Comparison tests Data comparison Mercedes EQC, Jaguar I-Pace, Tesla X 75D

[bialkov]

You still have to wait until the spring of 2019 to get the order, but the data can already be compared today.
It can be seen from the long wheelbases of the Jaguar I-Pace and Tesla X that they were designed uncompromisingly on e-car. So you get more battery capacity between the axles in the subfloor. Due to the extremely expensive price of the Tesla X, the variant 75D was used here.
In terms of weight, you may also recognize that the EQC was derived from the GLC and therefore had to make some compromises that raised the weight. The EQC and GLC F-Cell share the EVA I platform. The EVA 2 platform is then designed only for e-cars and was not derived from a combustion platform. Overall, it can be said that every e-motor with periperia weighs around 100 kg. The battery further 650 kg. That the drivetrain in the EQC alone weighs 850 kg.

When accelerating, they are all the same speed. The top speed is limited at all. Limited more at Mercedes. However, due to the battery sizes, you can not drive fast for a long time anyway. If you go on long trips, you should not drive faster than 120 km / h.
The I-Pace has for Germany the not well usable single-phase on-board loader, which does not manage to load the I-Pace overnight. A new version of the on-board loader for Germany is supposedly already in the planning.

Electric now has a Mercedes, according to the Daimler slogan. You can see that when looking at MBUX, feel, build quality or the Multibeam LED light. The assistance system from Tesla is a bit further than that of Mercedes (because Tesla does not adhere to all Level 2 standards, for example, maximum steering forces for tighter turns). The system is much more expensive.

The width of Jaguar and Tesla are extremely ugly for cities and parking garages and go in the wrong direction.

The trunk of the Tesla offers much more due to the length of the vehicle. He also has a frunk (front trunk) in the amount of 150 liters. The Jaguar has here a storage compartment for the charging cable of 27 liters. The Mercedes is the smallest with the 500 liters. However, this is the VDA measurement method. Jaguar could specify the volume according to SAE. This is higher in experience.
Mercedes EQC

Jaguar I-Pace

Tesla X 75D

JESMB (News)

 

[sucu123]

When I first saw the technical information of the EQC, I actually thought that they were pretty bad. This comparison shows that the EQC is quite competitive.

 

[Centurion]

When I first saw the technical information of the EQC, I actually thought that they were pretty bad. This comparison shows that the EQC is quite competitive.

It is and I like that it's cheaper than the iPace.

 

[TheNewBATMAN]

The EQC is nothing as innovative as the iPace. Or Model X. Or future iNext.

No front trunk, a lump of transmission tunnel, proportion that is not different than an ICE engined SUV? It's just an electrified GLC.

Electric cars should bring a totally new era of proportions, packaging and interior space utility belt. Which is clearly showcased on the iPace.

For Mercedes' true innovative EV, I think we must wait for the EQS. Of which proportion seems radical.

 

[EnI]

So, it seems Tesla Model X is in just another price segment than MB EQC or even Jaguar i-Pace.

The upcoming Audi e-tron quattro SAV and AUDI e-tron quattro coupe SAC will be positioned approx. in line with EQC (the SAV model) and i-Pace (the SAC model) price wise. And will also feature similar battery capacity & offer similar AWD performance.

And then we come to BMW iX3 - which it seems to at least initially come with less power (270hp), no AWD (sDrive) yet with ~75kWh battery - meaning the range will be better (due to less powerful engine and lesser performance ability of the vehicle). Which indicates lower, more affordable price - for the entry model. More potent AWD (S?) version is to come later and be more in line with EQC, i-Pace and Audi e-tron quattro price & performance wise.

While BMW iNEXT (i6?) will (in the entry version) be somewhere closer to Model X 75D, and the (P)90D, (P)100D versions in the more potent variants - with stronger motors & batteries.

Any sign of Lexus BEV SUV? Or Volvo and Land Rover / Range Rover BEV SUVs?

 

[Mars1965]

When I first saw the technical information of the EQC, I actually thought that they were pretty bad. This comparison shows that the EQC is quite competitive.

The I-Pace does a claimed 298 WLTP miles, which is 336 NEDC miles. The Model X 75D does a claimed 259 NEDC miles, so the Jag wins somewhat comfortably.

Source: Jaguar I-Pace vs Tesla Model X 75D: How do they compare? | DriveTribe

Edit: 1 mi = 1,6093 km

 

[Centurion]

Any sign of Lexus BEV SUV? Or Volvo and Land Rover / Range Rover BEV SUVs?

Volvo's first BEV will be unveiled next year.

 

[CrunchSlaughtered]

And then we come to BMW iX3 - which it seems to at least initially come with less power (270hp), no AWD (sDrive) yet with ~75kWh battery - meaning the range will be better (due to less powerful engine and lesser performance ability of the vehicle).

The maximum power of the electrical motor does not influence the range when it is measured according to the standard cycles. Very offen the more powerful elmotor has the better efficiency.

 

[Centurion]

The maximum power of the electrical motor does not influence the range when it is measured according to the standard cycles. Very offen the more powerful elmotor has the better efficiency.

Makes. The same is largely true for ICEs. Fuel consumption and range are the result of how heavy your foot is and whether you coast when possible.