Yes and a car that's constantly being tracked, and hitting kerbs on the 'ring is basically hitting pot holes all day long.
Avoid writing junk more than those written in recent months. Each car forum is full of your junk.
The tolerance of toe, camber king pin and caster are in minutes of degree. You are completely dunce on the subject. Angles don't change with weather at least you should measured at given standard (try on Wikipedia you may understand what I mean). I tracked my lotus per years and need a re-alignement just one time due to a close encounter with a pothole but on a open road.
And Sport Auto do all the measurement at the beginning of the test, 650s supertest included (search on the forum) and Porsche have no problems with alignment.
Huge tolerance range. Basically Sport Auto are known for their dubiously quick 911 times relative to other cars and other magazines. E.g. GT2 RS as fast as Gumpert Apollo S on 'ring.
Huge pinch of salt what ?
If geometry stays accurate for so long, why aren't all cars smack bang in the centre of the tolerance range? In fact, why do they even have a tolerance range?
Now you're just spamming crap. Castelloli actually does have a higher speed bend going into a sharper turn to the right, see 1:43.
This however may not be the corner, it may be a braking g from high speed, where aero braking would play a part. The telemetry from Laguna Seca does not show increased mechanical grip for the Trofeo R.
Several problems with that test:Your biased reasoning fall completely when verifying 100mph-0 braking test where the huge downforce of the P1 (...lol) should raise grip and improve braking perfomance, instead the gap with the Porsche 918 increase to more than five meters.
You negate that the 918 spyder and the GT3 have the same N0 spec of the PSC2 because CH demonstrate how the trofeo R improve lap time comparing to the bespoke michelin, forgetting how the 918 spyder is advanced for weight distribuition, suspension and powertrain.
1) Off the shelf tyres, not bespoke 918 and P1 tyres.
2) Pirelli sponsored event, not really independent.
3) Laps done on separate days. Time of day, track temperature, ambient temperature?
4) We don't actually see either of the two MPSC2 hot laps in CH's COTY run, but we do see the hot laps for every other car. Now it's interesting that some people are skeptical when McLaren doesn't release a lap video, but when someone else omits the fundamental basis behind a test result, no one questions it. Even the TR laps in that video are badly edited, so it's not really good journalism.
5) The GT3's MPSC2 time is just poor frankly. You wouldn't expect it to be 4s down on a 458S, you'd expect nearer 2s. So when the TR hot lap ends up where most estimates would have put the MPSC2 lap in the first place, it's not very convincing
Same day test. Temperatures etc.? What speed from?
Not really.
MPSC2 on 458, colder temperature, beats Trofeo R on Huracan tested 12degC higher. PZCS languishing way behind.
