Auto Express: Ferrari 458 Italia vs McLaren MP4-12C


Guibo

Autobahn Explorer
Short track comparo at Anglesey Circuit. McLaren is on optional carbon brakes and looks to be optional lightweight alloys too.

Ferrari vs McLaren track test | Videos | Auto Express

MP4-12C - laptime 0:59.3
good front-end grip, a bit more unstable under brakes, can really feel Brake Steer working in tight corners, many mentions of ABS (too intrusive?), not as good brake feel, gearchange not as characterful as the Ferrari's

458 - laptime 0:59.2
glorious engine, amazing acceleration, wonderfully engaging handling, amazing brakes, a little softer in turns than the MP4-12C but that helps with chassis feel
 
Very close especially considering the McLaren was on PZeros (non-Corsa), which are nowhere near as good as MPSSs. Not really a great track for testing supercars on however - too short, no straights. More suited to lesser powered cars. Looks like Auto Express had more luck with the 458 this year than in 2010 where the SLS beat it by a second on the same track (1:00.6 SLS vs 1:01.6 458).
 
My IRL experience with the Mclaren @ JIMS

IRL it's easier understanding the suspension, what a jewel:t-cheers:
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0111.webp
  • IMAG0112.webp
  • IMAG0113.webp
  • IMAG0114.webp
Looks like Auto Express had more luck with the 458 this year than in 2010 where the SLS beat it by a second on the same track (1:00.6 SLS vs 1:01.6 458).

The actual time of 458 from the last year was 60,1s. It was faster than SLS just like in any other test so far. There was a mistake in the video, which showed 1:01,6. This time 458 improved by 0,9s to 59,2s likely thanks to Super Sport tires.
 
Evo improved also 1s
Even so ferrari claims some imprvoments for 458 coupé MY11, not just about (the very good) new tyres.

"The Ferrari range

Lining up alongside the 458 Spider is the entire Ferrari range, including the 458 Italia, the maximum expression of an extreme, high-performance driving experience. Today the V8 berlinetta is even more sporty.

New control software for the magnetorheological dampers improves body control, enhancing the feedback in sporty driving.

With the manettino in RACE - in other words, at the highest level of performance with all the dynamic vehicle control systems still engaged - an evolved software for the F1 dual-clutch transmission makes gearchanges even more decisive, while there’s even faster acceleration out of bends thanks to an improved calibration of the F1-Trac traction control. "

and I'm pretty sure they also improved the 458 in late 2010: in the first road tests in spring-2010 (QR, Sport Auto, Top Gear) the 458 was as fast as the 430S, in late 2010 (Autocar, Auto (It) ) was already faster.
I'm sure the 458'll cut at least 1s @ Vairano (Club 4 seconds 2011 is coming, next week9
 
The actual time of 458 from the last year was 60,1s. It was faster than SLS just like in any other test so far. There was a mistake in the video, which showed 1:01,6. This time 458 improved by 0,9s to 59,2s likely thanks to Super Sport tires.
Oh well 1:01.6 seems to be the time that everywhere quotes including Auto Express. Don't think much of their timing if that's the case.

Wonder if this MP4 had the suspension tweaks of the one that ran on TG and Hockenheim. Apparently they did a lot of tweaks after the initial Evo test following complaints. I know the yellow/orange press car has them but I think this black one is one of the original cars that 5th gear tested. Who knows. A tenth is too close to call from a magazine test, so pretty much neck-and-neck.
 
Here is the article from the last PCOTY contest.

The chart below mentions laptime of 60,1s and 2.ranking. The 1:01,6 laptime doesn´t make sense at all, it is not in line with article (which mentions 458 being second fastest after GT3 RS) and not in line with like 30 other tests, as 458 is always faster than SLS.

Ferrari 458 Italia | Performance Car of the Year | Auto Express

Autoexpress also clocked the 458 best ever 60-100mph acceleration of 3,3s.
 
Hmmm. Doesn't explain why the video says 1:01.6. How odd. Maybe the 60.1 was after the Ferrari engineers came along. I know they gained over a second in the Autocar test at Donington by making tweaks according to Steve Sutcliffe.
 
As I said before... braking is the weakest point of the Macca.
I won't consider buying one... MP4-12C... not! The thrill factor is not good enough for a super car too :)
Any news on the Scuderia ?
Will it be launched 2 years after the standard one as it was the case with the F430 ?
 
As I said before... braking is the weakest point of the Macca.
I won't consider buying one... MP4-12C... not! The thrill factor is not good enough for a super car too :)
Any news on the Scuderia ?
Will it be launched 2 years after the standard one as it was the case with the F430 ?
spring 2012: New 599 GTB
late 2012: New Enzo
spring 2013: 458 Scuderia
 
Some interesting opinions from real people on the 12C:

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/other-british-cars/256150-test-drove-mp4-12c-today.html

Had an opportunity to test drive an MP4-12C today.

It is every bit as good as I imagined it would be and completely matched my expectations. I owned a 458 Italia for a bit... The McLaren is in direct competition with the Italia both on paper and as I found out today behind the wheel as well.

Blazing fast, feels just a tad faster than the Italia by the seat of the pants. Feels a bit less edgy and nervous and the few hundred lbs difference in the weight is noticeable. The MP4 is and feels a bit lighter.

Strangely enough, while it feels a bit more forgiving, softer sprung and more compliant, the MP4 feels just a tad more planted when pushed. The track mode is less stiff than the race mode in Italia overall but the MP4 feels more confidence inspiring. I drove the MP4 on the streets so of course all I can say relates to spirited driving on the street, not at 10/10 on the track.

Dual clutch tranny seems to be on par with the Italia. Brakes are stupendous just like the Italia.

Interior is quite nice and clutter free. Dihedral doors are cool and getting in and out is not as bad as it may look.

Steering is razor sharp with lots of feedback, IMHO, just as good as the Italia.

A really fun car to drive if not quite as stimulating in terms of cabin motor sound. The Italia puts an orchestra behind your head, it is a symphony of motor noises, the MP4 sounds great in track mode, especially at WOT but not quite as intoxicating or exotic.

I did like the MP4 better in person than pictures.

Overall, a fantastic car!

I drove the car today as well, simply unbelievable. Extremely well balanced and capable. The ergonomics are great and the car is comfortable at low speeds and so-so roads. My drive was a real eye-openner. Big hats off to the engineers at Mclaren. I echo the sentiments about the cars appearance is better in person. Coming from the Aston world, it's high praise to say that this car has an elegance that the Italians lack.

i have a buddy in the uk who owns a silver one, and his experience over a bit longer period of time basically confirms all of the above....quite comfortable and liveable for daily use, but with amazing performance and handling on tap whenever you want it....i hope to get a chance to drive his one day...
 
On the other hand, on Pistonheads, most of the owners are unsatisfied and a few have already decided to sell the car. The car has apparently lots of bugs and McLaren themselves don´t know when they are going to be fixed.

Well I own one and I think 'a few minor issues' is misleading at best. I have documented here the full list of things wrong with my car and spoke to other owners who have a near identical list. It's also worth repeating that as I write, Mclaren do not have a fix for a single one of these problems. To me, that's just not OK.

I'm happy to agree to disagree but I don't think I'm in the minority. I know two owners who aren't on PH who aren't happy and a third who has already backed his car because of the problems. Then there's the 3 of us mentioned above. So I know 6 in total who aren't happy, one who has already backed his car and two others who are in the process of doing the same.


This has been posted already :

Its unfortunately a bit more than software issues. My car is currently back with McLaren with a tech from the factory looking at the numerous non-software issues, and my business partners car was collected today, along with the software faults that all cars have, his has gone back for all hardware related faults/failures and paint defects.

Whilst the car is superb to drive and be in as a driving experience, the customer satisfaction experience still leaves room for improvement, which to be fair McLaren are working on. However, with the issues our two cars have (numerous stupid software faults aside, two of which keep putting my car in limp mode) have I do sometimes wonder what their test engineers were doing for 5+ years.


It's being collected tomorrow. I did try to live with it for another week or two after I posted that I was going to sell it but the problems just got worse and more frequent. On Saturday, at different times, I was told by the computer I had 4 punctures, the airbags weren't working, the air brake wasn't working, the air brake then got stuck, and the car told me that the passenger seat belt was not fastened even though no passenger was in the car.

Provided they get rid of the car quickly and I'm not out of pocket, I am prepared to give Mclaren and the dealer another chance at a later date, but I get a very strong sense from the people I talk to there, that whilst they hope to have some fixes in the next 2-3 weeks, they are a LONG way from fixes for all of this stuff and the fact that production has now stopped highlights just how far away they are.


MP4-12C photos and review/comparison
 
Interesting that he doesn't detail the hardware faults. The software faults are known about because they had a software contractor who turned out to be useless and they had to bin them at the last minute. Software issues are par for the course with new cars, I don't think a finished version of Windows has ever been released.

By comparison in Evo Issue 163 page 153, the newly acquired 458 has undergone 2 fuel sender faults, the first unit having been replaced and is currently also sufferring from a sticking exhaust valve and a misfire and the seat bolster is already torn. The side mirror glass also cracked from vibrations. Then you have the disco inferno variants. The 458 having been out several years, so I don't see it as a problem that an innovative new car is having some teething issues when longer-running competitors are still outstanding fixes. I'm sure the problems won't persist for as long as Porsche's RMS issue. Damn that must have been going for over a decade now.
 
Interesting that he doesn't detail the hardware faults. The software faults are known about because they had a software contractor who turned out to be useless and they had to bin them at the last minute. Software issues are par for the course with new cars, I don't think a finished version of Windows has ever been released.

By comparison in Evo Issue 163 page 153, the newly acquired 458 has undergone 2 fuel sender faults, the first unit having been replaced and is currently also sufferring from a sticking exhaust valve and a misfire and the seat bolster is already torn. The side mirror glass also cracked from vibrations. Then you have the disco inferno variants. The 458 having been out several years, so I don't see it as a problem that an innovative new car is having some teething issues when longer-running competitors are still outstanding fixes. I'm sure the problems won't persist for as long as Porsche's RMS issue. Damn that must have been going for over a decade now.
Perhaps his hardware faults are the same as the other guy's. The cause for the stop in production is hardware-related (faulty brake hose connectors).
Question is, of those ~3000 458s on the road, how many have as many faults? From the posts of those McLaren owners, it seems there are more problems affecting more of the percentage of cars on the road. I think 458s on the ground and running is not yet quite two years, but having cars burn after so many decades of experience is also inexcusable.
Porsche's RMS problem doesn't put the car into limp home mode, nor does it keep an owner from opening his car door. Neither Porsche nor Ferrari made the bold claims to quality that McLaren did. If McLaren had simply shut up and not mentioned that, that would be something else. When the claim is made, and execution is left wanting, then it's perfectly reasonable to criticize the execution against said claims.
 
Perhaps his hardware faults are the same as the other guy's. The cause for the stop in production is hardware-related (faulty brake hose connectors).
Question is, of those ~3000 458s on the road, how many have as many faults? From the posts of those McLaren owners, it seems there are more problems affecting more of the percentage of cars on the road. I think 458s on the ground and running is not yet quite two years, but having cars burn after so many decades of experience is also inexcusable.
Porsche's RMS problem doesn't put the car into limp home mode, nor does it keep an owner from opening his car door. Neither Porsche nor Ferrari made the bold claims to quality that McLaren did. If McLaren had simply shut up and not mentioned that, that would be something else. When the claim is made, and execution is left wanting, then it's perfectly reasonable to criticize the execution against said claims.
I don't honestly know. A lot of the 3000 458s on the road have faced flame expiration and many others have died due to natural causes. Simon George's 458 seems to be a particularly cretinous little creature and you'd think they'd have given him a good example with him being a journalist. I personally pay very little attention to internet-based reliability concerns. I give internet-based reliability topics about the same regard as tin-foil-helmet essays. It seems that no new volume production car ever gets launched these days without the same order of posts.

As regards the Porsche RMS issue, what you say isn't necessarily true. It depends how long you leave it and how large the leak gets (they also had PDK software isssues when it was introduced). I speak for most drivers when I say that it's generally a bad thing when oil leaves the car outside of routine changes, simply because you have to replace it if nothing else. It's also unacceptable when visting friends and relatives to effectively have your car urinating in their yard. One would expect better decorum even from something with 4 legs and the fact that the issue has persisted since sometime last century is a little ridiculous for a manufacturer with Porsche's reputation. Whatever McLaren's current issues I'm sure that they won't still be here in 2025 as the 911 RMS issue undoubtedly will.

Guibo said:
like this was part of their COTY comparo, so the timing suggests this is the MP4-12C with the updates previously mentioned
The black car is the same one 5th gear tested, so it's still to be updated. The Sport Auto car has the updates I believe.

Looks like the online poll put the MP4-12C on top according to the Auto Express article. I guess that's the problem with judgement, it varies from one person to the next.
 
I don't honestly know. A lot of the 3000 458s on the road have faced flame expiration and many others have died due to natural causes. Simon George's 458 seems to be a particularly cretinous little creature and you'd think they'd have given him a good example with him being a journalist. I personally pay very little attention to internet-based reliability concerns. I give internet-based reliability topics about the same regard as tin-foil-helmet essays. It seems that no new volume production car ever gets launched these days without the same order of posts.

As regards the Porsche RMS issue, what you say isn't necessarily true. It depends how long you leave it and how large the leak gets (they also had PDK software isssues when it was introduced). I speak for most drivers when I say that it's generally a bad thing when oil leaves the car outside of routine changes, simply because you have to replace it if nothing else. It's also unacceptable when visting friends and relatives to effectively have your car urinating in their yard. One would expect better decorum even from something with 4 legs and the fact that the issue has persisted since sometime last century is a little ridiculous for a manufacturer with Porsche's reputation. Whatever McLaren's current issues I'm sure that they won't still be here in 2025 as the 911 RMS issue undoubtedly will.

Looks like the online poll put the MP4-12C on top according to the Auto Express article. I guess that's the problem with judgement, it varies from one person to the next.
A lot of 458's have burned? Possibly. How many do you mean by "a lot"?
As for Simon George's car, he's only personally had the problem of running out of fuel due to a faulty sender. That's one fault. Not the 11 or whatever counted by that one McLaren owner. Secondly, his car is used as part of an exotic car driving company. Thus the 7,300 miles in only 6 months. We don't know if the front-end rattling he's talking about now is a result of a customer going off, as in a previous entry about his Murcielago. This is very different from McLaren owners who are just taking delivery now and finding so many faults with relatively low miles compared to Simon George's 458.

The RMS leaks tend to be gradual and get worse over time. They do not render the car inoperable as a stuck door solenoid would. I think you keep overlooking the picture here. This is not simply about all new cars having problems. All new cars don't make the same bold claims. If Ron Dennis makes a claim about his car, are we not allowed to make a statement on the nature of that claim's delivery?
"Sometime last century." Nice hyperbole. That was only 11 years ago.

AutoExpress is based in the UK and I'll bet has a primarily UK viewership. What does that online poll have to do with anything other than showing that mag readers love stats and just might vote for the home team product. Try the test again in Italy and see the result.
 
A lot of 458's have burned? Possibly. How many do you mean by "a lot"?
As for Simon George's car, he's only personally had the problem of running out of fuel due to a faulty sender. That's one fault. Not the 11 or whatever counted by that one McLaren owner. Secondly, his car is used as part of an exotic car driving company. Thus the 7,300 miles in only 6 months. We don't know if the front-end rattling he's talking about now is a result of a customer going off, as in a previous entry about his Murcielago. This is very different from McLaren owners who are just taking delivery now and finding so many faults with relatively low miles compared to Simon George's 458.

The RMS leaks tend to be gradual and get worse over time. They do not render the car inoperable as a stuck door solenoid would. I think you keep overlooking the picture here. This is not simply about all new cars having problems. All new cars don't make the same bold claims. If Ron Dennis makes a claim about his car, are we not allowed to make a statement on the nature of that claim's delivery?
"Sometime last century." Nice hyperbole. That was only 11 years ago.

AutoExpress is based in the UK and I'll bet has a primarily UK viewership. What does that online poll have to do with anything other than showing that mag readers love stats and just might vote for the home team product. Try the test again in Italy and see the result.
Yeah, no. read Issue 163 of Evo. The fuel sender has failed again. The exhaust valve is stuck and the car is misfiring and the seat bolster has torn. I counts 5 faults in about 1 month on a car that's been out several years.

If you don't replace the oil that leaks from the RMS then the car will become inoperable.

All new cars don't make the same bold claims? Errr... yeah they do. What about the 220mph LFA that was going to cost $200k? What the hell happened to that eh? The 'un-paralleled Porsche quality' yet just about every car suffers a leaking RMS at some point. Ferrari? Their reliability can't even be taken seriously and that statement doesn't just apply to the 458, it's an historical fact.

When another car at the same price point beats every single MP4-12C time then you can say that they haven't set new benchmarks. At present no car in that price range is quicker to 150mph. Overall it's lap times are also faster than those of the competition. Ride quality - unparalleled in this category. Ergonomics - unparalleled. Fuel economy - unparalleled. Emissions - unparalled. It's quite a big deal to tick all those boxes.
 
Yeah, no. read Issue 163 of Evo. The fuel sender has failed again. The exhaust valve is stuck and the car is misfiring and the seat bolster has torn. I counts 5 faults in about 1 month on a car that's been out several years.

If you don't replace the oil that leaks from the RMS then the car will become inoperable.

All new cars don't make the same bold claims? Errr... yeah they do. What about the 220mph LFA that was going to cost $200k? What the hell happened to that eh? The 'un-paralleled Porsche quality' yet just about every car suffers a leaking RMS at some point. Ferrari? Their reliability can't even be taken seriously and that statement doesn't just apply to the 458, it's an historical fact.

When another car at the same price point beats every single MP4-12C time then you can say that they haven't set new benchmarks. At present no car in that price range is quicker to 150mph. Overall it's lap times are also faster than those of the competition. Ride quality - unparalleled in this category. Ergonomics - unparalleled. Fuel economy - unparalleled. Emissions - unparalled. It's quite a big deal to tick all those boxes.
Several years, more like a couple of years.

Incorrect. RMS doesn't render the car inoperable. Like any other slow, gradual leak, you add oil. When the time comes, you take the car to the dealer where they replace the entire engine. Where did Porsche claim to beat other cars in every measure, including quality?

Where did Lexus ever themselves claim the LFA would do 220 mph and cost only $200k?

Its lap times are not faster than the 458 on the days that mattered: same-day, same-conditions, same drivers. It's not unparalleled under braking or wet lap times. And so far, there appears to be a lot more quality issues and customers tired of delays and backing out of orders than I've seen for other cars.
 

Thread statistics

Created
Guibo,
Last reply from
Soup,
Replies
32
Views
3,952

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top