Bono wants cars to bring sexy back


Bartek S.

Aerodynamic Ace
5c0a9ffeeaf88cef977888e873642b4b.webp
Return of the Automobile as a Sexual Object

11e61f7354b3d855edcb9effc1c20ceb.webp


How is it that the country that made us all fall in love with the automobile has failed, with only a few exceptions, to produce a single family sedan with the style and humor and grace of the cars produced in the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s? Put aside the question of whether those models were male (as in longer, lower and wider, Dr. Freud) or female (as in fender skirts, curvy belt lines and, of course, headlights). Either way, they all had sex appeal. (In Ireland in the ’70s, it was the E-Type Jag that made sense of puberty.) Today, however, we have the mundanity of our marriage to the minivan and the S.U.V. and long-term relationships with midsize cars that are, forgive me, a little heavy in the rear cargo hold.
Are aerodynamics to blame? Economics? Or that most American of inventions, design by committee? It hurts me to say this about democracy (and I know because my band is one), but rarely does majority rule produce something of beauty.
That’s why the Obama administration — while it still holds the keys to the big automakers — ought to put some style fascists into the mix: the genius of Marc Newson ... Steve Jobs and Jonny Ive from Apple ... Frank Gehry, the architect, and Jeff Koons, the artist. Put the great industrial designers in the front seat, right along with sound financial stewardship ... the greener, the cleaner, the meaner on fossil fuels, the sexier for me. Check out the Tesla or the Fisker Karma car, designed by the same team that gave the world the Aston Martin.
More: nytimes
 
Yes that is what we need an Ipod car:pukeface:

How to make cars sexy agian... simple get rid of most of the government rules. All the crap they force on the automakers is what has messed them up: cars must be as soft as a pillow when they hit a person, headlights must be here and like this, tail lights must be like this, seats must support a 750 pound person...

Let the companies have more leeway on design, as long as they follow a few simple broad rules.
 
Yes that is what we need an Ipod car:pukeface:

How to make cars sexy agian... simple get rid of most of the government rules. All the crap they force on the automakers is what has messed them up: cars must be as soft as a pillow when they hit a person, headlights must be here and like this, tail lights must be like this, seats must support a 750 pound person...

Let the companies have more leeway on design, as long as they follow a few simple broad rules.

When your wife or child gets hit by a car and turns out okay thanks to all those regulations you're demising here, you'll start to understand why they are in place.

I prefer a slightly ungainly, but life-saving car to a deadly beauty.
 
^Really? Because I'm thinking a heavier car would do much better then a lighter car when it comes to an accident.
 
^Really? Because I'm thinking a heavier car would do much better then a lighter car when it comes to an accident.
It will if your heavy car smashed against a tiny light car, but in general, if you are in a heavier car and smashed against a stationary object, eg a tree, the forces of the impact will be higher because of a higher mass.
 
It will if your heavy car smashed against a tiny light car, but in general, if you are in a heavier car and smashed against a stationary object, eg a tree, the forces of the impact will be higher because of a higher mass.

Exactly.

People in 2,000 kgs cars are safe at the cost of people in 1,500 kgs cars. One solution is to limit the number of heavy cars on the roads.
 
^Really? Because I'm thinking a heavier car would do much better then a lighter car when it comes to an accident.
Basic rule of thumb is, heavier car wins. If we put aside struction, the heavier car just has greater mass potential. But I guess that's not of question.

The heavier the objects are, the greater forces are at play.
If all cars were of equal mass and say two 2000kg cars were to crash, would you expect more mayhem if the cars were 1000kg?
 
When your wife or child gets hit by a car and turns out okay thanks to all those regulations you're demising here, you'll start to understand why they are in place.

I prefer a slightly ungainly, but life-saving car to a deadly beauty.

I would prefer a sexy car with a driver who pays attention to the road.


My question is "Who gives a flying **** what Bono thinks about cars?"...

I don't. He thinks green cars are sexy. That is like saying I think my 4 foot 8, 450 pound, acne covered wife is sexy because she eats tofu. :pukeface:
 

Thread statistics

Created
Bartek S.,
Last reply from
Gullwing,
Replies
12
Views
1,521

Trending content


Back
Top