Series is a full-size top-of-the-line luxury sedan produced by BMW. Officially introduced in 1977, it is the successor to the E3 "New Six" sedan.

Carmaker1

Quattro Commander
Messages
533
After the holiday, I want to outlay and discuss development history of various generations of not only the 7er, but other BMWs (plus other brands) and if possible, clear up any misconceptions on my part or others. In the meantime (until later in the week), this is stuff I have come across over the past several years and wondered if anyone else took note.

E38 1:1 Clay circa 1990, Prototype Testing of E32-based mule, E38 Prototypes Testing.

E38 Erlkonig Entwicklung 1991-1992.webp

Interior Design Effort circa 1990-91

E38 Design Interiur 2 1991.webp



E38 Design Interiur 1991.webp

Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing

E38 Electro-Magnetic Compatibility Test.webp


17 November 1993 Demonstation of E38 Infotainment LCD Display, first factory system in Europe for GPS Navigation. (I-Drive Ancestor)

E38 GPS Nav 1993-11-17.webp


This photos are from development of the E38 between 1991 and 1993, which I am under the impression had engineering sign-off in mid-1993 and started pilot production on July 23, 1993, ahead of what I believe to be a February 17, 1994 SOP, based on (gathered from) Harvard research done with BMW between 1991 and 1992, on the ongoing E38 programme.

My research on that, came from Harvard (I presume), where they were studying the prototyping process for the E38 programme, targeted for 1994 launch. This research stated, that on June 12, 1991, the E38 had been in development for just under 3 1/2 years. Naturally I assume, "under 3 1/2 years" points to January or February 1988, when development started. Makes sense, as it follows completion of E32 staggered launches in 1986 and 1987.

Over the years, I have seen some misconceptions, that claim Chris Bangle designed the E38. Naturally, that reads as rather misinformed, being fallaciously based on him design chief when the car was launched in 1994. As we all know, it doesn't matter if who is in the head design office when a car is launched. Lead times matter, especially as he started on October 1, 1992.

Similarly, Sensual Purity language of Mercedes-Benz didn't come to fruition in public until about late 2012-13, despite Wagener taking his position effective June 2008 from Peter Pfeiffer. You pretty much had "transitional" efforts in between that. Anyways, I digress.

Chris Bangle noted himself, believe it or not, that the E38 was in its final wrap-up as of October 1, 1992. August 1992 spy shots of the E38, agree with him (will post bigger resolution later).
E38 August 1992 Spy.webp

My question is, when would it have been frozen with no major alterations? In 1991? Or was BMW's approach to settle on the design (4-5 years early), then wait until 18 months before production for design freeze (different from now)? According to the 1992 Harvard research, that was the case (and also that the Lexus LS 400, was a major threat and the E38 was developed in response to fend them off in key markets).

Upon E38 press reveal to Australia on May 13, 1994, BMW spokespeople claimed that the gaffe of the poorly received W140 S-Class in 1991, had no bearing on their decision-making process, as the E38 design had been approved before the W140 Benz was "released". Keyword of "released" is too murky and could have meant went on sale or simple reveal.

I have hard time over the years, concretely outlining development of that car. The E32 was easy, as project began in September 1979, the design was frozen in 1984 and previously approved in 1983 at 1:1 scale, before 1986 SOP. E65 is also easy, as has been F01 and G11 (somewhat). E23 development might have started in October 1972. No really talks about it, compared to other generations.

Anyway, the E38 though, was being finished up during a depressing, chaotic era for BMW's design department.

In April 1990, Claus Luthe stabbed his 33-year old drug addicted son during Easter and left BMW as a result. At that time, the E31 was being launched and E36 sedan was a few months away from reveal, plus other finishing touches being done on other variants of the E36 family.

The lone model redesign being heavily developed during that period, was the flagship that would replace the lauded E32, now 4 years on the market since 1986. By the dawn of May 1990, BMW no longer had an official design chief, which in some ways ended up being temporarily absorbed by BMW mastermind, Dr. Wolfgang Reitzle, the vaunted ex-head of BMW R&D and who I consider, the key to BMW's magic that helped overtake Daimler-Benz AG in global sales in 1992.
E38 Design Entwicklung.webp
However, on two occasions, former BMW designer Boyke Boyer (retired), has been heard complaining in retrospect about the 1990-92 period about egoistic BMW engineer(s), discarding the relevance of BMW designers. I cannot help but wonder, if he was indirectly referring to Reitzle's infamously arrogant personality and stubbornness, clashing on the E38 programme due to Luthe's absence?

When Chris Bangle was hired in 1992, much of the designs signed-off through 1999, had been micromanaged by Reitzle (and his board influence), especially the E46. It is obvious, up until the Z8. He had been rumoured to have involved himself in that aspect too much regarding production models, leaving his "pet" design chief to rally the designers for advanced projects (studies, concepts). In the end Bangle won of course, when he left.

In a Business Week publication dated August 12, 1991, Dr. Reitzle was quoted saying that he was imperative that the 1994 model year E32 replacement took just 36 months to engineer, unlike that of the E36 saloon at 42 months and E30 at 48 months. I question how easily that target was achieved for a more complex flagship, especially during infancy of CAD, considering that the later launched E39 5er took an estimated 38-39 months and same for the Z3 at 38-39 months, that were both developed in parallel. for that matter, what context does "engineer" refer to?

Even as one, I do ask this question. Work on the E38 began in early 1988 and production started 6 years later, so does 36 months refer to the period before Job 1 (in Feb 1994) and after design freeze or basic final approval? Or does it even point to 36 months before pilot production in July 1993. Context with all this so called info is rather difficult in fully grasp, as the interviewer and interviewee may not mutually understand each other.

Starting in February and March 1991, German magazine publications started posting near-accurate renderings of the E38. None of them (currently accessible examples) really had spy shots per se, until about 1992.

E38 Rendering Juli 1991
Siebner 91 07.webp


Late Februar 1992 Rendering of E38 from AB.
Siebner 1991.webp

A similar pattern happened with a July 1, 1992 edition of a Auto Car magazine, discussing "BMW's new sports car" which was ironically just 38 months before the Z3 entered production in September 1995. The E37 design was set in June 1992, from what I can observe. However, Chris Bangle noted that while the E38 was finalized, he stated that the E39 and E37 Z3, were "in the oven", but already designed a few months beforehand.
E37Clay 1992.webp

E37 Clay 1992.webp

E37 Rendering Autocar.webp
Considering that Carl-Peter Forster became chief engineer in 1993 for the E39, I can speculate both cars were frozen in early 1993 (past archived interview, spoke on E39 cockpit being finished in 1993).

The first prototypes were built in 1993. First E37 renderings at this point, emerged when the final design was chosen internally. Nowadays not quite like that with magazines, but back then that pattern seems to make sense. Magazines didn't waste time speculating too early on designs that had not even been even finished internally (like G20 renderings from early 2015). If I am wrong, please correct me.

I am trying to determine if Claus Luthe would've preceded over final selection of the E38 design before he left in April 1990. I can't imagine he would be able to, as he left nearly (45-46 months) 4 years before production began in 1994. Reitzle had a notable role in the E38, but to what degree with design? Bangle had no involvement in that car, save for some small input on the E38 LCi efforts during 1995-96.

Some research I have found, tells me that the E38 design might have been approved as early as 1990, but more likely the second half after Luthe left. By the time Luthe returned as an external consultant in 1992 (allegedly helping with E39 and Z3 in mid-1992), the E38 was pretty much done, so who was the design chief for it? If not Luthe, was it Wolfgang Reitzle? If Luthe was there prior to full-scale model stages for the E38, does he get any credit?


On another note, in some Deustche language sites, I keep seeing a fallacy, that claims the E38 was unveiled at the IAA 1993. I am strongly convinced that it wasn't, as only Audi's Aluminium Space Frame Concept was showcased and the E38 was still in camouflage up until then. The E38 was revealed during the spring period of 1994, usually pointing to May 1994 (although some publications posted on it earlier than May 1994).

I will continue add to this thread any information on development of the 7er/Siebner/7-Series nameplate from 1972 to present.

(There are some photos missing, so I will add them later.)
 
The E38 7 series was most certainly not presented at the IAA 1993. Audis' ASF Concept (which was the precursor for the series I A8) headlined the luxury sedan segment offerings of that particular venue.

Porsches' 993 series Carrera was also presented at the IAA 1993. As was the Euro-spec version of Cadillacs' 4th gen STS sedan (which I actually rather liked. But I'm not certain whether GM managed to sell more than say, 2-3 dozen units in the whole of Europe.).
 
The E38 7 series was most certainly not presented at the IAA 1993. Audis' ASF Concept (which was the precursor for the series I A8) headlined the luxury sedan segment offerings of that particular venue.

Porsches' 993 series Carrera was also presented at the IAA 1993. As was the Euro-spec version of Cadillacs' 4th gen STS sedan (which I actually rather liked. But I'm not certain whether GM managed to sell more than say, 2-3 dozen units in the whole of Europe.).

Thanks, I thought so. I read about 6 years ago, that the motor show debut for the E38 was at Auto China Beijing, in June 1994. Still doesn't explain to me, when it went on sale in Germany.

To be honest, I can see why the STS didn't sell well. I don't think large FWD V8 cars sell very well overall, which explains their extinction today. Interior was better than 80s Cadillacs, but for whatever reason didn't appeal to Europe as much as it did with Middle America.

Just found out the car was unveiled on February 18, 1994. The embargo ended on May 2, 1994, which is when one started hearing more about the car during the course of May 1994. Wasn't shown at '94 Geneve/Genf Auto Salon in March 1994 for some weird reason? Yet Auto China Beijing was a better choice in June 1994? Maybe because BMW China operations were inaugurated that year.
 
This was the original BMW Group press release from February 18, 1994, showcasing the first official photos of the E38 7-Series ahead of its June 1994 Deutschland market launch. The example above from the press release kit, is a pilot production 730i sedan, assembled in 1993 (PP started on the 23rd of July 1993.) and taken from a 1993 photoshoot.

Series production seems to have started in April 1994, so Reitzle missed his 1991 target of 36 months to engineer.

E38 1993 Prototyp Presse Foto 1994-02-18 Exterieur.webp
E38 1993 Presse Foto Ruckseite 1994-02-18.webp
E38 1993 Presse Foto 1994-02-18.webp
E38 1993 Presse Foto 1994-02-18 Interieur.webp

18 Februar 1994

"Die ersten offiziellen Fotos vom neuen 7er BMW
Im Juni 1994 kommt der neue 7er BMW auf den Markt. Die BMW Palette reicht damit vom nur 4,20 Meter kurzen compact bis zur luxuriösen Limousine, deren "innere Werte" wie Platzangebot und Behaglichkeit deutlich, deren Ausmaße jedoch nur unmerklich gewachsen sind."

"Die neue 7er Reihe von BMW
Mit der Einführung der neuen 7er Reihe von BMW reicht die Produktpalette im Juni 1994 vom nur 4,20 Meter kurzen compact bis zur luxuriösen Limousine, deren "innere" Werte wie Platzangebot und Behaglichkeit deutlich, deren Ausmaße jedoch nur unmerklich gewachsen sind."
 
...and to this day, one of the most impressive luxury sedans ever. Back around 1996/97, there was an Alpina B12 E38 SWB identical to the one pictured below frequently parked in the carpark near my office. I recall countless occasions in which I stood mesmerized, simply gazing in sheer fascination.

1996-alpina-b12-e38-facelift-sedan-6.webp
 
Reitzle wanted to make the next 7er a cathedral on wheels, but these plans were scraped, when the most prominent duo working ever for BMW - Pischetsrieder/Reitzle was dethroned because of the Rover fiasco
 
Reitzle wanted to make the next 7er a cathedral on wheels, but these plans were scraped, when the most prominent duo working ever for BMW - Pischetsrieder/Reitzle was dethroned because of the Rover fiasco

Can you expand on in what ways they wanted make it a "cathedral on wheels." Curious to see what they had in mind for the E65.

Speaking of the E65, I remember that Car & Driver (my mag of choice, back in the day) had a rendering for what was supposed to be the E65. It was sleek and an evolution of the E38. It was beautiful.

Then ol' lumpy butt showed up. Imagine my disappointment and how jarring it was going from the highs of the E38 and that rendering to the E65. I'll see if I can find on the interwebs.
 
Can you expand on in what ways they wanted make it a "cathedral on wheels." Curious to see what they had in mind for the E65.

Speaking of the E65, I remember that Car & Driver (my mag of choice, back in the day) had a rendering for what was supposed to be the E65. It was sleek and an evolution of the E38. It was beautiful.

Then ol' lumpy butt showed up. Imagine my disappointment and how jarring it was going from the highs of the E38 and that rendering to the E65. I'll see if I can find on the interwebs.
Huge, extremely comfortable, luxurious and very conservative, with the last one being completely changed at the end
 
Glad many of us are interested, as I will be adding more slowly on the E32 and E65, plus the more contemporary F01 and G11. BMW's next 7-Series is in development, on its way in 5 years time. The G11 LCI is coming within 15 months.

In the meantime, here's a little more. In September 1979, BMW set out to develop the world's best luxury sedan, with the code name E32. At the forefront of this car's development, was Dr. Wolfgang Reitzle. The goal was to dethrone the W126 S-Class, which had quickly usurped the 1977 launch of the E23 within a short 2 years. In many ways, they succeeded with this goal in domestic Westdeutschland.
BMW E32 1982-83.webp
BMW E32 1983.webp

This was a clay model of this car underway (circa 1982-1983). Before reveal in the summer of 1986, Bruno Sacco of Mercedes-Benz was shown a running prototype in an underground parking garage in an effort to boast and intimidate MB. In response, in November 1990, MB boldly showed to BMW CEO, a 1:1 mockup of the W140 (dumb idea since E38 work was at a critical point).
 
Yes, I recall the sales success of the E32 7 series as well. M-Bs' wonderful W126 S-Class had become a bit long-in-tooth and Audis' C3 200/V8 was unable to attain the status that its' German rivals commanded. The introduction of the V12 (750i/750il) in the E32 was a massive "image booster" as well. M-Bs' W126 successor, the W140, was received quite critically upon its' introduction. Many observers viewed it as being an " unbecoming, slab-sided, tank-like gargantuan" , "a testimony to over-engineered, socially irresponsible pomposity" and Dr. Werner Niefers' "own personal ego schmooze".
 
The E38 is one of my favorite 7-series models, the design is still so sleek, elegant and timeless. The interior design was superb, especially the rippled leather used on the super comfy seats and the great looking door panels were very classy.

Here is the original promotional video.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

A write up from this video is included on Youtube about the cars development and introduction.

Did You know that?:Total of 340,242 E38s were produced! The BMW E38 model was the basis for the 1995 through 2001 BMW 7 Series automobiles. In early 1988, development began on the third generation 7-series codenamed "Entwicklung 99". From 1989 to 1991 styling work was done, when Boyke Boyer's concept design was chosen and further refined into production form with engineers until 1992. In August 1992, the final production design for the new 7-series was approved by the board for production. On April 27, 1993 German design patents were filed featuring a pre-production prototype as a design representation. Patents were later filed on October 27, 1993 in the United States. In early 1994, development concluded and in May 1994, the 1995 E38 BMW 7-Series was unveiled. Production started on February 17, 1994 on pilot production variants, with series production commencing in the second half of the year. The base prices in 2001 were US$62,900 for the 740i, US$66,900 for the 740iL and US$92,100 for the 750iL. Features of the E38 7 Series included high-pressure headlight washers, auto-leveling xenon HID headlamps, power moonroof, a sound system with 14 speakers and four subwoofers as well as 6-disc CD changer, onboard satellite navigation and rain-sensing wipers. Other features included an automatic climate control system with separate controls for the driver and passenger, a three-position memory system for the driver's seat, safety-belt height, new steering wheel and outside mirrors. Front-seat side airbags and a Head Protection System (HPS) were also standard. When the E38 was phased out in 2001 to make way for the new E65, sales of E38s increased noticeably in the car's final months of sales as people moved to buy the car before it was replaced for the 2002 model year.
 
The E38 is one of my favorite 7-series models, the design is still so sleek, elegant and timeless. The interior design was superb, especially the rippled leather used on the super comfy seats and the great looking door panels were very classy.

Here is the original promotional video.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

A write up from this video is included on Youtube about the cars development and introduction.

Did You know that?:Total of 340,242 E38s were produced! The BMW E38 model was the basis for the 1995 through 2001 BMW 7 Series automobiles. In early 1988, development began on the third generation 7-series codenamed "Entwicklung 99". From 1989 to 1991 styling work was done, when Boyke Boyer's concept design was chosen and further refined into production form with engineers until 1992. In August 1992, the final production design for the new 7-series was approved by the board for production. On April 27, 1993 German design patents were filed featuring a pre-production prototype as a design representation. Patents were later filed on October 27, 1993 in the United States. In early 1994, development concluded and in May 1994, the 1995 E38 BMW 7-Series was unveiled. Production started on February 17, 1994 on pilot production variants, with series production commencing in the second half of the year. The base prices in 2001 were US$62,900 for the 740i, US$66,900 for the 740iL and US$92,100 for the 750iL. Features of the E38 7...

Thank you for posting this video, as it is very crucial to this discussion. For some reason, early E38 press videos are very hard to come by. This video was shot in July 1994, despite coming a few weeks after E38 sales start in Germany.

Sorry, but the highlighted in bold parts of the video description is inaccurate and based on mistakes I personally had made years ago, charting out the gestation of the E38. The design for the E38 was not in development in 1992, having been finished mostly the year before and somewhat definitive in 1990.

What doesn't make sense, is the Harvard claim in 1992 that BMW completed "full design freeze" at 18 months before production starts. How is that even possible, when today's cars take longer? Sure, the E32 design was frozen in October 1984 before June 1986 SOP, but that was simply based on a casualty with width and not actually intended from 1979 SOD.

Full E38 unveiling was May 2, 1994 after the embargo was lifted, following the first press release on February 18, 1994. Development through engineering sign-off was in mid-1993, before July 23, 1993 pilots, switching over to series cars in April 1994.

I am actually making this thread, to serve as a primary reference guide to this nameplate's history. Much of the inaccurate text above once came from Wikipedia, where I have occasionally fought to remove/correct erroneous information, to dispel any inaccuracies and eliminate the potential for confusion. I want German Car Forum to be the definitive source on the history of past, present, and future models.
 
...and to this day, one of the most impressive luxury sedans ever. Back around 1996/97, there was an Alpina B12 E38 SWB identical to the one pictured below frequently parked in the carpark near my office. I recall countless occasions in which I stood mesmerized, simply gazing in sheer fascination.

1996-alpina-b12-e38-facelift-sedan-6.webp

Growing up, the E38 was the first BMW in my immediate family (parents/sibs), while solely living in the US (21-year period). Maternal granddad had kept an E32 since early 90s retirement (ending his secondary BMW distribution role), but lived too faraway in Africa. This car was my first taste of BMW.

Today is my mother's birthday again, but no new car this year (currently visiting with them). Seventeen years ago, her first 7er was a surprise gift on December 27, 2000, quietly special ordered (3 months ahead) and bought by my father (Dr. N) for her 40th. Here is something close to it. (Most shots have us kids leaning against the car)

80-229244a8b6f45fa38357e929eb0afd05_a5e83ce78a9245ce7dc60aded7deb373066eb71d.webp

A 2001 model year US-spec, 740iL Highline in Midnight Blue. My dad's then-new Jaguar (XJ8) Vanden Plas S/C paled in comparison, technology wise to this car and I embarrassed my father highlighting this fact to our family friends, as a 10-year old.

I will never forget that car (E38), as I desperately hoped it would be retained and passed down to me. I grew up with that car and have so many memories of it, especially during the first 9 months of ownership. By 2006, my parents felt a BMW didn't suffice as a first car for me and wanted more parking space.

:(Sadly, they sold it almost 12 years ago when she acquired a 2006 model year E66 760Li on December 27, 2005 as a surprise again (like 5 years earlier). It has been a tradition of my father's to surprise my mother on her birthday with a new 7er. This very model generation of E38 runs very close to my heart and is why I have great passion over it, being the very first tech-laden and dynamic automobile I had close access to as a child.

Posting on this car and knowing its history inside-out, does help me get past my long-held annoyance at my parents' short-sighted decision to dump it. Just too bad I didn't independently have the money at that age, to buy it from her.


Reitzle wanted to make the next 7er a cathedral on wheels, but these plans were scraped, when the most prominent duo working ever for BMW - Pischetsrieder/Reitzle was dethroned because of the Rover fiasco

Yes, sounds exactly like what was intended. Between Land Rover's L322 and the E65 programme, Reitzle was obsessed with attention to detail and reaching the heights. His zeal was just something else from what I have heard. Pischetsrieder sadly had better "rapport" with staff, while Reitzle was deemed arrogant and too flamboyant, but a superb perfectionist. Unfairly accused of also stifling creativity after he left BMW.(so untrue, save for BMW designers' complaints)

Stupid Eberhard von Kuenheim screwed over BMW, by appointing the former as the next CEO to spite Reiztle (for attempting to succeed Ulrich Bez as Porsche CEO in 1991) and in some ways, allegedly made the Pischetsrieder his puppet in the mid-late 1990s. People have questionably claimed, that von Kuenheim engineered the Rover buyout behind the scenes through Pischetsrieder.

This reminds me of how Chrysler's Lee Iacocca destroyed Chrysler, by punishing genius Robert Lutz with appointing weak & greedy Robert Eaton as his successor in 1992 (eff. 1993), who sold out wealthy Chrysler to Jurgen Schrempp by 1998 and made Chrysler nearly insolvent by 2007 (Dieter Zetsche did his best to salvage the messes of Eaton and Schrempp, by ending merger).

Anyway, Reitzle had the right ideas for this company, as well as Jaguar and Land Rover. Reitzle plainly left of his own accord on February 5, 1999, because of the fact he was snubbed for the position of CEO, moments after Pischetsrieder resigned at a BMW board meeting that same day.

At that time (February 5, 1999), you had the E46 Compact, E46 M3, E39 LCI, and E65 7er (just a few weeks) fresh off of their design freezes. E85 Z4, E60 5er, E83 X3 all in development. Plus market launch of the E39 M5, one month until E46 coupe debut, E46 Touring for IAA, E37 LCI and E46 cabriolet doing the test rounds, E53 X5 had been unveiled and E52 Z8 was finishing up development. Not to mention a few months beforehand, the E38 LCi and 9 months of the E46 sedan on the market. (Other devl. started in 1999, but later on)

All these vehicles had Dr. Wolfgang Reitzle's input, especially from scratch. Egos too many times, get in the way of good things. Joachim Milberg should have never become CEO, over Dr. Reitzle. I cannot help, but wonder if the Quandts are to blame for his departure? There has always an element of secrecy, regarding the specific board members that caused him to leave out of disappointment with that February 5, 1999 meeting. A lot of JLR greatness came from his initial touch at Ford PAG.

Regarding the E65, from about 1996 to about mid-1998, this was indeed the plan for it. Little did he know, Bangle was not too pleased with his stringent micromanagement of the design process, when Bangle had started trying to get his feet starting in 1993 with E46 programme and had been put in his place by Reitzle with that car, the E53, and E52 project.

Maybe the E37 M Coupe might have allowed for some creativity, but Reitzle didn't give Bangle any room in the production sector. Only advanced design projects, allowed Bangle to play with ideas, leaving Reitzle a little bit too much leeway as a non-designer. And also as Reitzle's mouthpiece for design. The E46, E53 X5, and E52 Z8 are what I call, Bangle-lite cars.

It wasn't until Project Blue from August 1996 through February 1997, that Bangle might've truly started making his mark in clout for drive-able & buyable BMWs. Coincidentally, design of the E65 began at the dawn of 1997.

Because of the cynical press towards the reveal of the E46, starting on November 11, 1997 with the first press photos and culminating with its early February 1998 introduction in Spain, BMW management felt threatened with the possibility that they would fall prey to being seen as staid. Especially hearing the same commentary in early 1994 and late 1995 respectively, towards the E38 7er and E39 5er.

At this point by sometime in the second quarter in 1998, Bangle since early 1997 had been closely following Adrian van Hooydonk's various E65 sketches and clay proposals, promising to vouch for him outside of Reitzle's earshot. By chance after hearing all the hubbub towards the 1994-98 lineup, BMW was pressed to follow through with their design revolution and not just toy with it, by doing it on the interior and halfheartedly on the exterior.

Bangle used against the board, the fact that things (possibly Reitzle's way) weren't working anymore and they needed to really take that new approach and dismiss the other design proposals, against Adrian van Hooydonk's. Crucially listening to Bangle over Reitzle, they choose Adrian's proposal. The conservative design proposal he favoured, was the one rejected in favour of Bangle's choice in van Hooydonk. Rumoured to have been much better execution for a 21st century 7er, following the E38, albeit conservative.

By January 1999, the design freeze had been completed with some concessions to the radical design and no time to fix the car, like Reitzle somehow was counting on (expecting to be future BMW CEO).

Reitzle just might have heard whispers since December 1998 of Bernd Pischetsrieder's memos to resign if things worsened and then came to the Feb 5, 1999 meeting guns ablazing, only to be so infuriated and embarrassed when he wasn't given resounding yeses, literally across the board.

It was all ego in this respect, just like when he left Ford's PAG (Premier Auto Group) over not liking a new Ford President & COO Nick Scheele. Reitzle's has been his own worst enemy in the automotive industry, despite being so brilliant and hard-working.

He is the template of what I want to become professionally. Going from engineer to head of the firm.

I will post a few sketches for the E65 program, from 1997 and 1998, in a little bit.

Can you expand on in what ways they wanted make it a "cathedral on wheels." Curious to see what they had in mind for the E65.

Speaking of the E65, I remember that Car & Driver (my mag of choice, back in the day) had a rendering for what was supposed to be the E65. It was sleek and an evolution of the E38. It was beautiful.

Then ol' lumpy butt showed up. Imagine my disappointment and how jarring it was going from the highs of the E38 and that rendering to the E65. I'll see if I can find on the interwebs.

The idea for BMW in 1996, in studying the Asian and U.S. markets tastes towards the W140 from late 1991 to early 1996, was to make a product that stood head and shoulders above it, with the most modern automotive technology ever made within it. They wanted a big, imposing machine as a flagship that surpassed the lean and athletic design of the E38, that favoured classic BMW.

In the end by mid-1998, the board was likely convinced that conservatism was not the best way to showcase imposing and revolution was the way to go, after hearing unwarranted criticisms against the evolutionary E46 (like E38, E39). The E65 sold like a gangbusters in Asian and U.S. markets for that reason in the early 2000s, as the W220 tried to copy the tenets of the E38 and suffered for it. While Audi charted its own path with some E38 influences for the D3 A8 and took over some of BMW's previous E38 customer base dissatisfied with the proportions of the E65.

I am going to look for it, but there were various ideas for the E65, but I don't have them. Here are some of them, plus an interesting comment in retrospect, on what expectations were for the E65 back in 1999.

BMW E65 7-Series Ideation Sketch - Adrian Van Hooydonk 1997
E65 Sketch AvH 1997.webp

E65 7er Ideation Sketch - Adrian van Hooydonk 1998

E65 Sketch AvD 1998 2-1.webp
E65 Sketch AvD 1998.webp
E65 Sketch AvD 1998 3.webp


E65 7er Rear Ideation Sketch - Adrian van Hooydonk 1998
7erback.webp


E65 7er Production Front Sketch - Adrian van Hooydonk 1999


P0006096.webp

Autobild Magazine (Or maybe Automobile Magazine?) - 1998

2001-7-S-Retrob.webp


E65 Rendering 1998 - Deutsch Stern Magazine

bmw72bcol.webp
bmw71bcol.webp


E65 Rendering - Auto und Motor Sport (Juli 1999 edition)

amstitlebmwe65c.webp
amsinsbmwe65c.webp


E65 Rendering - Autobild (3 März 2000 edition)


abe65tit380.webp
abe65rearcg380.webp


Which was based on these spy shots taken in February 2000.

abe65front380.webp abe65rear380.webp

Commentary on these spy shots (excl. Feb. 2000)

Besides the fact that the above graphics for "Auto Bild" appeared first in an American car magazine
and not in "Auto Bild" it's interesting how much the computer designer's impressions differ only
roughly two years before the presentation of the car. Additionally its remarkable that currently no spy-photos of the "real" beast are available.
There are strong rumours that BMW will introduce a retro-design 2002 and I wonder how much that influenced Mr. Huckfeldt`s graphics respectively the information it is based on. The retro-design
features a big front grille, the rear side window shows similarities to 1960`s BMW's and the waist-line does, too.
In my very personal point of view the retro-design is more attractive than the "modern" design variant
from "Stern" as it more clearly shows the vehicle is a BMW.
Anyway, in the past BMW was much criticized for the relatively slight changes in design with new car series and so it would seem logical the design of the new 7-Series will differ much more from it's predecessor.

10 July 1999 Comment

I have to express my personal feeling about the next 7 (and it seems to be a much more common opinion).
The better-looking shape by far is the one which appeared in Stern magazine and not the weirdo shape which was published in Automobile.
Furthermore, I (and many other BMW owners and lovers) feel that the best shape published so far is the one which appeared in Autocar 21/1/98 (See Mercedes vs. BMW tussle).
Moreover, we think that BMW should change its attitude with the new 7 and produce the 7 with wheel arches which are integrated into the flank and not swollen (like the one seen on the new Z8 or the 8 series). We fell it's a much cleaner design.
We also want to see that the next-generations (especially the 2001 7 series) won't have unnecessary creases and finally, we much prefer the back lights treatment of the current 5 series to the one of the latest 3 (We don't like L-shaped lights).
Furthermore, we prefer to see the tail low (as on the 5) and not high (as on the latest 3) and we don't like the downward sweep of the boot (as on the 3; opposed to the 5) and prefer to see a "straight" boot as on the current 5.
We also prefer the front treatment of the car published in Stern which is much cleaner and more macho.
Most of all, however, we are glad that all of the body panels will be colour-coded, namely all will be of the same colors (as opposed to the current 7).
We also wait for a very long version of the next 7 which will compete with the Maybach.
That's it. I expressed some of our thoughts (and deeply hope BMW will use them; if you could somehow acknowledge them we will be thankful).
We wanted to express our deep appreciation for this site. Really cool and original (as opposed to the most which are boring).

18 July 1999


That first picture (Auto und Motor Sport rendering) on the 7-series page looks like a mildly modified current 7-series, if not a step-back in design. How will BMW (with a rep for making "The Ultimate Driving Machine") make people choose a new-generation 7-series like the latest prototypes (these are NOT prototypes, just renderings) shown over a shiny new S-Class (bigger, well-poised, with a more appealing, more aggressive design, etc.)? The 7-series exterior design is already outdated. Another face-lift would further age it. I say, scrap the current design. Keep a few charactaristic touches, but modernize them! Although Automobile Magazine's idea of what the next model will look like was laughable to the rest of the world, it showed that the American public preferred a more tight-fitting exterior over a more traditional European design. Automobile Mag's idea so far beats all the others (especially the latest from Auto Motor und Sport) as far as modern designs go. With another face-lift, the 7-series would be targeting the same buyers it has been for many years. To make money, a car company should always search for ways to target a new age-group.

19 July 1999

We appreciate your publishing of our thoughts of the next 7 series.
In seems to us that the new pics (published in Automotorundsport) represent a MUCH cleaner design than the ones which were published so far. very satisfying. Overall, the design is clean and impressive.
A shame, though, about some small details which we find inflict this harmonious design:
First and foremost, the wheel arches: it's high time somebody told BMW to stop making their saloons with swollen arch wheels: Imagine yourself the same design with the arch wheels of the Z8 (or of the S class, for that matter): Namely, BMW should use "integrated", small arch wheels when the front one is at the same height as the back one. It will also be a new (more original) approach and make the design more symmetric. Apart from that, we feel that the "extra" light on the bonnet is unnecessary. BMW should drop that extra "ornament".
And finally, we feel that a 7 series should be once offered with a "no-chrome" option, as on the M5.
All in all, though, this design is the best so far of the 7 series (finally- good spy shots of the 7!).
We are glad that there will be an air suspension plus the famous aluminium chassis (hopefully a 4 link in front).
We should hope for a long-wheel-version which will be very big and imposing as to compete with the might of the Maybach and (BMW's-owned) Rolls-Royce.
And may we add that the design of the boot (straight, not high, not downward-sweeping, as we have wanted) is also great.
We'd also want the windows to be a mite bigger (for better visibility) but that's it.
May BMW offer as an option bumpers which cover the exhaust pipes, it will contribute to the already clean design (and thank god they haven't introduced a "bonnet grill " for draining water which might have defected the clean design of the bonnet).
We hope (again) that you will publish our reaction (and if you could, somehow, make BMW design department know what we all want).
 
bmw72bcol-jpg.webp


That's the render I was talking about. I remember it being less awkward and even sleeker. That was my hope for the next 7er at that time.

That midnighr blue looks good, though extended wheelbase at that time and the generation after was definitely ungainly. That critique applies to the S and A8 of those eras as well.
 
There was another thing that greatly influenced the development of the E65. At the beginning it was supposed to fight for the title of the most luxurious car in the world, but than by an accident they aquired Rolls-Royce(only the brand) and the 7er should no more carry this fight
 
bmw72bcol-jpg.webp


That's the render I was talking about. I remember it being less awkward and even sleeker. That was my hope for the next 7er at that time.

That midnighr blue looks good, though extended wheelbase at that time and the generation after was definitely ungainly. That critique applies to the S and A8 of those eras as well.

Really, this one? Understandably the car was a mystery back then, but I actually found it to be too derivative of the E46. It really needs some cleaning up, even just as a vision. The 1998 Autobild rendering and AMS renderings I found to be much better, even though AMS cheated and benefited from info on a frozen design, versus one either in progress (dependent on month in 1998) or barely approved.

The rear of the 2000 Autobild rendering, would've made for an excellent design, with some more modern rear taillight graphics.

As for ungainly proportions LWB, I see your point. All of the automakers of large luxury sedans, were indeed guilty of it. Jaguar's XJ X308 also had this issue, in the LWB being a last minute addition to the X300 line-up in May 1995 after 1994 launch. And because X308 was just a refreshed X300, which was already a rebodied XJ40. Development of LWB variants was approached as an afterthought, like coachwork. Just a little better that coachbuilders, in being an OEM effort.

There was another thing that greatly influenced the development of the E65. At the beginning it was supposed to fight for the title of the most luxurious car in the world, but than by an accident they aquired Rolls-Royce(only the brand) and the 7er should no more carry this fight

Yes, that is exactly what the plan was. (y) The purchase of RR did indeed affect it, but the E65 did end up quite bulky looking, which has become a defining and relating characteristic between the E65, F01, and G11.

@Carmaker1, your in depth insights into these historical development stories is truly incredible and appreciated..


Well, thank you. It's always good to share what you learn or rediscover with as many people as possible, that might have interest in the same thing. In my early days on GCF as an ME student and Jag intern, I learned a lot from this forum and I want to return the favour.
 
I remember the gestation period of the E65 vividly.
I don't have enough time at the moment, but I will share my thoughts and experiences about its development in the next day or so.
To understand where the car was heading - you only have to look at some ideas as the E60 such as dramatic character line that splits the upper half of the car and indeed this sketch which has early ideas including the tall kidney Grille which was then thought of as a visual statement to elevate the 7er from other BMW models and indeed over its competitors. Unfortunately that did not sit well with Dr Reitzle. Interesting that 20-so years later we are seeing these ideas returning in a similar capacity.
Even so there was an even more Avantgarde proposal. Even more so than the E65. Which in conceptual form eventually became the beginnings of the Rolls-Royce Phantom.
 

BMW

Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, abbreviated as BMW is a German multinational manufacturer of luxury vehicles and motorcycles headquartered in Munich, Bavaria, Germany. The company was founded in 1916 as a manufacturer of aircraft engines, which it produced from 1917 to 1918 and again from 1933 to 1945.
Official website: BMW (Global), BMW (USA)

Trending content


Back
Top