Charger Hellcat vs. Cadillac CTS-V


For what the Cadillac lacks in straight line speed compared to the Hellcat it more than makes up in luxury and handling finesse. Cadillac please.

M
 
Both great mega saloons, but the Caddi is the better all round car, it will beat a Hellcat on a racetrack for sure, but straight line speed it loses out 640hp against 707hp. It would be nice to check a dual with these 2 and the E63 AMG S and BMW M5 30th yare version.
 
It would be nice to check a dual with these 2 and the E63 AMG S and BMW M5 30th yare version.

The M5 30th Yare is such a rare machine I wouldn`t even bother comparing.
The M5 CP is more than enough. I believe however both E63s and M5cp would be had for lunch by the new CTS-V and Hellcat in a drag race, especially around 100mph or better.
 
Not a fan of them both but the Hellcat looks boring for 700 hp car so it's caddy for me.
 
The M5 30th Yare is such a rare machine I wouldn`t even bother comparing.
The M5 CP is more than enough. I believe however both E63s and M5cp would be had for lunch by the new CTS-V and Hellcat in a drag race, especially around 100mph or better.
The E63 AMG S has been timed at 7.6sec to 160km/h by Autozeitung which is slightly faster than the Hellcat (7.9sec by Autobild Sportscars) and also to 200km/h both achieved 11.8sec by Autobild Sportscars. The CTS-V was timed at 8.1sec to 160km/h and 12.3sec to 200km/h by Sport Auto, while the M5 (standard 560PS) version was timed at 8.2sec to 160km/h and 12.4sec to 200km/h by Auto Motor und Sport. So I don't think the CTS-V and Hellcat will have them for lunch, it will be closer than we all think!!:)
 
^
Impressive, however it would be fair if the vehicles were tested
under equal conditions. The overall results might be a little different.
 
ok, the hellcat may have 707hp, but what it has on power, it lacks on refinement... the interior is just cheap... CTS for me!
 

Thread statistics

Created
GTA45E,
Last reply from
JohnnyP1997,
Replies
9
Views
1,737

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top