RikfromBelgium
Das Beste Enthusiast
- Messages
- 1,761
I love how MB fans are raving on about the C63 and how hardcore it is and how M3 fans are flipping when euh, attention... It still came second after the M3 in this test.
Vs Car & Driver: RS4 vs C63 vs M3
- Thread starter PC Valkyrie
- Start date
Vehicle comparisons, matchups, debates, performance battles, and head-to-head discussions.
cawimmer430
Piston Pioneer
- Messages
- 14,806
- Name
- Christian Alexander Wimmer
yes its intresting. I remember all those previous fanboys discussion around the net, including our board. Reason why most people on car boards picked the C55 over M3 becuase the AMG had better comfort . Now that cant be used as an argument anymore and logically AMG fans should pick the M3 since it now offer better comfort than C AMGI wonder how many of them still pick C AMG
I'm sure the C63 AMG still has a massive appeal to AMG customrs, especially those that always wished for something more "hardcore".
PC Valkyrie
Headlight Hero
- Messages
- 1,092
PC Valkyrie
Headlight Hero
- Messages
- 1,092
It seems that the C63 is going to eat M3s for breakfast.
I think you're right, when you're talking about driving on everday streets.
In the E36 M3 era, the M3 was faster than the C36 and C43 in straight line acceleration. In the E46 M3 era, the C32/C55 were about the same or slightly faster than the M3 in terms of straight line acceleration. With the C63, I think this is the first time ever that the C-AMG car is SO MUCH faster than the M3 in straight line acceleration.
So for the majority of drivers who don't drive on a track, the C63 likely will leave the M3 in the dust on everday roads (IF the C&D test is reflective of the truth). That may be a harder pill for M3 owners to swallow, because no matter how good the M3 feels, getting blown away decisively doesn't make for a good feeling. It'll be interesting if M5board invites a C63 into their airfield straight line contests in the future......I bet the C63 will be faster than the M3 from any rolling speed.
RikfromBelgium
Das Beste Enthusiast
- Messages
- 1,761
haha, again: are we forgetting it still LOST to the M3.
And since when is straightline performance something new for AMG's. it's the way they've been thinking for years.
And since when is straightline performance something new for AMG's. it's the way they've been thinking for years.
a 3.9 sprint is an amazing time-GT3 status in fact. I really like the C63 but i do find the styling a bit crass-which seems highlights the character of the car's driving dynamics-aggressive and fast. Its a bit too "night clubish" for my taste but nonetheless a pretty damn sweet ride.
Glad to see the M3 take its victory and perhaps a hope that BMW hasnt lost sight of the important aspects of this car.
Glad to see the M3 take its victory and perhaps a hope that BMW hasnt lost sight of the important aspects of this car.
bum-man
Driving Dynamics Pro
- Messages
- 3,567
- Messages
- 41,227
- Name
- Marcus
Lets us not forget that Car and Driver's 0-60 times are the lowest/fastest in the industry. I'd wait to see what other magazines get before taking a 3.9 0-60 time as gospel. The brake-torque method was made for cars like the C63 so in the right hands this method will produce truly heroic 0-60 times. That said, my real concern is all this about the stiff ride/suspension. Very unusual. I'd wait until a U.S. magazine tests all U.S. spec cars to see if our cars will be as stiff. I can almost see it now when Car and Driver does a comparo between the IS-F, C63, RS4, and M3 Sedan on U.S. soil. The finishing order won't likely be the same.
M
M
- Messages
- 13,235
I wouldn't be surprised to see them fill up the tires with cement over there.
Yeah since the M5board owns and races all the cars you see at the events they organize, I am sure they will have no problem doing that. May be you should organize an event where you can fill up M car's fuel tanks with sand.
Zafiro
Supreme Roadmaster
- Messages
- 30,820
all cars are invited, its the owners that need to say hi.
Im just back from a M5board.com event and let me give you a warning. Watch out for stage 2 335i in a race, if M6 can be surprised than you can be sure of that a C63 wont be superior, those tuned 335i are deadly. I say no more, let the videos speak for themselves.
GrimReaper
Schwarzwald Sprinter
- Messages
- 199
I honestly believe this argument is becoming rather redundant/moot. No longer are Mercedes and Audi behind in this field and no longer is BMW the absolute winner. Yes BMW has better handling still and its still the more "fun" car but everyone crying about that Mercedes and Audi being crap or even the other way round is rather pointless. The only thing that can be said objectively is that you don't like the looks of some particular car and that they're utter crap (which is again pushing it since the M3 looks gorgeous and the C63 looks brutal). The handling characteristics, drivetrain, chassis, etc. seem perfect for each car and we should be happy that everyone has three different choices and its not even compromising if you choose one over the other.
This is just one test and there will be thousands others where the Merc will be the winner and another thousand where the M3 reigns supreme. People should just grow up and stop fighting over how XYZ car won in this one comparo so MY brand > YOUR brand.
/rant
About the test, I've always taken C&D's 0-60 times with a grain of salt because they always have the best 0-60 times and are almost always rather completely unrealistic which makes me believe they're probably taking their times downhill. and Kudos to the M3 for taking a win.
This is just one test and there will be thousands others where the Merc will be the winner and another thousand where the M3 reigns supreme. People should just grow up and stop fighting over how XYZ car won in this one comparo so MY brand > YOUR brand.
/rant
About the test, I've always taken C&D's 0-60 times with a grain of salt because they always have the best 0-60 times and are almost always rather completely unrealistic which makes me believe they're probably taking their times downhill. and Kudos to the M3 for taking a win.
Or ranting?
- Messages
- 13,235
Couldn't agree more with you. This segment has gone mainstream (and in no small part cause of previous M3's sales success) and most premium manufacturers (including Lexus) has a presence in this segment now. And just like you won't find much between a vanilla 3er, C, A4 and IS, you won't find much difference in this segment either. I think, going forward, CSL/BS/<what ever Audi comes up with> is going to be the new special versions of these cars for the demanding few.
- Messages
- 41,227
- Name
- Marcus
They use the brake-torque method, which of course suits a Benz much better than most.
M
PC Valkyrie
Headlight Hero
- Messages
- 1,092
Rik, turn off the fanboy mode and re-read my last post. This is the FIRST time the C-AMG car may be SIGNIFICANTLY faster than the M3 in terms of acceleration (assuming the difference in acceleration times between the C63 and M3 is real).
And yes, the M3 won this comparison. It appears to be the better track weapon AND daily driver in terms of comfort. Like I said before, I probably prefer the M3 over the C63 for personal reaons. All I'm saying is the C63 will likely win most street encounters with the M3 because of its accelerating superiority. And for 95% of people, the street is the only place these cars will be driven on. And even on a track, I doubt there will be a huge difference in laptimes. In fact, I suspect that the average non-pro driver on the track will be faster in a C63 than the M3 because the AMG car is easier to drive fast. Why do I say that?.......because I've passed E46 M3's with my W203 C55 on the track (the only E46 M3's that have passed me were modified ones or ones with R-compound tires).
PC Valkyrie
Headlight Hero
- Messages
- 1,092
Once you include modified cars, it's a whole different ball game. I doubt a stock E92 M3 will out accelerate the W204 C63.
The 335i is a super fast car if properly modified because it's so easy to increase boost on the turbos.
Zafiro
Supreme Roadmaster
- Messages
- 30,820
I dont care much about that and I dont care if a tuned 335i does the same to a M3. Yesterday I drove the new M3. So what if C63 is faster. Doesnt make the M3 a slow car, in fact it's more than 95% of the population can handle. The car is so well balanced and easy to control, even my old grandmother can drive fast with the new M3. I broke the speedlimit several times yesterday, 180km/h in third gear and if the police gets you, your license is gone.
There is tons of grip and you can take a bend faster than you thought what was possible. You can drive superfast without anything goes wrong, the car so wellbalanced and it's so easy to control. The new M3 is orgasmic.
I'm not worried if C63 beats you becuase there will always be someone faster than you. Heck, if I was worried to get beaten, well, a tuned Toyota Supra can cure that.
For me driving is more than just a straightline, its the total package that matters. M3 offer good comfort and is just as easy to live with as a 335i, in fact the suspension is better than a 335i thanks to the adjustable suspension.
For the price of the M3 its hard to find another car that do so much great as the M3 does for you. No longer can you use the excuse that the M3 is to harsh for you to live with. Top on that you mix the M3 with a dose of acceleration, tons of grip and tons of driving pleasure. And let's not forget, the M3 is beautiful car to look at too.
It's really that good!
So, M3 or a C63? which is the best? None I would say, they are both good. Highreeving concept or big block concept? it comes down to details which one you choose and you cant go wrong with neither of them.
Oh, with the new DCT gearbox the M3 will get even better, Im sure of it.
With track driving, the variable of driver skill plays a larger role; I've seen relatively mundane cars that shouldn't have stood a chance against more exotic machinery...and yet they have.
On a perfectly smooth track, the new C AMG might be easier to drive fast. But throw in some bumpy corners and that average non-pro driver might feel more comfortable at the limit with the more supple M3.
These figures surprised me quite a bit. With all the fuss about the M3 suddenly having gotten fat and losing the plot, I'm surprised more isn't made about the C-Class AMG's considerably higher weight gain.
Also surprising:
Steering Feel / Handling / Ride ratings
M3: 5 / 10 / 9
C63: 4 / 8 / 6
RS4: 4 / 8 / 9
The Audi is still impressively competitive among this newer group.
I agree the 4-door M3 would be a more appropriate competitor to these two. The points it would lose in performance would probably be made up in points gained for better rear-seat/trunk space. And granted, this is only one result of many more to come.
cawimmer430
Piston Pioneer
- Messages
- 14,806
- Name
- Christian Alexander Wimmer
Rik, don't even think about provoking a war here.
Car and Driver is known to also love BMWs to death. I am not saying that the M3 didn't deserve the win, but there are tons of factors, not only the capabilities and performance of the car, that decide the outcome. One of them is editor opinion.
"Lost" is such a strong word. I don't think the C63 AMG "lost" to the M3, nor did the RS4 in that sense. Besides, the M3 finished with 212 points, the Mercedes with 205 and the Audi with 201. Overall it was pretty close actually.
View attachment e33d2d955f9fd6323142e3bd822444cf.jpg
View attachment ecddd26c8267a7ec42c70bcff454df25.jpg
View attachment c8802a4d2af2ee4cf60c11fc2c0ce88a.jpg
Similar threads
- Article
