2008 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study


siko

Tire Trailblazer
Messages
6,459
a6ff2960aa2ec11904551c53a67bd6ed.webp


PRESS RELEASE

J.D. Power and Associates Reports:
  • Overall Initial Quality Improves Considerably, with Gains Shared Across Most Manufacturers
  • American Honda, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales
    • Each Capture Three Initial Quality Model Awards
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif.: 4 June 2008 - Initial quality in the automotive industry has improved significantly in 2008, with substantial gains demonstrated by nearly three-fourths of the 36 ranked nameplates, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2008 Initial Quality StudySM (IQS) released today. Overall quality improves to 118 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) in 2008, down from 125 PP100 in 2007.

"Due to some strong new-vehicle launches, in addition to a continued reduction in the level of defects and malfunctions, overall quality improves by 6 percent in 2008, compared with 2007," said David Sargent, vice president of automotive research at J.D. Power and Associates. "This gain is driven not only by strong advances from many of the high-volume brands such as Chevrolet, Ford and Toyota, but also by very significant improvements by many other automakers. This industry-wide improvement is a testament to the effort that automakers are putting into listening to the voice of the customer, and the hard work they have undertaken to integrate that feedback to design, engineer and manufacture better-quality vehicles. From working closely with the industry, we see the importance that is placed on initial quality. Vehicle manufacturers and consumers alike are reaping the rewards of this effort."

The Initial Quality Study serves as the industry benchmark for new-vehicle quality measured at 90 days of ownership. The study is used extensively by vehicle manufacturers worldwide to help them design and build better vehicles and by consumers to help them in their vehicle purchase decisions. Initial quality has been shown over the years to be an excellent predictor of long-term durability, which can significantly impact consumer purchase decisions. The study captures problems experienced by owners in two distinct categories-quality of design and defects and malfunctions.

The study finds that 86 percent of the overall improvement is due to advances in eliminating defects and malfunctions. Minimizing design problems remains a major challenge for the industry, particularly since new technology, such as navigation and entertainment devices, is becoming increasingly common in today's new vehicles.

"As consumer demand for new and more advanced wireless communication, navigation and audio technology continues to grow, manufacturers face challenges related to how well these systems are integrated into their vehicles," said Sargent. "In particular, issues with difficult-to-use audio and entertainment controls and voice command recognition failure are among the top ten problems most frequently reported by customers. Since hands-free communication for drivers will become a mandate in more and more areas throughout the U.S., this will need to be an area of continued focus for automakers."

The study also finds that new-vehicle sales patterns in 2008 have shifted away from the largest models and toward smaller models.

"This shift in sales preferences among new-vehicle buyers is in part a response to rapidly increasing fuel prices," said Sargent. "The good news for consumers in this difficult environment is that they can downsize with confidence, as there are many models with high initial quality in the smaller-vehicle segments. J.D. Power and Associates forecasts that 28 new compact-vehicle models will launch by 2010, and it will be particularly important for manufacturers to ensure high initial quality in these launches."

2008 IQS Ranking Highlights
Honda models capture three segment awards-more than any other nameplate in the 2008 study-for the Civic, CR-V and Fit. Garnering two segment awards each are: Chevrolet (Malibu and Silverado LD); Dodge (Dakota and Durango); Infiniti (EX-Series and M-Series); Lexus (LS and RX); and Mercedes-Benz (CLK-Class and E-Class). The Porsche 911 has the fewest quality problems in the industry, with just 67 problems per 100 vehicles. Also receiving segment awards are the Ford E-Series, Lincoln Navigator, Mazda MX-5 Miata, Pontiac Grand Prix Sedan and Toyota Sequoia.

"In past years, automakers have frequently struggled to achieve very high initial quality with new models," said Sargent. "With product launches and redesigns often being problematic for manufacturers from a quality standpoint, it is particularly impressive that the Chevrolet Malibu and Infiniti EX-Series achieve such high levels of quality that they receive awards in their launch year."

For a third consecutive year, Porsche tops the overall nameplate rankings, averaging 87 PP100. Following in the rankings are Infiniti (which improves from 9th rank position in 2007), Lexus, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota, respectively. Audi posts the largest improvement in ranking, moving from 26th place in 2007 to 10th in 2008.

"Porsche continues its steady improvement and has succeeded in distancing itself from the second-ranked nameplate to a greater degree in 2008-by a gap of 11 PP100-compared with 3 PP100 in 2007," said Sargent.

Assembly Plant Awards
The Mercedes-Benz assembly plant in Sindelfingen, Germany, receives the Platinum Plant Quality Award for producing vehicles yielding the fewest defects and malfunctions. Averaging just 33 PP100, the plant produces the Mercedes-Benz CL-Class, CLS-Class, E-Class Sedan, E-Class Wagon and S-Class. Plant awards are based solely on defect and malfunction counts.

Among North and South American plants, the Toyota plant in Baja California, Mexico, which produces the Toyota Tacoma, achieves the Gold Plant Quality Award.

In the Asia Pacific region, Toyota's Fujimatsu, Japan, plant, which produces the Toyota Prius, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award.

The 2008 Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 81,500 purchasers and lessees of new 2008 model-year cars and trucks surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 228-question battery designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate problem determination and drive product improvement. The study was fielded between February and April 2008.

Find more detailed findings on new-vehicle quality performance as well as model photos and specs by watching a video, reading an article and reviewing quality ratings at JDPower.com.

[Source: J.D. Powers via Autoblog.com]

4aed67a7fba98001c5f0597fb3e8604f.webp

ff5399b94f0ed15823149ceeaa766eae.webp
 
If my memory is good... Audi went up :usa7uh:, MB went way way up :usa7uh::usa7uh:... and BMW sank like a rock in water :eusa_doh:!
 
Lol J.D change a lot. sometimes BMW is in top sometimes its another german brand in the bottom. My car is doing fine so I'm not worried by this JD power survey.

PS in Sweden there was recently a car survey. BMw finished number 1 and Toyota got beaten by BMW.
 
While this is nice, it is the 3-year dependability study that Mercedes must make a good showing in. That said, this is a great news for Mercedes-Benz. Better quality than either BMW or Audi is what Mercedes (was) should be known for not out-cornering them on a track. The E and S placed high, that is a huge turn around from just a few years ago.


M
 
Good news for MB, they appear to have solve their quality issues for now, as Merc1 has said, the real test is the 3-year dependability study. Our E-class is a little over 3 years old now and it has been mechanically very reliable, there are a few minor electronic issues which went away by themselves, but so far it is fine.

I am surprised by the poor performance of the Mini, it is placed below Land Rover, and what is going on with Acura, it is 12 places behind Honda in the rankings, something isn't right.
 
MB will most certainly be at the number one spot within the coming years if they have already made a turnaround like this. :eusa_danc
 
Lol J.D change a lot. sometimes BMW is in top sometimes its another german brand in the bottom. My car is doing fine so I'm not worried by this JD power survey.

PS in Sweden there was recently a car survey. BMw finished number 1 and Toyota got beaten by BMW.

The massive variations in rankings is because they have so many different lists measuring many different aspects. People tend to overlook that.

Great effort on Mb's part thats for sure. A promising turn around.
 
Holy smokes, what happened to Bmw :t-hands:...?

Nice job from Audi & Merc though :eusa_clap ...!
 
MB will most certainly be at the number one spot within the coming years if they have already made a turnaround like this. :eusa_danc
hmm ...that sounds dangerously like an out-of-control fanboy statement bum-man :D

Actually, I think Porsche will retain the crown based purely on its relatively low production numbers.
 
A lot of research of current and future company practices went into that statement. :D


Edit: All joking aside, with Porsche now tied in with VAG will it's resources become spread too thin thoughout the empire? And exactly how reliable will it's new sedan be, the Cayenne wasn't exactly a paradigm of reliability when it was introduced. With all the doom and gloom coming from me about Porsche aside, Mercedes still have a statement to uphold. I don't find it totally ridiculous for them if they came all the way from the pooper to within striking distance of Lexus in the matter of a couple years.
 
great news for mb and even audi

i no mb had bad years off reliabilty and i suffered it first hand with the w203 c class we have and a current e270cdi 2002 model i have

it is obvious the change in those two cars and my crrent w204 c class the current s and even the gl which is made in us

well the w203 interiro quality is very poor and i ahve the pre facelift


the w204 is built hard strong and like a tank i even find it much better built and a better interior then the e class


i have three cars built from merc since2006
the s350 2006,,,c220cdi 2007 anfd the gl2008

and touch wood so far those three are having no problem at all


i must say i can see the improvement in mb quality and build

keep it up mb and get no 1 soon hope so ....


also i agree the bmw has done quite bad from my experiece the 3er interiro quality is poor my cousin owned one and the paint from door handles turned from grey to black in less then a year also he had problems with his steering he ultimataly sold it bought a w204 c class thanks to me ....
 
also i agree the bmw has done quite bad from my experiece the 3er interiro quality is poor my cousin owned one and the paint from door handles turned from grey to black in less then a year also he had problems with his steering he ultimataly sold it bought a w204 c class thanks to me ....

My family been driving BMW for 15 years, never had a single interior problem at all. But I know og people having problem with Audi interiors like noise and squeaking.
Me and my family will not agree with this J.D Power survey, reliability is one of the reasons why we keep buying BMW's.
 
I'm glad the E-Class placed so high. That car was probably the model with the most consumer complaints and electronic niggles in the MB lineup and it made a stunning recovery.

Our 2002 E320 has been flawless though. Not a single problem. :bowdown: :eusa_danc
 
My family been driving BMW for 15 years, never had a single interior problem at all. But I know og people having problem with Audi interiors like noise and squeaking.
Me and my family will not agree with this J.D Power survey, reliability is one of the reasons why we keep buying BMW's.

yeah just me i suppose different people have different experience

and you drive bmws or your family.so i cant comment as much as you on actual usage off a bmw bec mine is limited compared to you

but i did find the 3er interiro off my cousin very poor even i remeber his ashtray cover or holder was poor and he not one off those people who abuse the car he actually looked aftered it well

well u say in 15 years u havent had a single interiro problem all i can say is you damm lucky because thats a miricale

i no we using mercs since the day i was boen and although they strong and reliable i even had ineriro problems ..small things in the w124,w123 and w126 serires

but the worst mbs i think in terms off quality is the w203 and the prefaclifted one especially ...thats just my expeiencess

as for jd powes it is a survey which i respect but i can not say it is loke 100 percent but from my personell experience mb has definetilly improve quality and build in past 4 or so years
 
I'm glad the E-Class placed so high. That car was probably the model with the most consumer complaints and electronic niggles in the MB lineup and it made a stunning recovery.

Our 2002 E320 has been flawless though. Not a single problem. :bowdown: :eusa_danc

wimmer you lucky my friend my e270 cdi the 2002 model had a few elctronic glitches and diesle but i think the diesel was more due to the poor quality in sa at the time...now touch wood the same car with 120 thousand kilometers is moving nicely problem free but initailly it was bit bad
 
although initial quality is important, the long term quality is much more substantle in my oppinion.
 
wimmer you lucky my friend my e270 cdi the 2002 model had a few elctronic glitches and diesle but i think the diesel was more due to the poor quality in sa at the time...now touch wood the same car with 120 thousand kilometers is moving nicely problem free but initailly it was bit bad

A neighbour of mine also had a 2002 E270 CDI and it was in the shop all the time. He traded it in for a Lexus RX and a few years later the new RX400h. The car broke down this winter in a forest miles from where he lives. :D
 

Trending content


Back
Top