I am only stating what has actually happened. LFA HAS actually matched SLS AMG in AutoZeitung and Car magazine tests, but AutoZeitung pointed out LFA required a lot of tries before they got the perfect run while SLS using launch control ran the same everytime. The launch control is what makes the SLS AMG win 9/10 times since LFA torches the tires.
Every reviewer has pointed out including AutoZeitung and SportAuto. In American tests, LFA got 11.8 secs without any launch control while SLS AMG got 11.5 secs with launch control on its best run. LFA is 300 pounds lighter and has better power to weight ratio so I don't see how it should not be atleast as quick or quicker.
Just a car without any way of proper launching is simply unfair to be compared to a car with a great launch control. Is it not??
Now it could be seen in how LFA beat the mid-11 seconds R8 V10 to 100 mph that proves LFA with launch control is very quick in a straight line. Without launch control, LFA does not stand a chance with AWD and a good R-tronic launch control on R8 V10 and 400 ft-lbs going to all wheels.
Although, they came out in different times and about 5 years apart, if you look at all their handling numbers, but since you pointed it out:
Carrera GT:
LFA:
Again, not a fair comparison since LFA is 6 years newer (so is 458 Italia and so are other cars) and they really should not be compared, but since you are comparing it to the LFA so just have to point it out. I would not normally compare these cars since there is no head to head available on them Back in 2004 around a race track, nothing could touch it.
p.s. Upon seeing the AutoBild comparison and the 7'38" lap times, Lexus Europe responded by confirming on twitter that currently LFA is lapping the Nurburgring in the "low 7'20"". The exact figure is still pending and said the Nurburgring edition will be faster than the race car LFA since it will have 572 PS and weigh the same as the race car LFA. Again, just trying to give an update on what is happening. Don't throw a hissy fit on me.
Every reviewer has pointed out including AutoZeitung and SportAuto. In American tests, LFA got 11.8 secs without any launch control while SLS AMG got 11.5 secs with launch control on its best run. LFA is 300 pounds lighter and has better power to weight ratio so I don't see how it should not be atleast as quick or quicker.
Just a car without any way of proper launching is simply unfair to be compared to a car with a great launch control. Is it not??
Now it could be seen in how LFA beat the mid-11 seconds R8 V10 to 100 mph that proves LFA with launch control is very quick in a straight line. Without launch control, LFA does not stand a chance with AWD and a good R-tronic launch control on R8 V10 and 400 ft-lbs going to all wheels.
Going by what you're saying with LC the LFA would be able to match the SLS. again, as I pointed out before, you speculate way too much about how LC will affect the car, and what the results will be. Im sure there will be more tests of the LFA and more importantly, Im sure we will get owners testing their cars (I hope they are enthusiastic enough about their car to drive it and want to share their experience with others)
Although, they came out in different times and about 5 years apart, if you look at all their handling numbers, but since you pointed it out:
Carrera GT:
LFA:
Again, not a fair comparison since LFA is 6 years newer (so is 458 Italia and so are other cars) and they really should not be compared, but since you are comparing it to the LFA so just have to point it out. I would not normally compare these cars since there is no head to head available on them Back in 2004 around a race track, nothing could touch it.
p.s. Upon seeing the AutoBild comparison and the 7'38" lap times, Lexus Europe responded by confirming on twitter that currently LFA is lapping the Nurburgring in the "low 7'20"". The exact figure is still pending and said the Nurburgring edition will be faster than the race car LFA since it will have 572 PS and weigh the same as the race car LFA. Again, just trying to give an update on what is happening. Don't throw a hissy fit on me.
Maybe Im not making my point clear (seemingly im not), that I understand how volume is the main determinant of unit price. It is for the LFA, Reventon and bang/buck cars like the Z06.
Yet when I look at the article posted in the other thread, with the LFA longside the SLS, 458, LP570 etc, the car fits right in. Next to cars like the LP670 or Carrera GT, it just wouldnt fit in.
Why do I love the LFA? because the car is very well made and a great first attempt by Toyota. It sounds amazing and looks pretty good too. I love all cars and even if I prefer a LP570 to a 458 doesnt mean I dont like the 458. I love the Reventon but its got no place next to a Veyron for comparison. As such I love the LFA, but its got no place next to top of the line Ferraris and Lambos.