Vs The eternal battle...

Vehicle comparisons, matchups, debates, performance battles, and head-to-head discussions.

Deutsch

Tire Trailblazer
Messages
6,501
BMW and Mercedes-Benz are at war again, and the stakes could not be higher. This is not simply a matter of 7 Series versus S-Class or SLK against Z4. This is a struggle for the future direction of the automobile.
Inside Line asked senior figures from Mercedes and BMW to outline their companies' visions of the future, and while they agree on some issues, there are also some startling and fundamental differences of opinion.

Munich is represented by Professor Raymond Freymann. As the managing director of BMW's Research and Technology division, he is responsible for "translating crazy ideas into reality." His department contains about 200 scientists working to define the BMW of 2030 and beyond.

In the Mercedes corner is Hans Multhaupt. As the program manager for Mercedes' large cars, including the S-Class, SLR McLaren and Maybach, Multhaupt will engineer the luxury cars of tomorrow.

Societal Changes — an Evolving Demographic
The demographic of Western society will change significantly in the next 30 years, and this has an important bearing on both companies' future directions. "We can say for certain who has not been born," says Freymann. "The 'silver generation' is becoming increasingly important. By 2030, over a third of the world's population will be over 60. Single households are also on the increase, and women are now driving larger cars, particularly in the U.S."

But we won't be witnessing the development of the BMW 70 Series or the Mercedes-Benz Silver-Class. "The silver people are the proudest on earth," continues Freymann. "A car built for old people would not be saleable, but you must also ensure that there's no reason for them to reject the car."

The Importance of Brand
The importance of "brand" has grown dramatically in Europe in the past 30 years, and it's also becoming more important in the U.S. In the future, established marques such as BMW and Mercedes will seek to reaffirm their brand values for the sake of an edge over new competition from emerging markets, especially China.

"People will not buy products from companies they don't know and don't like," says BMW's Freymann. "Car manufacturers from countries like China will grow from the bottom up. They may become a threat to a company like Ford, but not to us. We are not just selling a car, we are selling an image."

Both Freymann and Multhaupt are keen to define their core values. "The driver must always be in the loop, that's central to the BMW ethos," says Freymann. "People buy an M5 because it's fun to drive and those impulses won't change. Our cars must also be safe, stylish and reliable."

Safety and reliability are also central to Mercedes' core values, but Multhaupt places a greater emphasis on comfort. While Freymann cannot countenance the thought of a driverless BMW, Multhaupt is happy to consider the concept of a Mercedes that, in certain circumstances, drives itself. But he reckons that the technology is unlikely to be in place for at least 30 years.

This subtle difference of emphasis has a major bearing on the two companies' approaches.

The "Engines" of Tomorrow
Although both believe that hydrogen is the fuel of the future, the two companies differ dramatically in their application of the fuel. BMW is convinced that the future lies with internal combustion engines powered by liquid hydrogen. Freymann claims to have built a one-cylinder supercharged direct-injection hydrogen engine that's already 125-percent more efficient than a normally aspirated gasoline equivalent.

Such an engine is a long way off, but in a couple of years, BMW will launch a bi-fuel version of the 7 Series, capable of running on hydrogen or gasoline. To service such a car, hydrogen filling stations have opened in several European cities, and California's Governor Schwarzenegger has committed to building a "hydrogen highway" in California. According to BMW's vision, we could be about to enter the age of the guilt-free V8.

Mercedes' Multhaupt thinks that such a vision is "stupid." According to the engineer, the widespread use of hydrogen internal combustion will "never, ever happen" because an internal combustion engine will always be too inefficient. "By 2030, we will have fuel-cell vehicles powered by electric motors," says Multhaupt. "The principle problems are solved, now it is only a question of cost and we are making breakthroughs all the time." The development guru believes that an onboard transformer will be used to generate the necessary hydrogen.

Freymann does accept that, "a small, 5kW fuel-cell unit could be used to power the auxiliary systems, such as the air conditioning, when the car is stationary." But he reckons that "fuel cells have a long way to go before they can become a viable, affordable means of driving the car."

Safety
Both men agree that further major breakthroughs in passive safety — the ability to further lessen the degree of injury in an accident — are now unlikely. More emphasis in the future will be placed on avoiding accidents (active safety). "A bird doesn't have armor. We need to develop the intelligence of a bird to avoid an accident," says Multhaupt.

The key to this technology will be to develop a means by which cars communicate with each other. Several manufacturers have already signed an agreement to this end, and BMW is testing methods of intervehicle communication using wireless LAN networks. This technology would not only be used to help cars detect and respond to threatening situations, it could also be used to improve traffic management by automatically directing a car around a jam. "This is the big vision of the future," says Multhaupt.

Steady as She Goes
Science fiction books of the 1960s were full of flying cars and flying saucers, but even with the arrival of a hydrogen fuel source, both men have a conservative vision of the next 20 years. "We are talking about a flying car, but we are not working on one," says Freymann.

"The car of 2030 will be better connected to the outside world — we've moved from a non-knowledge to a knowledge-based society, centered on the Web. But it will still be instantly recognizable to us," Freymann asserts. "Cars won't be flying on air cushions — they won't have six tires. The driving experience won't change dramatically."

In this, Multhaupt agrees, noting that his company works in a notoriously conservative sector of the market.

Hollywood visions of the future will therefore have to wait, but the times they are a-changing. The automobile will continue to evolve, most particularly under the hood. And in that fundamental area of fuels and engine technology, BMW and Mercedes-Benz are veering off in different directions. They will not both be correct in their assessment of the future.

source: Edumnds
 
wow, what a great write up. Pretty strong opinions there, and as far as Hydrogen goes, its wild how they can both go in such different directions.

:usa7uh: Nice find Stuttgarter.
 
I personally believe that MB is thinking in the more pratical sense w/ fuel cells. There are too many issues w/ hydrogen in making it a widely available fuel source, and not to mention safety. For now hybrids will be the next big thing until will run completely dry of petrol, great in term solution.

I'm surpised how little they touched on such things as design, but I guess w/ both companies being leaders in both and making such loud statments w/ the design of their products, that there really was no need to say anything? I think w/ both companies though, and this was not mentioned, we'll see more individualized products making their way out, starting w/ the new generation of cars at hand.
 
Just a few other passing thoughts.. I wonder how the performance brands will respond to alternative fuel sources in making engines that have both capability to be fuel efficent and offer high levels of performance at the same time. Also, I love the "silver" motif that MB has used throughout the years, silver seems to represent grace, passion, and advance in the mind of those behind the magic at Mercedes Benz.
 
That article as just ok imo. It really didn't get into other things that these two disagree on. I really wanted to read more about that. Mercedes and BMW are the leaders in the luxury car world that is unarguable. BMW has come out of Mercedes' shadow in recent years, but Mercedes' turn around is underway.

M
 
Interesting read. I wish it covered the divergent paths and strategies of the two companies in greater depth. Reference to what other key competitors are doing i.e Toyota/Lexus, Audi etc., to put the actions of Mercedes and BMW into perspective, would have also been good. For example, BMW thinks that a hydrogen internal combustion engine is the way to go, whereas Mercedes views this as completely inefficient. What is the take on this by other Key industry players?

Thanks for the article Stuttgarter. In reference to this Silver motif, in this article it appears to be BMW making reference to it, not Mercedes. :t-hands:
 
I found it interesting that neither brand is working on flying vehicles because it will be the affluent market that will be the first to buy flying vehicles - BMW and Mercedes might not be the most prestigious way to travel in the future. When personal flying vehicles are available to wealthy people, the S class and 7er will be about as relevant as a luxury horse-cart is today.
 
Flying vehicles are waaaaaay into the future. I'm sure the Germans will be amongst the first to pioneer this direction when it becomes feasible.
 
I don't think they are so distant as suggested - they will not be available to everybody of course but I'm sure we will have personal flying vehicles within 20 years - Mercedes and BMW simply can not compete in that market because it is not their expertise - to suggest that they will be the first to offer them is utterly unrealistic - it will be companies like Bombardier and Gulfstream that will be producing the most prestigeous vehicles for the wealthy - Mercedes and BMW will become a decidely middle-class way to travel.
 
Cool article.. i belive very much in MB´s theory.. just check out the F600.. the fuelcell is outstanding in that car.. but time will tell what works best.. and with such diffrent direction on if bound to fail..
 
Hmmm, interesring article, altough the lack of mention of the Porsche-VW AG with Audi alliance/whatever it is, makes it less worthy.
Cool picture by the way. :cool:
Altough the bimmer bot would look better as a black M5 transformer and MB as a CLS.
 
The F500 and F600 thread has lots of info on this.... i agree as for Hyd, being the right direction...
 

Trending content


Back
Top