Smart ForMore Concept Revealed!
- Thread starter PHYBENZ
- Start date
This was supposed to be how SMART made it's way to the US. We are a Smart dealer. I don't get it. The car has some need things, but it drives like crap comared to some of the other small cars out there. The shifting is annoying. The Yaris, the Scion xA, are better cars with more room.
They only built 30k cars for the first year of US production. That will not sustain a brand with that little profit margin. They will need new products. The forfour was a good lookin car. Bring it back.
They only built 30k cars for the first year of US production. That will not sustain a brand with that little profit margin. They will need new products. The forfour was a good lookin car. Bring it back.
PHYBENZ
G-Class Explorer
- Messages
- 2,838
The forfour was terrible and a sales disaster. Its looks and design did not follow the Smart theme and it was based off a Mitsubishi platform and engine. A small SUV is a good idea, or a fully redesigned forFour that is more in line with the Smart philosophy.
jack
Kraftkurve King
- Messages
- 1,424
the forfour was indeed a terrible car, it looked like a playmobile. only the sound of the exhaust was nice (drove a 90ps version). but i think its really a pitty that they aren't trying to develop the brand any further.
the roadster was very cool, but designwise weak
the formore would have given the brand some strength, small urban suvs are really popular
the roadster was very cool, but designwise weak
the formore would have given the brand some strength, small urban suvs are really popular
- Messages
- 41,223
- Name
- Marcus
You're right on a few things here. The more I look at this car it shouldnt' be the hit that it is....at least on paper. Lets see:
Its RWD which means it will be a mess in anything more than dusting of snow becuase of its light weight and itty bitty tires.
It uses premium fuel! What is the point of buying it if you have to use the same fuel that Benzes use?
It at least looks like it should get 50-60 MPG and it doesn't come close. Other cheaper, bigger cars get better gas mileage! Youch.
Its just too small for me, I'd be scared to take it onto most main streets much less an Chicago area expressway.
The transmission is a mess as you say. I guess the cheapest version of the old Benz 5-speed automatic won't fit or is too expensive, but they've got to do better then the current trans. Hello....buy a cheap version of the VW DSG gearbox.
Smart most definitely needs at least 2 more cars to flush out the lineup because the fortwo's sales are going to sink like a rock when the novelty wears and/or if gas prices go back down. The little SUV should have been the 2nd model and than a sporty FWD roadster.
M
- Messages
- 13,235
Everything else being equal, itty bitty tires are actually better in snow (and rain) than big fat tires.
As for Smart, I think it is the yuppie young crowd in big cities that is lapping it up. Once that fad dies, I doubt it will have an enduring appeal. I find a zillion these days in the heart of San Francisco, but go outside the city and you hardly find any. My friend thought of getting one for her commute, but the used car market had much better options for the same price.
- Messages
- 41,223
- Name
- Marcus
Right if everything else were equal, but I think the Smart is just too small and light to deal with any deep snow.
I'm sure a lot of people would rather have a nice used car for the price, I know I would. A VW Jetta comes to mind for me.
M
Not exactly true. it is RWD, but it is also rear engine. So the weight is mostly over the rear tires. It's supposed to be a real gamer in the snow. 1,800 pounds really isn't light for such a small car.
Its a Mitzubishi engine. I'd say you can run regular unleaded without any quirks.
Transmission stinks out loud. I think the tranny hurts the mileage. I can't imagine all that lag helps things.
Regarding mileage. We've delivered about 90 cars, and most people are reporting about 45 mpg on the highway.
Also, no diesel in the S. The diesel should get close to what 60 mpg?
The things I like about the SMART are the interior. The fit is actually quite nice. The layout and controls are well placed and it seems quite durable.
also, safety. The thing got a 5 star side impact. I've see the video of the test and it seems very sturdy. I think it is safer than many larger cars.
We traded for a Scion xA and it seems like a lot more car for the money, IMO.
Wolfgang
Kraftwagen König
- Messages
- 10,229
Was the smart formore revived? 
smart as mini SUV
Four-wheel smart arrives in 2016
Mercedes smart daughter wants to join the SUV boom and revived its plans stopped in 2005 for a smart based SUV. Auto Motor und Sport learned from Mercedes-circles smart plans a taller version of the fortwo. The small SUV may appear in 2016.
The small SUV will not only have a raised body and independent body-cladding, but will optionally even be equipped with four-wheel drive. Source: Auto Motor und Sport via Automobilwoche
smart as mini SUV
Four-wheel smart arrives in 2016
Mercedes smart daughter wants to join the SUV boom and revived its plans stopped in 2005 for a smart based SUV. Auto Motor und Sport learned from Mercedes-circles smart plans a taller version of the fortwo. The small SUV may appear in 2016.
The small SUV will not only have a raised body and independent body-cladding, but will optionally even be equipped with four-wheel drive. Source: Auto Motor und Sport via Automobilwoche
Similar threads
- Article
smart
Smart (stylized in lowercase) is a German automotive marque. Smart Automobile Co., Ltd. is a joint
venture established by Mercedes-Benz AG and Zhejiang Geely Holding Group in 2019 and aimed at producing
Smart-badged cars in China to be marketed globally. The venture is headquartered in Ningbo, China.
It produces small battery electric vehicles in its manufacturing plant in China.
Official website: smart
Official website: smart
