2014 E-Class f/l design discussion and alternate impression exercise


GTA45E

Premium+
Premium
I would like to use this thread to point out how the designers at Mercedes missed it with the face/lift of the E, E63. How thay were so inconsistent with it`s design DNA. (I have used my own art impression to point out certain details of the front end…(if you like, you can to..) With a piece of paper and pencil, I had a little fun coming up with this quick rough.
Rough, meaning it` s only a short study in consistency with design work. Remember, there are a million ways to do this. I don`t know about anyone else but my personal theroy would be neutrality and coherency.
f06cee0cd22566951bf103f42f9774f7.webp

32225a705c658bf1273aa3c2b98e3fa5.webp

In this rough, I took the quads of the preface-lifted E-Class and brought the lenses in the headlight graphics closer together while making them slightly smaller and more mature looking, maintaining a level of Mercedes prestige and power. Using abstract language, I tried to make the headlights look like serious eyes with a more focused, buttoned down look and feel compared the eyes of the face/lifted E-Class the Merc designers used,( which are very fussy, poorly resolved and wonder out of focus to the human eye). The round headlight shape of the face/lift E is clearly inconsistent with it`s angular blue-print design. To me they look cock-eyed and fragmented in direct sunlight, from a head on view with those silly double-eye brows and tears.

858c9f247db2a66763d0449f0c94e295.webp

The whole front end of the f/l E, (E63) is broken up pretty bad imo. It`s like Gorden said “look, I want my designers to be in separate rooms this time. The headlight designers in room A. The front bumper designers in room B. Don`t be running to my office for suggestions. Absolutely no talking among yourselves and no phone calls, not even outside my building. Now go, go!!”

l eliminated the meaningless double eyebrows and tears which look bug-eyed and alien imo. I added a single eyebrow over each eye for a more unified coherent look. (I wish to God the designers at Mercedes would have done this.) I also included slightly stronger outlines to the headlights, tying ends with the angular design language of the current E-Class.
The sports-car grill of the f/l E63 AMG has soft edges in design which again, is inconsistent to me. This grill is definitely more suited to the Merc coupes and sports car line where it should stay. It simply does not fit the status of the Mercedes 4-door cars.

Also, the lower air-dams of the f/l E63 are very square in shape with rounded soft edges that do not tie into the design language of the current E63. This packaging is too blocky, mixed up and is not attractive. (very untidy, polarizing design work imo.) So in this rough I took away the sports-car grill and added a more V shaped traditional grill with sharper edges. I also added more “A- frame” graphic in the outer lower air-dam openings with sharper cut-lines to again, tie-ends with the angular design language of the W212 E-Class. I tried to make these affects glorify the grill as the elements are pointing towards it.
These affects automatically cut down the blocky look and I believe, blend a little better with the current styling language of the E63. My idea here is to neutralize the front end with the rest of the car (no matter what schemes I use). This is my own personal theory though. If you feel differently and like what Mercedes has done feel free to state your opinions.

My main question in this short study is, why did the Mercedes designers not pay attention to details of the current E-Class and why did Gorden let the messy details of the new face/lift slip through his fingers. It`s quit obvious and unbelievable, and this is coming from a professional design studio.

Also, do you believe my scetch would be good enough to fit on the W212 E-Class face/lift. Thanks for your feedback.
 
I agree with you .. I like the Pre FL angular front more.
I love the W212..and its in no way ugly with this FL, but its gone soft, and i hate the Avantgarde grill..
Its to small so it makes the whole car look narrower.. and thus as a car that belongs to a class below.

Oh i should mention that i saw it in the flesh for the first time yesterday at the dealers, also saw the CLA.
Ive been giving it shit for its looks, its actually a very neat little coupe.
And i do not get the BS about the interior of the A/CLA.. looks and feels amazing to me:)
 
Thanks klier!

I wish it did to... The designers at MB really goofed up the E pretty bad I think.

Totally agree LaArtist.. I still don`t like the headlights of the face/lifted E though.
Thay look terrible imo.
 
GTA, we disagree many things about design, but I absolutely, completely, violently agree with you on this one. I also love your sketch, perhaps minus the "horizontal" bars crossing the headlights. IMO, Mercedes biggest design problem these days are the headlights.... they're over designed and laboured.
 
If the E remained angular it would have been completely out of step with the rest of the lineup.

I actually think the angular pre-fl E, without the AMG sports pack, is looking pretty dated at the moment. An overly sharp nose with an effete lower bumper, ridiculously exaggerated wedge profile and high bum, it's not looking good to me. It may resolve itself better over time, but at the moment in the face of all the organic fluidity going around, it looks completely out of step, even within the Benz portfolio. The AMG pack is an absolute must have of the pre FL E, to bring it all together. IMO the FL was needed, particularly for the base models.
 
^well it would have been no bother to me if it was not as the rest of the line up..
But you are right about the non AMG one..

I always think about the AMG pre FL..and that face is unbeatable:)

Screen shot 2013-03-12 at 2.43.10 AM.webp
 
Mercedes biggest desing problem these days are the headlights.... they're over designed and laboured.

Agree!
As I stated above the main problem with the f/l E is it double eyebrows over the quads. It`s the only
model with them. The new S-Class also has quads, but with single eyebrows. Imagine how bad it would look with double eyebrows!

If the E remained angular it would have been completely out of step with the rest of the lineup.

Thay designed it that way. Adding organic shapes to angular themes just don`t work imo. The E-Class should have been in touch with its orignal blue-print on this f/l. The designers missed it. (The GLK is also an angular design and so is the currenct C-Class.)
 
Agree!
As I stated above the main problem with the f/l E is it double eyebrows over the quads. It`s the only
model with them. The new S-Class also has quads, but with single eyebrows. Imagine how bad it would look with double eyebrows!

For sure, but still on the S class there is a non sense, empty space over the eyebrow, in the area which meets the grill...

Thay designed it that way. Adding organic shapes to angular themes just don`t work imo. The E-Class should have been in touch with its orignal blue-print on this f/l. The designers missed it. (The GLK is also an angular design and so is the currenct C-Class.)

Agreed. The e class in order to have coherence with the rest of the line up, lost coherence with itself. The angular and soft scheme doesn't go together well.
 
Agree!
As I stated above the main problem with the f/l E is it double eyebrows over the quads. It`s the only
model with them. The new S-Class also has quads, but with single eyebrows. Imagine how bad it would look with double eyebrows!



Thay designed it that way. Adding organic shapes to angular themes just don`t work imo. The E-Class should have been in touch with its orignal blue-print on this f/l. The designers missed it. (The GLK is also an angular design and so is the currenct C-Class.)


I agree with you about the lack of coherency between the angularity of the vehicle and the organic forms that have been grafted on. In hindsight the W212 E should have never been as angular as it was, given the more organic and fluid design that was in the pipeline. The w204 should have represented the peak of that design idiom because it perfectly walks the line between the angularity and organic.

Something was amiss in MB's design department and overall direction back then. There is far more consistency in the models coming out now.
 
The official launch of the facelifted E for Hong Kong is the 16th May 2013. There will be a launch event held at the Convention Centre. But the dealer told me they already have couple of them upstairs in the carpark if I want to have a look.

Will see if it looks better in metal.
 
^
Good luck!
I actually saw the f/l E back in March at our local auto-show. The elements of the headlights do seem to come together
better in the metal by themselves. I still did not feel that thay fit the E. My friend (not into cars like I am) said it looked
like a Honda. Of course I did not agree...

016f336fbafe384119cc7b5747471775.webp

270164e422278ab8e1a208e86ddbfdf1.webp
 
The official launch of the facelifted E for Hong Kong is the 16th May 2013. There will be a launch event held at the Convention Centre. But the dealer told me they already have couple of them upstairs in the carpark if I want to have a look.

Will see if it looks better in metal.
They better do it well in order to ensure that the e remains the best seller for the year
 
The next E will be more cohesive from the start, I hope. This is going to happen again with the SL and ML facelifts which are needed according to some withing Mercedes who don't like the way they look. According to something posted in another thread back during the K/A days. The SL I can believe but I don't see anything wrong with the ML myself. Can't wait to see how they try to fix the front end on the SL, specificially the non AMG models.

M
 
^
It`s going to be interesting to see how the next E turns out. It will indeed adopt the anti-wedge shape and dropping line.
I however don`t want to see the angular theme go. When done right there is a since of power in it... this falls on who can play with lines and shapes to get it right.

I believe it was Gianclaudio who said sometime back, after the CLS MB went down-hill with headlights...
eye-brows too big on SL exc exc... to an extent I agree. (The SL needs a make-over and the ML is rather dull)
 
Back
Top