There are a hell of a lot of variables that determine who wins in any race. You could say the 918 wins the pole position for now. One outright fast lap is all it takes to win. Most of the lap times are hard to replicate anyway (records for GT-R, Z06, LF-A, 918, Huayra, etc.)I do not understand, if Porsche has beaten the P1 by 1 second and for 1 lap, why it is seen as a victory...
I could be plain stupid but I would rather like a car that can lap all day the same laptimes instead of 1.
F1 is not won by 1 fast lap but by the fastest overall for instance (and driver off course but you get my point).
And I do like both the P1 and the Porsche918, so no thrashing here.
Looks like the 918 is faster than the P1 on some tracks... for one lap.
This has surely turned into the shallowest victory every.![]()
These are supposed to be the road-going basis of GT endurance racers, so of course consistency matters, when has it not mattered in relation to racing and/or trackdays?quit chenging the subject of what faster means
first it was about who's FASTER
then when the nordschleife came in, it was about how its ON-PAPER STATS made it faster
when autocar found it to be faster on the dry track, it was about being faster in the WET
and now when the P1 is yet again beaten by the 918, suddenly CONSISTENCY is the most important thing
you keep changing the definition of what FASTER means in order for the P1 to win, the 918 set a faster laptime and that's all we need to know
I'm just quoting facts about how the 918 can only do one lap faster than the P1 on some tracks, and then 14 laps slower than the P1. Faster for a whole 90s and then slower for >21 minutes.Emu is quoting only what he likesWhat a surprise...
They did that this time, weren't you reading the quotes. The P1 was faster over 10 laps and 15 laps and even 4 laps. We all know the real aim of these test is to establish approximate race/track day capability and the P1 won on that.Because the purpose of the test was to see which car was capable of the fastest lap and that is what they tested for. Perhaps next time they can test to see who can do the fastest set of 10 laps.
The average owner won't be able to deplete the batteries of either car. If a race driver wanted to get the best out of the 918 over a number of laps he would probably be switching modes during each lap.
It was a factory 918 and my personal P1. The "customer car v customer car" test has yet to be done. Anyone got a 918?
They did that this time, weren't you reading the quotes. The P1 was faster over 10 laps and 15 laps and even 4 laps. We all know the real aim of these test is to establish approximate race/track day capability and the P1 won on that.
Wrong, the average owner actually uses the throttle more than a race driver and the brakes less because they don't carry as much speed through corners and don't brake as hard:
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-p1-f1/21713-p1-vs-918-a-37.html#post563178
"No none.. Fuel tank was the limit.
Chatting with some folks us mortals are normally about as aggressive as the pros with the throttle but not so good or even close on the brakes and carrying speed through corners. We could arguably be harder on the throttle although that's stretching a bit in my opinion as we carry less speed in corners.
I am also of the opinion that spa is a huge test for the regen, probably more so than the ring as more time spent at full throttle relative to part or off throttle.
So in my view if it had no problems at spa it won't anywhere but interesting to know what Ben found."
http://www.mclarenlife.com/forums/mclaren-p1-f1/21713-p1-vs-918-a-40.html#post563914
Oh how the pious and mighty have fallen!![]()
Oh wow, so the 918 did two laps marginally faster before it died and became slower for the next 13 laps. The only reason it's faster at all is because it has a mode that allows it to use the e-motors like a bottle of nitrous.What about this, EMU?
To sumarize some facts - this test was held to find which car can set a faster lap time. Porsche did it without any problem even with the non WS car and far less sets of tires.
It's more than obvious that treynor (Ben) isn't pleased with the fact, that his million dollar car was raped and tries to find something which is in his favor - telemetry, consistency, tire wear, etc... But the 918 didn't use its Race or Sport modes, which ARE the modes for consistent lapS, BECAUSE THIS WASN'T THE TARGET!
Next thing, which I expect from McLaren cultists is "which is faster from Paris to Dakar"
"First of all, it's called "Hot Lap" mode......not "Hot Laps", so it's designed to go like a qualifying lap. Hot Lap mode was never designed to set back to back fasest laps. You set consistent laps in Race Mode, that's why it's called "Race" (ie. uh....like in a "race"??).
Second, in the test, the P1 tried to "mimic" 918's Hot Lap mode by going slow in the first lap and then going for it full blast on the following lap. Ultimately, 918 has the Hot Lap mode because it can, due to brake re-gen. If the P1 had a Hot Lap mode (where it shuts off the engine re-gen function), sure the car would be faster, but the battery wouldn't even last a full lap because the P1 has no brake re-gen.
Third, even on the second lap (the lap right after the latest lap was set), the 918 still beats the P1 on its second lap (the lap right after the latest lap was set). The 918 dropped off by 1s on the second lap and the P1 dropped off 0.3-0.4s on its second lap.
918 had 1.29.X on its fastest lap, the second lap went up to 1.30.X. The P1 had 1.30.X on its fastest lap, the second lap went up to 1.31.X.
Fourth, no testing was done on the 918 in the Race mode for multiple laps. Unfortunately, this was not the objective set out by Porsche that day. It would be interesting to see what kind of laps the 918 can set under Race mode. We do know from Porsche testing data, the difference between Hot Lap and Race Mode at the Nurburgring is 3-4 seconds."
And they also came along with the car to the track! I thought they didn't do that right? Hands off approach and all?Really? Is this how desperate you are?
There were no customer 918's available. Even Porsche couldn't source a WP car so they sent along a non WP car. That tells you everything about how confident they were in the 918.
And of course Mclaren sent some techs along to make sure Ben's car was in tip top condition.
Mycroft, EmuHa! So why did Porsche choose MPSC2 for the 918 then?
McLaren is completely affiliated to Pirelli through F1, go ask the question on McLife.
I think it's pretty obvious don't you? If it's 1.5s off by lap 3, only 3 minutes in, and doesn't stabilise even at that, the game's up. Basically the P1 can lap to within a tenth of 1:31 all day long, whereas the 918 is up to 1:32 by lap 4. True GT race car genes show through. Nice try, thanks for playing.You really are sinking to new lows here. If you want to see how quick the 918 is over multiple laps you switch modes while you're driving. That wasn't done during this test so we have no idea how quick the 918 can be over 10 laps.
What I read comes from owners who were actually there. What you say Apolo1/citylad has been described as complete BS by said owners, hence why they have you on ignore.Mycroft, Emu
I am sorry but I can not debate with you anymore, you acutely have zero knowledge of the points you talk about other than what you read on other sites,
Some don't like my view,( I am not a cult member, ) I have no problem with that, we are all entitled to our views, I only comment the cars that I own along with my own track time experience.....don't need a mag article for a view,What I read comes from owners who were actually there. What you say Apolo1/citylad has been described as complete BS by said owners, hence why they have you on ignore.![]()
On the Spanish TG test, no decision yet on when its going to be shown, but it is in the current season......Deep insides Emu's soul there is so much anger and pain about P1 being slower...
At the beginning it was entertaining, but not any more. Now it's pathetic...
After all this 918>P3 massacre, Mac cultists are only interested in 24h endurance comparison tests, hahahaOn the Spanish TG test, no decision yet on when its going to be shown, but it is in the current season......
best we don't talk about that its a spider, with heated elec leather seats, and a working Nav and just about the best stereo put in any car....everAfter all this 918>P3 massacre, Mac cultists are only interested in 24h endurance comparison tests, hahaha
But wait, 918 has better e-millage and center wheel nuts, so even this isn't sure.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.