F1 Autosport Overtakings 1983 To 2007


Imhotep Evil

Torque Titan
autosport.com
and is titled "Passing Thoughts: F1 Overtaking Analysis". Written by
Michele Merlino - subscr.


The data goes back to 1983.


excludes:
a] any place changes made during pit stops
b] all lapping or unlapping manoeuvres
c] any place changes made during the first lap
d] some passes where lap time analysis 'proves' that a driver had a problem which caused him to lose places


 
True, but this chart excludes retirement gains.


several reasons:

- more cars (30+ vs. 22 today),
- less chicanes
- more mechanical grip
- turbo boost push-to-pass buttons
- longer breaking distances
- no refueling
- cleaner/proper aerodynamics (this does not mean less downforce as some had more than today; but less turbulence, less sensitivity and less drag vs. engine power)
- (much) wider technological/performance gap thru the field in terms of tires (till 84), brakes, engines/engine-electronics (kind of like the multi class format of ALMS/LMS )


Some of those 80s numbers will not return simply because of there are less cars closer togheter.
 
In the past the cars were as unreliable as a 1950s Russian space rocket, many drivers didn't even know if the car would last the entire race.


True, here's an intro and a race.

[GV]8442471591391179523[/GV]
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And a true good ol' fashion overtaking + close finish race:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Clean aero cars with slicks:


Ground effects 1.0
(venturi undertrays + sliding skirts + almost no ground clearance)
with lovely slicks 21 inch rear :icondrool

1de3185f57eff8d0a8f6962d86880f57._.webp



2.278 Kgs downforce @ 150mph/240 kmh with 285 Kgs of drag :t-hair::t-hair::t-hair: :bowdown::bowdown::bowdown:
Lift-to-drag ratio: 8:1
[ The Gods of downforce and aero-efficiency were the wing-skirt cars and they'll never - ever be equalled. ]



Ground effects 2.0
(true flat bottom/no plank + potent diffuser + ground effect front wing + active suspensions + 6 cm ground clearance suposebly) with nice slicks 18 inch rear

a455dbe61f142c69609d7a0cea118b69.webp
 
Having thought about it I'm glad that launch and traction controls are forbidden this year. I think it will result in increased overtakings because it will push the drivers capabilities and balls to the limit. Minor mistakes will no longer be corrected and the drivers will pay for them.
 
>
^ Personally I think F1 should have banned the drivers and let some unlimited/unrestricted cars drive themselves.
600 km/h on the Monza straight, 12Gs in the bends, Formula unlimited. :D
 
Bans and restrictions (1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 2000 to 2005).
The front wing generated/was in ground effect. If the front started to understeer the active suspensions would dive the nose thus the front wing would generated more ground effect downforce and stabilise the car. By 97 teams were using flexi wings to stabilise to front but they were banned in 1998.


Here's a 1990 Ferrari



now take a look at the F2000 front wing



Now compare to the F2005

005e591a77a4970a86319522b0ce5d0b.webp


See how much higher and curvy-er the front wing is. Because it is so high the car behind can lose up to 80 to 90% of the front downforce effectively being forced to back off or crash the car.
 
>
^ Personally I think F1 should have banned the drivers and let some unlimited/unrestricted cars drive themselves.
600 km/h on the Monza straight, 12Gs in the bends, Formula unlimited. :D

There would be some great crashes, today on the Monza straight the Ferrari lost control at 580km/h, spun out and flipped end over end for 3.4 km before landing in someones house.
Though the cars would probably brake after four laps.
Would be cool though.
 

Thread statistics

Created
Imhotep Evil,
Last reply from
PanterroR,
Replies
14
Views
2,115

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top